You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by "Michael Bouschen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2005/11/01 09:34:56 UTC

[jira] Closed: (JDO-36) Implement JDOQLQueryFactory proposal

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-36?page=all ]
     
Michael Bouschen closed JDO-36:
-------------------------------


> Implement JDOQLQueryFactory proposal
> ------------------------------------
>
>          Key: JDO-36
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-36
>      Project: JDO
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: ri11
>     Reporter: Michael Watzek
>     Assignee: Michael Bouschen

>
> There is a mail thread "Dependencies between ri11 runtime and r11 query" on jdo-dev that requests some preparation work before we start to solve the dependencies between runtime and query:
> We agreed on introducing a JDOQLQueryFactory interface declaring "newQuery" methods and a "newQueryTree" method. This interface will be placed in package "org.apache.jdo.jdoql". An implementation class of this interface (JDOQLQueryFactoryImpl) will be placed in package "org.apache.jdo.impl.jdoql".
> An instance of JDOQLQueryFactory will be kept in FOStorePMF. This instance will be created by "Class.newInstance".
> We introduce a new class FOStorePM extending PersistenceManagerImpl. This class implements all "newQuery" methods delegating to JDOQLQueryFactoryImpl. Class PersistenceManagerImpl will be made abstract removing all "newQuery" methods.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira