You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by "Jerry Cwiklik (JIRA)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2017/08/30 19:22:00 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (UIMA-5540) UIMA-AS: Aggregate type priorities are
not merged properly
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jerry Cwiklik closed UIMA-5540.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed aggregate code which merges meta's from all delegates with aggregate meta
> UIMA-AS: Aggregate type priorities are not merged properly
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-5540
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5540
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Async Scaleout
> Reporter: Jerry Cwiklik
> Assignee: Jerry Cwiklik
> Fix For: 2.10.0AS
>
>
> The UIMA-AS aggregate merges type priorities from all delegates. When all delegates report back, the aggregate does *not* merge its type priorities. The consequence is that the aggregate's type priorities are clobbered due to this:
> aggregateMetadata.setTypePriorities(getCasManagerWrapper().getMetadata().getTypePriorities());
> In the above, the CasManager contains type priorities from all delegates only.
> When UIMA-AS client receives Meta from an aggregate service, the type priorities are missing if an aggregate was the only one that defined it. If type priorities are moved from aggregate to a delegate all is well since the merge successfully added them to the aggregate meta.
> The fix is to merge an aggregate type priorities with the delegate type priorities before calling
> aggregateMetadata.setTypePriorities(...);
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)