You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com> on 2016/07/20 16:32:18 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Hi IPMC Community
The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has passed
successfully.
We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
The PPMC vote thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a53ecee5575ec998d757a084ba5c4132691b1a97fd0e6705ab670fbe@%3Cdev.gearpump.apache.org%3E
The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/0.8.1-incubating/RC4/
The release hash is:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=commit;h=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS
The KEYS file is available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump
For information about the contents of this release see:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=8a24bf48066bff8b46316abd9d28cc62aac71095;hb=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
The vote will be open for 72 hours (Saturday, July 22, 2016 at 09:30 PST)
Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
Please vote:
[ ] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
Thanks,
Kam
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Kam Kasravi <ka...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi John
Thanks for the review.
>- I ran license dump on the release. Checked the output from
>output/target/license-reports and it reported several GPL dependencies.
>Can you take a look and perhaps put in overrides for the correct licenses?
For this report it is examining artifacts required to build the binaries. Since this is a source release is this required within the LICENSE?
- One thing I can't find is a way to run rat.
I run it using a convenience script under dev-tools (dev-tools/create_apache_source_release.sh), but it assumes I've checked out rat and made it available.Should all apache projects provide a way to run rat via mvn, sbt, ...?
ThanksKam
On Monday, July 25, 2016 5:49 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
Kam,
Apologies for the delay.
A couple of questions about the release.
- I ran license dump on the release. Checked the output from
output/target/license-reports and it reported several GPL dependencies.
Can you take a look and perhaps put in overrides for the correct licenses?
- In addition, the license dump indicates that there's a dependency on
gearpump 2.11. I'm assuming its an oddity with how I built the code.
- One thing I can't find is a way to run rat.
John
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 8:21 PM Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi IPMC Community
>
>
> We have not receive enough votes in the voting period to allow us to
> release Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1
> and therefore will extend the vote for most of this week - given this is a
> popular time for vacations, etc.
> If you have the time please evaluate 0.8.1-RC4 candidate.
>
> The voting period will be for 96 hours (Friday, July 29 5:30PM PST).
>
> Thanks
> kam
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi IPMC Community
> >
> > The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has
> passed
> > successfully.
> > We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
> >
> > The PPMC vote thread is here:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a53ecee5575ec998d757a084ba5c4132691b1a97fd0e6705ab670fbe@%3Cdev.gearpump.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/0.8.1-incubating/RC4/
> >
> >
> > The release hash is:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=commit;h=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS
> >
> > The KEYS file is available here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release see:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=8a24bf48066bff8b46316abd9d28cc62aac71095;hb=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (Saturday, July 22, 2016 at 09:30 PST)
> >
> > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kam
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Kam,
Apologies for the delay.
A couple of questions about the release.
- I ran license dump on the release. Checked the output from
output/target/license-reports and it reported several GPL dependencies.
Can you take a look and perhaps put in overrides for the correct licenses?
- In addition, the license dump indicates that there's a dependency on
gearpump 2.11. I'm assuming its an oddity with how I built the code.
- One thing I can't find is a way to run rat.
John
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 8:21 PM Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi IPMC Community
>
>
> We have not receive enough votes in the voting period to allow us to
> release Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1
> and therefore will extend the vote for most of this week - given this is a
> popular time for vacations, etc.
> If you have the time please evaluate 0.8.1-RC4 candidate.
>
> The voting period will be for 96 hours (Friday, July 29 5:30PM PST).
>
> Thanks
> kam
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi IPMC Community
> >
> > The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has
> passed
> > successfully.
> > We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
> >
> > The PPMC vote thread is here:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a53ecee5575ec998d757a084ba5c4132691b1a97fd0e6705ab670fbe@%3Cdev.gearpump.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/0.8.1-incubating/RC4/
> >
> >
> > The release hash is:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=commit;h=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS
> >
> > The KEYS file is available here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release see:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=8a24bf48066bff8b46316abd9d28cc62aac71095;hb=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (Saturday, July 22, 2016 at 09:30 PST)
> >
> > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kam
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi IPMC Community
We have not receive enough votes in the voting period to allow us to
release Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1
and therefore will extend the vote for most of this week - given this is a
popular time for vacations, etc.
If you have the time please evaluate 0.8.1-RC4 candidate.
The voting period will be for 96 hours (Friday, July 29 5:30PM PST).
Thanks
kam
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi IPMC Community
>
> The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has passed
> successfully.
> We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
>
> The PPMC vote thread is here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a53ecee5575ec998d757a084ba5c4132691b1a97fd0e6705ab670fbe@%3Cdev.gearpump.apache.org%3E
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/0.8.1-incubating/RC4/
>
>
> The release hash is:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=commit;h=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS
>
> The KEYS file is available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump
>
> For information about the contents of this release see:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=8a24bf48066bff8b46316abd9d28cc62aac71095;hb=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours (Saturday, July 22, 2016 at 09:30 PST)
>
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Thanks,
> Kam
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Manu,
As far as I can tell, you can extend a running vote for any period beyond
the minimum. Please take into consideration that people can be very busy
with $jobs, or - given this time of the year (the vacation period etc.)-
with other aspects regarding life.
That being said, If you - after having extended the vote - didn't attract
the desired outcome, you could always close, reword your initial request
and repost as a new vote.
Best advice ever: keep at it. Don't give up!
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Manu Zhang <ow...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Could any PMC members please take a look at this release candidate ?
> We have already passed the vote deadline but not got a vote yet.
> BTW, can we extend the vote because of the weekends ?
>
> Thanks,
> Manu Zhang
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi IPMC Community
> >
> > The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has
> passed
> > successfully.
> > We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
> >
> > The PPMC vote thread is here:
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a53ecee5575ec998d757a084ba5c4132691b1a97fd0e6705ab670fbe@%3Cdev.gearpump.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/0.8.1-incubating/RC4/
> >
> >
> > The release hash is:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=commit;h=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS
> >
> > The KEYS file is available here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release see:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=8a24bf48066bff8b46316abd9d28cc62aac71095;hb=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (Saturday, July 22, 2016 at 09:30 PST)
> >
> > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kam
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
I am out until the first week of August. Could one of the Gearpump mentors also on the IPMC have a look?
> On Jul 25, 2016, at 1:14 AM, Manu Zhang <ow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Could any PMC members please take a look at this release candidate ?
> We have already passed the vote deadline but not got a vote yet.
> BTW, can we extend the vote because of the weekends ?
>
> Thanks,
> Manu Zhang
>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi IPMC Community
>>
>> The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has passed
>> successfully.
>> We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
>>
>> The PPMC vote thread is here:
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a53ecee5575ec998d757a084ba5c4132691b1a97fd0e6705ab670fbe@%3Cdev.gearpump.apache.org%3E
>>
>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/0.8.1-incubating/RC4/
>>
>>
>> The release hash is:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=commit;h=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS
>>
>> The KEYS file is available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump
>>
>> For information about the contents of this release see:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=8a24bf48066bff8b46316abd9d28cc62aac71095;hb=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (Saturday, July 22, 2016 at 09:30 PST)
>>
>> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
>> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
>>
>> Please vote:
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kam
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Manu Zhang <ow...@gmail.com>.
Could any PMC members please take a look at this release candidate ?
We have already passed the vote deadline but not got a vote yet.
BTW, can we extend the vote because of the weekends ?
Thanks,
Manu Zhang
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM Kam Kasravi <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi IPMC Community
>
> The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has passed
> successfully.
> We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC.
>
> The PPMC vote thread is here:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a53ecee5575ec998d757a084ba5c4132691b1a97fd0e6705ab670fbe@%3Cdev.gearpump.apache.org%3E
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/0.8.1-incubating/RC4/
>
>
> The release hash is:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=commit;h=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS
>
> The KEYS file is available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump
>
> For information about the contents of this release see:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-gearpump.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=8a24bf48066bff8b46316abd9d28cc62aac71095;hb=533377fb135807d1f87a8a88c73ab6eb5a6c04c2
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours (Saturday, July 22, 2016 at 09:30 PST)
>
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.1
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Thanks,
> Kam
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
Jersey is dual licensed CDDL and a transitive dependency from (at least) Hadoop and Spark.
> On Jul 27, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Kam Kasravi <ka...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Hi Justin
>
> These were tagged as GPL
>
>
> I'll determine their dependencies linkage - we have no references to com.sun.jersey within our codebase but it looks to be dual licensed?
>
> Thanks
> Kam
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:28 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> > [Kam] This analyzes jars required to build the binary artifacts - so my assumption is that it is not relevant to release just the source?
>
> Apache project cannot have GPL dependancies [1][5][6] (there are however a few exceptions for optional parts[2] and some build tools [3]). I’d first check to see if the software is question is dual licensed. [4]
>
> > Based on just releasing source there are no CCL related artifacts included in the .tgz.
>
> Again see [1] and [6] for problematic licenses.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1.http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited
> 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional
> 3. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#build-tools
> 4. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#mutually-exclusive
> 5. http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
> 6. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Kam Kasravi <ka...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi Justin
These were tagged as GPL
I'll determine their dependencies linkage - we have no references to com.sun.jersey within our codebase but it looks to be dual licensed?
ThanksKam
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:28 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
Hi,
> [Kam] This analyzes jars required to build the binary artifacts - so my assumption is that it is not relevant to release just the source?
Apache project cannot have GPL dependancies [1][5][6] (there are however a few exceptions for optional parts[2] and some build tools [3]). I’d first check to see if the software is question is dual licensed. [4]
> Based on just releasing source there are no CCL related artifacts included in the .tgz.
Again see [1] and [6] for problematic licenses.
Thanks,
Justin
1.http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited
2. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional
3. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#build-tools
4. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#mutually-exclusive
5. http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
6. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> [Kam] This analyzes jars required to build the binary artifacts - so my assumption is that it is not relevant to release just the source?
Apache project cannot have GPL dependancies [1][5][6] (there are however a few exceptions for optional parts[2] and some build tools [3]). I’d first check to see if the software is question is dual licensed. [4]
> Based on just releasing source there are no CCL related artifacts included in the .tgz.
Again see [1] and [6] for problematic licenses.
Thanks,
Justin
1.http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited
2. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional
3. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#build-tools
4. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#mutually-exclusive
5. http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
6. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Kam Kasravi <ka...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi Justin
Again - thanks for your vigilance and time to review RC4.
>All like like there may be license dependancy issues, but I’m not familiar enough with sbt and the project to comment. This "sbt dependencyLicenseInfo | grep GNU” shows several GPL dependancies (may be duplicated?). It may be that these items are dual licensed with a license >that is comparable with the Apache license?
[Kam] This analyzes jars required to build the binary artifacts - so my assumption is that it is not relevant to release just the source?
>I also notice that you have release downloads on your web site. [3] Please make it clear that these are not Apache releases. I assume this is a work in progress but you might also want to look at the branding requirements at the same time and fix those as well. [4][Kam] Is this a requirement to release? We were planning on adding branding (as well as your suggestion above) once we release 0.8.1. (The branding issues was noted by John a few weeks ago). If this is a blocking issue we can update the site now. Note - the gearpump site is under https://github.com/apache/incubator-gearpump-site and is not bundled with the 0.8.1 source release.
>- there a few files with incorrect Apache headers [2] (also brought up last RC)[Kam] I will add the full header to worker.js and rerun rat.
>LICENSE is still missing, in general anything that is bundled needs to be added to LICENSE. [1]
>- pygments CSS[Kam] Are you referring to ./docs/css/pygments-default.css? This isn't embedding any pygments source code - just defaults for the gearpump site.
>- normalize (in bootstrap)[Kam] I missed this (as you also mention in your vimeo video) and will add a licenses/LICENSE-normalize.txt and related header in LICENSE
>- polypill (in moderniser)
[Kam] I will add a licenses/LICENSE-polyfill.txt and related header in LICENSE
>Also What happen to the binary files that were in the the last RC? Has the creative commons licensing issue been resolved?
Based on just releasing source there are no CCL related artifacts included in the .tgz.
ThanksKam
On Monday, July 25, 2016 9:59 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
Hi,
Looks much better than the last release candidate, however still +0 (binding) due to LICENSE issues, the items brought up for the last RC have not been addressed and possible GPL dependancies.
All like like there may be license dependancy issues, but I’m not familiar enough with sbt and the project to comment. This "sbt dependencyLicenseInfo | grep GNU” shows several GPL dependancies (may be duplicated?). It may be that these items are dual licensed with a license that is comparable with the Apache license?
I also notice that you have release downloads on your web site. [3] Please make it clear that these are not Apache releases. I assume this is a work in progress but you might also want to look at the branding requirements at the same time and fix those as well. [4]
I checked:
- incubating in release name
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE is better, but still missing bundled items brought up last RC
- there a few files with incorrect Apache headers [2] (also brought up last RC)
- can compile from source
LICENSE is still missing, in general anything that is bundled needs to be added to LICENSE. [1]
- pygments CSS
- normalize (in bootstrap)
- polypill (in moderniser)
One issue here is that you’re not following the terms of the bundled licenses (also brought up last RC) Just mentioning the license in LICENSE is not enough, the full text of the license needs to be included somewhere, usually this is in the header, but if it’s not there you need to include it. I see you have added some files to the licenses directory but having "Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>” in them doesn’t really tell the whole story does it :-)
Also What happen to the binary files that were in the the last RC? Has the creative commons licensing issue been resolved?
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
2. gearpump-0.8.1-RC4-incubating/services/dashboard/views/cluster/workers/worker/worker.js
3. http://gearpump.apache.org/downloads.html
4. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Looks much better than the last release candidate, however still +0 (binding) due to LICENSE issues, the items brought up for the last RC have not been addressed and possible GPL dependancies.
All like like there may be license dependancy issues, but I’m not familiar enough with sbt and the project to comment. This "sbt dependencyLicenseInfo | grep GNU” shows several GPL dependancies (may be duplicated?). It may be that these items are dual licensed with a license that is comparable with the Apache license?
I also notice that you have release downloads on your web site. [3] Please make it clear that these are not Apache releases. I assume this is a work in progress but you might also want to look at the branding requirements at the same time and fix those as well. [4]
I checked:
- incubating in release name
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE is better, but still missing bundled items brought up last RC
- there a few files with incorrect Apache headers [2] (also brought up last RC)
- can compile from source
LICENSE is still missing, in general anything that is bundled needs to be added to LICENSE. [1]
- pygments CSS
- normalize (in bootstrap)
- polypill (in moderniser)
One issue here is that you’re not following the terms of the bundled licenses (also brought up last RC) Just mentioning the license in LICENSE is not enough, the full text of the license needs to be included somewhere, usually this is in the header, but if it’s not there you need to include it. I see you have added some files to the licenses directory but having "Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>” in them doesn’t really tell the whole story does it :-)
Also What happen to the binary files that were in the the last RC? Has the creative commons licensing issue been resolved?
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
2. gearpump-0.8.1-RC4-incubating/services/dashboard/views/cluster/workers/worker/worker.js
3. http://gearpump.apache.org/downloads.html
4. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org