You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by Michael Herndon <mh...@wickedsoftware.net> on 2012/04/13 02:17:06 UTC
user feedback on 3.0.3
Chris, Prescotts, others awesome committers working on trunk,
Do you wish the project to start attempting to gain attention for 3.0.3 and
possibly gain some community testing / wear and tear on it?
Also are there any pressing matters you wish to gain more feedback on from
the community? Our twitter account has been too silent.
-Michael
P.S. really great work on trunk. I've been playing with the bits as time
permits and might even use the upcoming release at work. If I do, I'll put
some time into contributing some docs / tutorials.
Re: user feedback on 3.0.3
Posted by "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <ca...@caspershouse.com>.
You Sir, win the Internets for a day. =)
On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:42 PM, "Michael Herndon" <mh...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> silly question. I script my tweets using powershell and my RMS-styled text
> only browser built using C# where all the strings are UTF-16. Real men use
> powershell.
>
> There should be an award for using that much satire and sass within 3
> statements or less.
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Michael - How did you manage to get a Unicode dot into your tweet in the
>> first place? ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Michael Herndon <
>> mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Done. For future reference to tweeting things with dots. We have to use
>>> ascii with Lucene.Net on tweets. Otherwise twitter will transform the
>>> "Lucene.Net" text into a link that points to its Java counterpart.
>>>
>>> Lucene.Net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Christopher Currens <
>>> currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay, I looked over the properties, and after a few slight changes, I
>>> think
>>>> they nearly all of them are within reason (either doing a
>>>> small mathematical computation or null check). I'm actually very eager
>>> to
>>>> start hearing feedback on the API changes. I think most people will be
>>>> able to figure it out easily.
>>>>
>>>> It would also be nice if people could find bugs we could fix before
>>>> releasing it. Actually, it would be nice if people knew there was a
>>> 3.0.3
>>>> version coming out. So, I say go for it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Christopher
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Christopher Currens <
>>>> currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Michael,
>>>>>
>>>>> Not quite yet. I think I was overly aggressive with some of the
>>>>> conversions I made with Get/Set functions to Properties, and I want
>> to
>>>>> revert any that I find do too much work back into a method.
>>>>>
>>>>> After that, I think most of the API changes left to make are fairly
>>>>> minimal, and it would be nice to get some feedback from the
>> community.
>>>>> Maybe I'll work on those properties tonight.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Christopher
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Herndon <
>>>>> mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Chris, Prescotts, others awesome committers working on trunk,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you wish the project to start attempting to gain attention for
>>> 3.0.3
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> possibly gain some community testing / wear and tear on it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also are there any pressing matters you wish to gain more feedback
>> on
>>>> from
>>>>>> the community? Our twitter account has been too silent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.S. really great work on trunk. I've been playing with the bits
>> as
>>>> time
>>>>>> permits and might even use the upcoming release at work. If I do,
>>> I'll
>>>>>> put
>>>>>> some time into contributing some docs / tutorials.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
RE: user feedback on 3.0.3
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
lol
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:41:32 -0400
> Subject: Re: user feedback on 3.0.3
> From: mherndon@wickedsoftware.net
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> silly question. I script my tweets using powershell and my RMS-styled text
> only browser built using C# where all the strings are UTF-16. Real men use
> powershell.
>
> There should be an award for using that much satire and sass within 3
> statements or less.
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Michael - How did you manage to get a Unicode dot into your tweet in the
> > first place? ;)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Michael Herndon <
> > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Done. For future reference to tweeting things with dots. We have to use
> > > ascii with Lucene.Net on tweets. Otherwise twitter will transform the
> > > "Lucene.Net" text into a link that points to its Java counterpart.
> > >
> > > Lucene.Net
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Christopher Currens <
> > > currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Okay, I looked over the properties, and after a few slight changes, I
> > > think
> > > > they nearly all of them are within reason (either doing a
> > > > small mathematical computation or null check). I'm actually very eager
> > > to
> > > > start hearing feedback on the API changes. I think most people will be
> > > > able to figure it out easily.
> > > >
> > > > It would also be nice if people could find bugs we could fix before
> > > > releasing it. Actually, it would be nice if people knew there was a
> > > 3.0.3
> > > > version coming out. So, I say go for it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Christopher
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Christopher Currens <
> > > > currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Michael,
> > > > >
> > > > > Not quite yet. I think I was overly aggressive with some of the
> > > > > conversions I made with Get/Set functions to Properties, and I want
> > to
> > > > > revert any that I find do too much work back into a method.
> > > > >
> > > > > After that, I think most of the API changes left to make are fairly
> > > > > minimal, and it would be nice to get some feedback from the
> > community.
> > > > > Maybe I'll work on those properties tonight.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Christopher
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > > > > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Chris, Prescotts, others awesome committers working on trunk,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Do you wish the project to start attempting to gain attention for
> > > 3.0.3
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> possibly gain some community testing / wear and tear on it?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Also are there any pressing matters you wish to gain more feedback
> > on
> > > > from
> > > > >> the community? Our twitter account has been too silent.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Michael
> > > > >>
> > > > >> P.S. really great work on trunk. I've been playing with the bits
> > as
> > > > time
> > > > >> permits and might even use the upcoming release at work. If I do,
> > > I'll
> > > > >> put
> > > > >> some time into contributing some docs / tutorials.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: user feedback on 3.0.3
Posted by Michael Herndon <mh...@wickedsoftware.net>.
silly question. I script my tweets using powershell and my RMS-styled text
only browser built using C# where all the strings are UTF-16. Real men use
powershell.
There should be an award for using that much satire and sass within 3
statements or less.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Michael - How did you manage to get a Unicode dot into your tweet in the
> first place? ;)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Michael Herndon <
> mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>
> > Done. For future reference to tweeting things with dots. We have to use
> > ascii with Lucene.Net on tweets. Otherwise twitter will transform the
> > "Lucene.Net" text into a link that points to its Java counterpart.
> >
> > Lucene.Net
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Christopher Currens <
> > currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Okay, I looked over the properties, and after a few slight changes, I
> > think
> > > they nearly all of them are within reason (either doing a
> > > small mathematical computation or null check). I'm actually very eager
> > to
> > > start hearing feedback on the API changes. I think most people will be
> > > able to figure it out easily.
> > >
> > > It would also be nice if people could find bugs we could fix before
> > > releasing it. Actually, it would be nice if people knew there was a
> > 3.0.3
> > > version coming out. So, I say go for it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Christopher
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Christopher Currens <
> > > currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Michael,
> > > >
> > > > Not quite yet. I think I was overly aggressive with some of the
> > > > conversions I made with Get/Set functions to Properties, and I want
> to
> > > > revert any that I find do too much work back into a method.
> > > >
> > > > After that, I think most of the API changes left to make are fairly
> > > > minimal, and it would be nice to get some feedback from the
> community.
> > > > Maybe I'll work on those properties tonight.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Christopher
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > > > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Chris, Prescotts, others awesome committers working on trunk,
> > > >>
> > > >> Do you wish the project to start attempting to gain attention for
> > 3.0.3
> > > >> and
> > > >> possibly gain some community testing / wear and tear on it?
> > > >>
> > > >> Also are there any pressing matters you wish to gain more feedback
> on
> > > from
> > > >> the community? Our twitter account has been too silent.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Michael
> > > >>
> > > >> P.S. really great work on trunk. I've been playing with the bits
> as
> > > time
> > > >> permits and might even use the upcoming release at work. If I do,
> > I'll
> > > >> put
> > > >> some time into contributing some docs / tutorials.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: user feedback on 3.0.3
Posted by Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com>.
Michael - How did you manage to get a Unicode dot into your tweet in the
first place? ;)
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Michael Herndon <
mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> Done. For future reference to tweeting things with dots. We have to use
> ascii with Lucene.Net on tweets. Otherwise twitter will transform the
> "Lucene.Net" text into a link that points to its Java counterpart.
>
> Lucene.Net
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Christopher Currens <
> currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Okay, I looked over the properties, and after a few slight changes, I
> think
> > they nearly all of them are within reason (either doing a
> > small mathematical computation or null check). I'm actually very eager
> to
> > start hearing feedback on the API changes. I think most people will be
> > able to figure it out easily.
> >
> > It would also be nice if people could find bugs we could fix before
> > releasing it. Actually, it would be nice if people knew there was a
> 3.0.3
> > version coming out. So, I say go for it.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Christopher
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Christopher Currens <
> > currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > Not quite yet. I think I was overly aggressive with some of the
> > > conversions I made with Get/Set functions to Properties, and I want to
> > > revert any that I find do too much work back into a method.
> > >
> > > After that, I think most of the API changes left to make are fairly
> > > minimal, and it would be nice to get some feedback from the community.
> > > Maybe I'll work on those properties tonight.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Christopher
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Chris, Prescotts, others awesome committers working on trunk,
> > >>
> > >> Do you wish the project to start attempting to gain attention for
> 3.0.3
> > >> and
> > >> possibly gain some community testing / wear and tear on it?
> > >>
> > >> Also are there any pressing matters you wish to gain more feedback on
> > from
> > >> the community? Our twitter account has been too silent.
> > >>
> > >> -Michael
> > >>
> > >> P.S. really great work on trunk. I've been playing with the bits as
> > time
> > >> permits and might even use the upcoming release at work. If I do,
> I'll
> > >> put
> > >> some time into contributing some docs / tutorials.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: user feedback on 3.0.3
Posted by Michael Herndon <mh...@wickedsoftware.net>.
Done. For future reference to tweeting things with dots. We have to use
ascii with Lucene.Net on tweets. Otherwise twitter will transform the
"Lucene.Net" text into a link that points to its Java counterpart.
Lucene.Net
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Christopher Currens <
currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, I looked over the properties, and after a few slight changes, I think
> they nearly all of them are within reason (either doing a
> small mathematical computation or null check). I'm actually very eager to
> start hearing feedback on the API changes. I think most people will be
> able to figure it out easily.
>
> It would also be nice if people could find bugs we could fix before
> releasing it. Actually, it would be nice if people knew there was a 3.0.3
> version coming out. So, I say go for it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Christopher Currens <
> currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Michael,
> >
> > Not quite yet. I think I was overly aggressive with some of the
> > conversions I made with Get/Set functions to Properties, and I want to
> > revert any that I find do too much work back into a method.
> >
> > After that, I think most of the API changes left to make are fairly
> > minimal, and it would be nice to get some feedback from the community.
> > Maybe I'll work on those properties tonight.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Christopher
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Chris, Prescotts, others awesome committers working on trunk,
> >>
> >> Do you wish the project to start attempting to gain attention for 3.0.3
> >> and
> >> possibly gain some community testing / wear and tear on it?
> >>
> >> Also are there any pressing matters you wish to gain more feedback on
> from
> >> the community? Our twitter account has been too silent.
> >>
> >> -Michael
> >>
> >> P.S. really great work on trunk. I've been playing with the bits as
> time
> >> permits and might even use the upcoming release at work. If I do, I'll
> >> put
> >> some time into contributing some docs / tutorials.
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: user feedback on 3.0.3
Posted by Christopher Currens <cu...@gmail.com>.
Okay, I looked over the properties, and after a few slight changes, I think
they nearly all of them are within reason (either doing a
small mathematical computation or null check). I'm actually very eager to
start hearing feedback on the API changes. I think most people will be
able to figure it out easily.
It would also be nice if people could find bugs we could fix before
releasing it. Actually, it would be nice if people knew there was a 3.0.3
version coming out. So, I say go for it.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Christopher Currens <
currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Not quite yet. I think I was overly aggressive with some of the
> conversions I made with Get/Set functions to Properties, and I want to
> revert any that I find do too much work back into a method.
>
> After that, I think most of the API changes left to make are fairly
> minimal, and it would be nice to get some feedback from the community.
> Maybe I'll work on those properties tonight.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Herndon <
> mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>
>> Chris, Prescotts, others awesome committers working on trunk,
>>
>> Do you wish the project to start attempting to gain attention for 3.0.3
>> and
>> possibly gain some community testing / wear and tear on it?
>>
>> Also are there any pressing matters you wish to gain more feedback on from
>> the community? Our twitter account has been too silent.
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>> P.S. really great work on trunk. I've been playing with the bits as time
>> permits and might even use the upcoming release at work. If I do, I'll
>> put
>> some time into contributing some docs / tutorials.
>>
>
>
Re: user feedback on 3.0.3
Posted by Christopher Currens <cu...@gmail.com>.
Michael,
Not quite yet. I think I was overly aggressive with some of the
conversions I made with Get/Set functions to Properties, and I want to
revert any that I find do too much work back into a method.
After that, I think most of the API changes left to make are fairly
minimal, and it would be nice to get some feedback from the community.
Maybe I'll work on those properties tonight.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Herndon <
mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> Chris, Prescotts, others awesome committers working on trunk,
>
> Do you wish the project to start attempting to gain attention for 3.0.3 and
> possibly gain some community testing / wear and tear on it?
>
> Also are there any pressing matters you wish to gain more feedback on from
> the community? Our twitter account has been too silent.
>
> -Michael
>
> P.S. really great work on trunk. I've been playing with the bits as time
> permits and might even use the upcoming release at work. If I do, I'll put
> some time into contributing some docs / tutorials.
>