You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/12/27 22:27:43 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-144) Harmonizing different XML technologies and their usage in Solr

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ryan McKinley resolved SOLR-144.
--------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.3

Currenty there we have two cases where we parse xml:
# config files
# /update messages

All config files are parsed using the registered XML parser for {{XPathFactory.newInstance()}}

XML processing for XmlUpdateHandler are processed via StAX

This is not *unified*, but I think reasonable.  If we want to switch the xml parsing technique for config, lets open a new issue for that.

> Harmonizing different XML technologies and their usage in Solr
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-144
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-144
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Thorsten Scherler
>             Fix For: 1.3
>
>
> Resulting out of some comments in SOLR-133, we should harmonize our usage of different xml technologies.
> IMO we should move to StAX, since it is an upcoming standard and in comparison to SAX easier to use.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.