Separation of Pregel API and Hama core

[Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>]

hey all,

what do you think of separating the new Pregel API introduced with HAMA-409
from the Hama Core stuff?

Best Regards,
Thomas


-- 
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin

mobile: 0170-3081070

business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com

Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core

["Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>]

+1 too.

Then, should we use a name like "hama-graph"? or to emphasize the
Pregel-clone, should it have own name?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> agreed, and this can be part of the planned separation between core and
> examples code.
> I can take care of that but I want to be sure the release we just made has
> reached Maven Central so that such changes happen from
> 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT onwards.
> Tommaso
>
> 2011/7/28 ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw>
>
>> +1
>>
>> This seems better to minimize dependency.
>>
>> -----Original message-----
>> From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>> To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Date:Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:18:09 +0900
>> Subject:Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core
>>
>> I'm attach the private messages with Miklos here.
>>
>> 2011/7/27 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>:
>> > Do you mean creating another maven module, like hama-graph?
>> > Then I think we should definitely separate it if it does not complicate
>> the
>> > build process.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Miklos
>> >
>> > On 27 Jul 2011 08:23, "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > That's great.
>> >
>> > BTW, Should we separate it from hama-core?
>> >
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > hey all,
>> >
>> > what do you think of separating the new Pregel API introduced with
>> HAMA-409
>> > from the Hama Core stuff?
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Thomas
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thomas Jungblut
>> > Berlin
>> >
>> > mobile: 0170-3081070
>> >
>> > business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
>> > private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>>
>> --
>> ChiaHung Lin
>> Department of Information Management
>> National University of Kaohsiung
>> Taiwan
>>
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core

[Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>]

agreed, and this can be part of the planned separation between core and
examples code.
I can take care of that but I want to be sure the release we just made has
reached Maven Central so that such changes happen from
0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT onwards.
Tommaso

2011/7/28 ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw>

> +1
>
> This seems better to minimize dependency.
>
> -----Original message-----
> From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date:Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:18:09 +0900
> Subject:Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core
>
> I'm attach the private messages with Miklos here.
>
> 2011/7/27 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>:
> > Do you mean creating another maven module, like hama-graph?
> > Then I think we should definitely separate it if it does not complicate
> the
> > build process.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Miklos
> >
> > On 27 Jul 2011 08:23, "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > That's great.
> >
> > BTW, Should we separate it from hama-core?
> >
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > hey all,
> >
> > what do you think of separating the new Pregel API introduced with
> HAMA-409
> > from the Hama Core stuff?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Jungblut
> > Berlin
> >
> > mobile: 0170-3081070
> >
> > business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
> > private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
>
> --
> ChiaHung Lin
> Department of Information Management
> National University of Kaohsiung
> Taiwan
>

Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core

[ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw>]

+1 

This seems better to minimize dependency. 

-----Original message-----
From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date:Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:18:09 +0900
Subject:Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core

I'm attach the private messages with Miklos here.

2011/7/27 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>:
> Do you mean creating another maven module, like hama-graph?
> Then I think we should definitely separate it if it does not complicate the
> build process.
>
> Cheers,
> Miklos
>
> On 27 Jul 2011 08:23, "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> That's great.
>
> BTW, Should we separate it from hama-core?
>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> hey all,
>
> what do you think of separating the new Pregel API introduced with HAMA-409
> from the Hama Core stuff?
>
> Best Regards,
> Thomas
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin
>
> mobile: 0170-3081070
>
> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon


--
ChiaHung Lin
Department of Information Management
National University of Kaohsiung
Taiwan

Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core

["Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>]

I'm attach the private messages with Miklos here.

2011/7/27 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>:
> Do you mean creating another maven module, like hama-graph?
> Then I think we should definitely separate it if it does not complicate the
> build process.
>
> Cheers,
> Miklos
>
> On 27 Jul 2011 08:23, "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> That's great.
>
> BTW, Should we separate it from hama-core?
>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> hey all,
>
> what do you think of separating the new Pregel API introduced with HAMA-409
> from the Hama Core stuff?
>
> Best Regards,
> Thomas
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin
>
> mobile: 0170-3081070
>
> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon