You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by "Jerry Cwiklik (JIRA)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2017/08/30 19:22:00 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (UIMA-5540) UIMA-AS: Aggregate type priorities are not merged properly

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jerry Cwiklik closed UIMA-5540.
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

Fixed aggregate code which merges meta's from all delegates with aggregate meta

> UIMA-AS: Aggregate type priorities are not merged properly 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-5540
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5540
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Async Scaleout
>            Reporter: Jerry Cwiklik
>            Assignee: Jerry Cwiklik
>             Fix For: 2.10.0AS
>
>
> The UIMA-AS aggregate merges type priorities from all delegates. When all delegates report back, the aggregate does *not* merge its type priorities. The consequence is that the aggregate's type priorities are clobbered due to this:
> aggregateMetadata.setTypePriorities(getCasManagerWrapper().getMetadata().getTypePriorities());
> In the above, the CasManager contains type priorities from all delegates only.
> When UIMA-AS client receives Meta from an aggregate service, the type priorities are missing if an aggregate was the only one that defined it. If type priorities are moved from aggregate to a delegate all is well since the merge successfully added them to the aggregate meta. 
> The fix is to merge an aggregate type priorities with the delegate type priorities before calling
> aggregateMetadata.setTypePriorities(...);



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)