You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@hadoop.apache.org by Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org> on 2010/02/19 10:07:40 UTC
[VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
Please try it out. -C
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>.
Sending a gentle reminder to PMC members to vote on this release and
to devs and users to test it out. -C
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org> wrote:
> There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
> environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
>
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
>
> neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
>
> Please try it out. -C
>
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
+1. Downloaded, verified the md5 and gpg signed. Ran word count on a 1
node cluster.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1
Downloaded, verified checksums and ran tests. The usual suspects
failed, none of which are blockers.
Arun
On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
> environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
>
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
>
> neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
>
> Please try it out. -C
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>.
With 4 +1s, the vote passes. I'll push out the release. -C
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org> wrote:
> The rules are here:
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
> This says that one cannot veto a release, but 3 days should be
> sufficient for everyone to test it out and find problems. If nobody
> finds anything sufficient to block the release, I'll try to push it on
> Wednesday or Thursday. -C
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I believe the process is that there need to be 3 "+1" votes from PMC
>> members. I'm not sure if the one who rolled the release counts as one
>> of the binding +1 votes. If so, we should have the requisite number,
>> and we just need to wait a few days to be sure there are no -1s before
>> closing the vote. If not, we need one more PMC +1.
>>
>> So, to answer your question, I would guess < 1 week.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Todd
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Stephen Watt <sw...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> Bit of noob question here, but I haven't been around long enough to have
>>> observed the full lifecycle of a point release candidate yet. Given the
>>> generally positive feedback about 20.2 rc4, how close are we to actually
>>> releasing it? Is it 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks ?
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Steve Watt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From:
>>> Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
>>> To:
>>> general@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Date:
>>> 02/23/2010 03:34 PM
>>> Subject:
>>> Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I looked around, and found this repository of public keys:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no
>>> documentation on that point.
>>>
>>> We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include
>>> MAPREDUCE-587 -C
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>> Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9
>>>> Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in
>>>> http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be
>>>> added there if he is going to sign releases.
>>>>
>>>> I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus
>>>> failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from
>>>> that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a
>>>> pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine.
>>>>
>>>> Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should
>>>> release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20
>>>> before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA.
>>>>
>>>> So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris.
>>>>
>>>> -Todd
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> -dhruba
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled
>>>>>> logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look
>>>>>> grand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
>>>>>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
>>>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Please try it out. -C
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>.
The rules are here:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
This says that one cannot veto a release, but 3 days should be
sufficient for everyone to test it out and find problems. If nobody
finds anything sufficient to block the release, I'll try to push it on
Wednesday or Thursday. -C
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I believe the process is that there need to be 3 "+1" votes from PMC
> members. I'm not sure if the one who rolled the release counts as one
> of the binding +1 votes. If so, we should have the requisite number,
> and we just need to wait a few days to be sure there are no -1s before
> closing the vote. If not, we need one more PMC +1.
>
> So, to answer your question, I would guess < 1 week.
>
> Thanks
> -Todd
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Stephen Watt <sw...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Bit of noob question here, but I haven't been around long enough to have
>> observed the full lifecycle of a point release candidate yet. Given the
>> generally positive feedback about 20.2 rc4, how close are we to actually
>> releasing it? Is it 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks ?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Steve Watt
>>
>>
>>
>> From:
>> Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
>> To:
>> general@hadoop.apache.org
>> Date:
>> 02/23/2010 03:34 PM
>> Subject:
>> Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
>>
>>
>>
>> I looked around, and found this repository of public keys:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS
>>
>> I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no
>> documentation on that point.
>>
>> We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include
>> MAPREDUCE-587 -C
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9
>>> Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in
>>> http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be
>>> added there if he is going to sign releases.
>>>
>>> I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus
>>> failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from
>>> that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a
>>> pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine.
>>>
>>> Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should
>>> release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20
>>> before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA.
>>>
>>> So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris.
>>>
>>> -Todd
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests.
>>>>
>>>> -dhruba
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled
>>>>> logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look
>>>>> grand.
>>>>>
>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
>>>>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
>>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
>>>>> >
>>>>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please try it out. -C
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
Hi Steve,
I believe the process is that there need to be 3 "+1" votes from PMC
members. I'm not sure if the one who rolled the release counts as one
of the binding +1 votes. If so, we should have the requisite number,
and we just need to wait a few days to be sure there are no -1s before
closing the vote. If not, we need one more PMC +1.
So, to answer your question, I would guess < 1 week.
Thanks
-Todd
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Stephen Watt <sw...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Bit of noob question here, but I haven't been around long enough to have
> observed the full lifecycle of a point release candidate yet. Given the
> generally positive feedback about 20.2 rc4, how close are we to actually
> releasing it? Is it 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks ?
>
> Kind regards
> Steve Watt
>
>
>
> From:
> Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
> To:
> general@hadoop.apache.org
> Date:
> 02/23/2010 03:34 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
>
>
>
> I looked around, and found this repository of public keys:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS
>
> I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no
> documentation on that point.
>
> We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include
> MAPREDUCE-587 -C
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9
>> Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in
>> http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be
>> added there if he is going to sign releases.
>>
>> I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus
>> failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from
>> that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a
>> pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine.
>>
>> Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should
>> release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20
>> before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA.
>>
>> So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris.
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests.
>>>
>>> -dhruba
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled
>>>> logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look
>>>> grand.
>>>>
>>>> St.Ack
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
>>>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
>>>> >
>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
>>>> >
>>>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
>>>> >
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
>>>> >
>>>> > Please try it out. -C
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Stephen Watt <sw...@us.ibm.com>.
Bit of noob question here, but I haven't been around long enough to have
observed the full lifecycle of a point release candidate yet. Given the
generally positive feedback about 20.2 rc4, how close are we to actually
releasing it? Is it 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks ?
Kind regards
Steve Watt
From:
Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
To:
general@hadoop.apache.org
Date:
02/23/2010 03:34 PM
Subject:
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
I looked around, and found this repository of public keys:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS
I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no
documentation on that point.
We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include
MAPREDUCE-587 -C
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9
> Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in
> http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be
> added there if he is going to sign releases.
>
> I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus
> failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from
> that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a
> pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine.
>
> Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should
> release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20
> before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA.
>
> So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests.
>>
>> -dhruba
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled
>>> logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look
>>> grand.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
>>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
>>> >
>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
>>> >
>>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
>>> >
>>> > Please try it out. -C
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>.
I looked around, and found this repository of public keys:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS
I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no
documentation on that point.
We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include MAPREDUCE-587 -C
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9
> Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in
> http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be
> added there if he is going to sign releases.
>
> I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus
> failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from
> that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a
> pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine.
>
> Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should
> release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20
> before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA.
>
> So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests.
>>
>> -dhruba
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled
>>> logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look
>>> grand.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
>>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
>>> >
>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
>>> >
>>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
>>> >
>>> > Please try it out. -C
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9
Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in
http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be
added there if he is going to sign releases.
I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus
failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from
that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a
pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine.
Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should
release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20
before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA.
So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris.
-Todd
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests.
>
> -dhruba
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled
>> logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look
>> grand.
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
>> >
>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
>> >
>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
>> >
>> > Please try it out. -C
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
>
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Ravi Phulari <rp...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1 Release looks good.
Successfully ran unit tests , Executed Mapred word count program , verified user documentation.
-
Ravi
On 2/22/10 11:52 PM, "Dhruba Borthakur" <dh...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests.
-dhruba
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled
> logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look
> grand.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
> >
> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
> >
> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
> >
> > Please try it out. -C
> >
>
--
Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
Ravi
--
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com>.
+1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests.
-dhruba
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled
> logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look
> grand.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
> >
> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
> >
> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
> >
> > Please try it out. -C
> >
>
--
Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1
I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled
logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look
grand.
St.Ack
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org> wrote:
> There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my
> environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module:
>
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities
>
> neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4
>
> Please try it out. -C
>