Re: WAS EJB Module import (was: websphere descriptors)

[Mohammad Nour El-Din <no...@gmail.com>]

I've resolved the issues I had with the JAXB generated classes. Thanks
to the tips and tricks provided by Dain and thanks to Karan who asked
the questions which made Dain answer by those tricks :D. I will submit
code with initial limited support for WAS EJB modules max. by the end
of this week.

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks :), I know this thread but didn't read it carefully b4 :)
>
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Karan Malhi <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mohammad,
>>
>> I found this discussion on nabble pretty useful.
>> http://www.nabble.com/jaxb-question-td18023648.html.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <
>> nour.mohammad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Karan...
>>>  Thanks for your support buddy ;). Well I don't have an exact answer
>>> for that question I need to do some investigation to make sure that it
>>> is not something wrong I do. And for documentation, I put this in my
>>> mind whether by blogging and/or the OpenEJB wiki. But if your would
>>> like you can go ahead and document about your experience with the
>>> faces descriptor :) . The problem with WAS specific DD(s) that they
>>> are a lot more, about 13+ schemas and they are designed in a bad way
>>> :S, which made me have to make some changes manually before generating
>>> the JAXB tree, so I have to make sure that nothing wrong from my side
>>> :). And I am starting from simple cases and will try to complicate
>>> thnigs more and more along the way we have more and more stable JAXB
>>> tree.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Karan Malhi <ka...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> still have some errors in the marshalling of
>>> >> the xmi file it is not marshalled as expected thats all, no error in
>>> >> the marshalling or unmarshalling.
>>> >
>>> > I would'nt worry about it if JAXB is changing the format of the file
>>> after
>>> > marshalling i.e. the contents are what we expect, but the format is
>>> > different than source.
>>> > --
>>> > Karan Singh Malhi
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>> - Mohammad Nour
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Karan Singh Malhi
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> - Mohammad Nour
>



-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour