You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net> on 2007/09/25 03:08:18 UTC
Re: svn commit: r578658 - in
/incubator/cxf/trunk/tools/wsdlto/test/src/test:
java/org/apache/cxf/tools/wsdlto/jaxws/ resources/wsdl2java_wsdl/cxf1053/
Am Montag, den 24.09.2007, 05:17 +0000 schrieb mmao@apache.org:
> Author: mmao
> Date: Sun Sep 23 22:17:10 2007
> New Revision: 578658
>
> + </wsdl:output>
> + <wsdl:fault name="extraFault">
> + <soap:fault name="extraFault" use="literal" />
> + </wsdl:fault>
I'm unsure here. Should the <soap:fault/> *also* have the "name"
attribute, or just the wsdl:fault alone?
Regards,
Glen
Re: svn commit: r578658 - in /incubator/cxf/trunk/tools/wsdlto/test/src/test:
java/org/apache/cxf/tools/wsdlto/jaxws/ resources/wsdl2java_wsdl/cxf1053/
Posted by James Mao <ja...@iona.com>.
Glen,
It's a valid wsdl
James
> Am Montag, den 24.09.2007, 05:17 +0000 schrieb mmao@apache.org:
>
>> Author: mmao
>> Date: Sun Sep 23 22:17:10 2007
>> New Revision: 578658
>>
>> + </wsdl:output>
>> + <wsdl:fault name="extraFault">
>> + <soap:fault name="extraFault" use="literal" />
>> + </wsdl:fault>
>>
>
> I'm unsure here. Should the <soap:fault/> *also* have the "name"
> attribute, or just the wsdl:fault alone?
>
> Regards,
> Glen
>
>
>