You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/11 08:13:02 UTC
[VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)
Binaries are up for consideration.
Here's the staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/
I assume this is what was being asked for to run on the 3.0-beta branch.
The tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.10
Vote is up for 72 hours or as needed.
-David
Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Great.
Thank you guys.
Jean-Louis
Le 16 avril 2012 22:02, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Ok, closing vote with 5 +1s and no other votes.
>
> +1s:
> Forrest Xia
> David Blevins
> Kevan Miller
> Alan Cabrera
> Shawn Jiang
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 11:13 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> > Binaries are up for consideration.
> >
> > Here's the staging repo:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/
> >
> > I assume this is what was being asked for to run on the 3.0-beta branch.
> >
> > The tag:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.10
> >
> >
> > Vote is up for 72 hours or as needed.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Ok, closing vote with 5 +1s and no other votes.
+1s:
Forrest Xia
David Blevins
Kevan Miller
Alan Cabrera
Shawn Jiang
-David
On Apr 10, 2012, at 11:13 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Binaries are up for consideration.
>
> Here's the staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/
>
> I assume this is what was being asked for to run on the 3.0-beta branch.
>
> The tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.10
>
>
> Vote is up for 72 hours or as needed.
>
>
> -David
>
Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
I assume we're voting on the source releases in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/xbean/3.10/
One minor note: the copyright dates in the NOTICE file haven't been updated (Copyright 2005-2011 The Apache Software Foundation).
Everything else looked good: source, rat, build, etc.
+1
--kevan
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:13 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> Binaries are up for consideration.
>
> Here's the staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/
>
> I assume this is what was being asked for to run on the 3.0-beta branch.
>
> The tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.10
>
>
> Vote is up for 72 hours or as needed.
>
>
> -David
>
Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Binaries are up for consideration.
>
> Here's the staging repo:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/
>
> I assume this is what was being asked for to run on the 3.0-beta branch.
>
> The tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.10
>
>
> Vote is up for 72 hours or as needed.
>
>
> -David
>
>
--
Shawn
Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)
Posted by Forrest Xia <fo...@gmail.com>.
Though there are some ejb30.persistence tck failures, I think they are not
related to xbean 3.10 upgrade. So here my +1
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:13 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Binaries are up for consideration.
>
> Here's the staging repo:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/
>
> I assume this is what was being asked for to run on the 3.0-beta branch.
>
> The tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.10
>
>
> Vote is up for 72 hours or as needed.
>
>
> -David
>
>
--
Thanks!
Regards, Forrest
Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 10, 2012, at 11:13 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Binaries are up for consideration.
>
> Here's the staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/
>
> I assume this is what was being asked for to run on the 3.0-beta branch.
>
> The tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.10
>
>
> Vote is up for 72 hours or as needed.
>
>
> -David
>
Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Excellent. My +1
-David
On Apr 10, 2012, at 11:13 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Binaries are up for consideration.
>
> Here's the staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/
>
> I assume this is what was being asked for to run on the 3.0-beta branch.
>
> The tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.10
>
>
> Vote is up for 72 hours or as needed.
>
>
> -David
>