Re: Persistence From Redo Log Only?

[unknown12 <di...@momentschutz.de>]

Same here!

Each time i restart (shutdown/start) AMQ5|5.1 the KAHA store is recovered
and any message will be redelivered...Additionally the output of the admin
web console looks strange and is quite unusable (negative number of messages
pending or an empty message list is being displayed when clicking on the
queue but a some messages are displayed as pending...)

It's a bit weird... Is this a version issue? Has someone experienced this
with AMQ < 5?
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Persistence-From-Redo-Log-Only--tp15869535s2354p16559430.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Persistence From Redo Log Only?

[deen0 <di...@innotech.no>]

Hi dfrodrig,

Sorry, but i can't help you.

I hope someone from ActiveMQ team can answer...



dfrodrig wrote:
> 
> Hi Deen,
> 
> I am not using Jms transactions in most of the messages sent, and still
> the failover takes a huge amount of time.
> 
> The problem is still around, any ideas to solve it? Should I raise a bug,
> or is this an ActiveMQ feature? :-))
> 
> 
> 


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Persistence-From-Redo-Log-Only--tp15869535s2354p16936422.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Persistence From Redo Log Only?

[dfrodrig <da...@cern.ch>]

Hi Deen,

I am not using Jms transactions in most of the messages sent, and still the
failover takes a huge amount of time.

The problem is still around, any ideas to solve it? Should I raise a bug, or
is this an ActiveMQ feature? :-))






deen0 wrote:
> 
> When i stopped using jms transactions, and started using client
> acknowledgements, all these problems went away, and AMQ 5.1-snapshot is
> now very stable and working just as expected.
> 
> So my personal recommendation - do not use transactions. Use client
> acknoledgements instead (acknowledge instead of commit, revert instead of
> rollback).
> 
> Best regards.
> 
:-)
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Persistence-From-Redo-Log-Only--tp15869535s2354p16931584.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Persistence From Redo Log Only?

[deen0 <di...@innotech.no>]

When i stopped using jms transactions, and started using client
acknowledgements, all these problems went away, and AMQ 5.1-snapshot is now
very stable and working just as expected.

So my personal recommendation - do not use transactions. Use client
acknoledgements instead (acknowledge instead of commit, revert instead of
rollback).

Best regards.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Persistence-From-Redo-Log-Only--tp15869535s2354p16596885.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.