You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Wang Weidong (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/11/20 06:22:00 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (CALCITE-3466) JDBC adapter dropped group by
statement in subquery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Wang Weidong reassigned CALCITE-3466:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: Wang Weidong
> JDBC adapter dropped group by statement in subquery
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3466
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3466
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.21.0, 1.22.0
> Reporter: Wang Weidong
> Assignee: Wang Weidong
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.22.0
>
> Attachments: screenshot-1.png
>
>
> While convert RelNode to SqlNode, the "group by" statement in subquery was dropped unexpectedly. For example,
> original sql is:
> {code:sql}
> select a, avg(c1) from
> (
> select a,sum(d),b as c1 from t group by b,a
> ) as t
> group by a
> {code}
> RelNode converted by SqlNode is
> {code:sql}
> LogicalAggregate(group=[{0}], EXPR$1=[AVG($1)])
> LogicalProject(A=[$1], C1=[$0])
> LogicalAggregate(group=[{0, 1}], EXPR$1=[SUM($2)])
> LogicalProject(B=[$1], A=[$0], D=[$3])
> EnumerableTableScan(table=[[T_TESTPROJECTMERGE]])
> {code}
> And then convert this RelNode to SqlNode, the sql of SqlNode is like this:
> {code:sql}
> SELECT `A`, AVG(`B`)
> FROM `T`
> GROUP BY `A`
> {code}
> We can find that "group by" in subquery was dropped which may cause SqlNode converted by RelNode being not equivalent to RelNode.
> After debugging, I've found code
> at https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/aa98c1575762718b238af8ddd44a390607de7602/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rel2sql/RelToSqlConverter.java#L333
> calls org.apache.calcite.rel.rel2sql.SqlImplementor.Builder#setGroupBy without judge whether "group by" already exists.
> Finally, I think in this case, the main select and sub-select shouldn't be merged.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)