You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Paul Burba <pt...@gmail.com> on 2009/04/10 12:36:35 UTC
Tree Conflicts Question: Should svn st -q show TC?
Is it intentional that svn status --quiet suppresses tree conflicts?
trunk.dbg>svn st merge_tests-63.immediates
M merge_tests-63.immediates
M merge_tests-63.immediates\B
! C merge_tests-63.immediates\B\E
> local delete, incoming edit upon merge
M merge_tests-63.immediates\mu
M merge_tests-63.immediates\C
M merge_tests-63.immediates\D
! C merge_tests-63.immediates\D\H
> local delete, incoming edit upon merge
trunk.dbg>svn st merge_tests-63.immediates -q
M merge_tests-63.immediates
M merge_tests-63.immediates\B
M merge_tests-63.immediates\mu
M merge_tests-63.immediates\C
M merge_tests-63.immediates\D
No big deal, but I was surprised to see this.
Paul
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1630041
Re: Tree Conflicts Question: Should svn st -q show TC?
Posted by Paul Burba <pt...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 08:36:35AM -0400, Paul Burba wrote:
>> Is it intentional that svn status --quiet suppresses tree conflicts?
>
> No :-/
>
> I'd say we should only suppress the lines saying "> local delete... " etc.
Agreed. Created issue #3396. I'll try to get to when I can if nobody
beats me to it.
Paul
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1631418
Re: Tree Conflicts Question: Should svn st -q show TC?
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 08:36:35AM -0400, Paul Burba wrote:
> Is it intentional that svn status --quiet suppresses tree conflicts?
No :-/
I'd say we should only suppress the lines saying "> local delete... " etc.
Stefan