You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/03 05:15:11 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1922) MemoryLocksService fails if lock is acquired multiple times in same thread and released

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14083850#comment-14083850 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1922:
----------------------------------

Testing JIRA OOZIE-1922

Cleaning local git workspace

----------------------------

{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:green}+1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than 132
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac warnings
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:red}-1 TESTS{color}
.    Tests run: 1507
.    Tests failed: 1
.    Tests errors: 0

.    The patch failed the following testcases:

.      testResetSequence_withMultiThread(org.apache.oozie.service.TestZKUUIDService)

{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch 

----------------------------
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}


The full output of the test-patch run is available at

.   https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/1436/

> MemoryLocksService fails if lock is acquired multiple times in same thread and released
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-1922
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1922
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Purshotam Shah
>         Attachments: OOZIE-1922.1.patch
>
>
> ReentrantLock can be acquired multiple times in same thread. For multiple acquire call, ReentrantLock hold count is incremented by one.
> So if we acquire lock multiple time from same thread, all will be successful and  hold count is increased for every call.
> But if we release lock, MemoryLocksService ignore the count and deletes the lock. Even if it's held by some command.
> Simple step can reproduce it.
> {code}
>         service.getWriteLock("test", 5000); //writeHoldCount = 1
>         MemoryLockToken lock = (MemoryLockToken)service.getWriteLock("test", 5000); //writeHoldCount = 2
>         lock.release(); //writeHoldCount = 1
>         lock = (MemoryLockToken)service.getWriteLock("test", 5000); //writeHoldCount = 1, it should be 2.
> {code}
> {code}
>         @Override
>         public void release() {
>             int val = rwLock.getQueueLength();
>             if (val == 0) {
>                 synchronized (locks) {
>                     locks.remove(resource);
>                 }
>             }
>             lock.unlock();
>         }
>     }
> {code}
> MemoryLocks should check hold count before removing lock.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)