You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> on 2014/10/14 12:30:49 UTC
Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
I was reading
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/lastFailedBuild/console
and it's odd that
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/spark/styles/local/baselines/focusBlendMode_typeSelector.png.bad.png
and
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/spark/styles/local/baselines/focusBlendMode_typeSelector.png
are different sizes ? Or is that something Mustella does now and again ?
I also saq
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/spark/styles/local/baselines/cornerRadius_visualverification_classSelector.png.bad.png
and
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/spark/styles/local/baselines/cornerRadius_visualverification_classSelector.png
were the same to my eyes, so maybe it's just a bad run and it'll settle
down after yesterdays reboot.
--
extravision Signature
*Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
*T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
<http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
<http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
<ma...@extravision.com>
.
.
A fresh approach to email marketing
.
Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Oops, that’s me discrediting myself as a bonafide software engineer by
saying stuff like: “That can’t be it.”
;-)
EdB
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> That can’t be it. That player combo has been part of the test suite runs
> since the beginning of time. Maybe it’s time to delete some workspaces (the
> files in them, at least ;-)) and see if a fresh start from Git solves
> something?
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/16/14, 8:59 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 15/10/14 16:53, Alex Harui wrote:
>> >> versions.txt file has:
>> >> FLASH_VERSION=11.1
>> >> AIR_VERSION=3.7
>> >What in this means it's gone wrong and needs removing ?
>> Don’t know for sure, but I think we want the AIR SWF version to match the
>> Flash SWF version. The console output thinks it is trying to use FP 11.7
>> with AIR 3.7, and last time we had massive unexplained failures, I saw the
>> same thing, and when I deleted this file and restarted, mustella started
>> passing again.
>>
>>
>> So, I have my fingers crossed.
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 10/20/14, 2:42 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>If the .png's are different sizes, is it the fault of the version of the
>Player on the machine ?
Hard to say. I just ran the TileLayout tests on 11.7/3.7 on my Windows 7
machine and they all passed. I’m also pretty sure we’ve seen 11.7/3.7
pass on the flex-mustella server. I don’t know how many combinations we
are testing, but I think we have gone through several successful runs in
the past.
-Alex
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
If the .png's are different sizes, is it the fault of the version of the
Player on the machine ?
Tom
On 20/10/14 10:07, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I think it’s time, yes … Maybe we start by figuring out when the last good
> run was, and which commits have been made since?
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
I think it’s time, yes … Maybe we start by figuring out when the last good
run was, and which commits have been made since?
EdB
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> On 16/10/14 19:35, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> this particular incantation has worked both times. I did look and saw
>>
> Still failing, so I think we need a closer look at why the outputs are
> different sizes to the expected ?
>
> Tom
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
On 16/10/14 19:35, Alex Harui wrote:
> this particular incantation has worked both times. I did look and saw
Still failing, so I think we need a closer look at why the outputs are
different sizes to the expected ?
Tom
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 10/16/14, 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>What you are describing is actually the expected result: the versions.txt
>file has the last combo that succeeded (11.1/3.7) and the log shows the
>last combo that was run: 11.7/3.7.
OK, I didn’t realize that. Anyway, that’s where we got stuck twice and
this particular incantation has worked both times. I did look and saw
that an 11.7/3.7 run succeeded at one point in time, so it doesn’t look
like it is completely related to that combo. But at this point, I’m not
planning to spend any more time on it.
-Alex
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
What you are describing is actually the expected result: the versions.txt
file has the last combo that succeeded (11.1/3.7) and the log shows the
last combo that was run: 11.7/3.7.
EdB
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/16/14, 10:06 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
> >That can’t be it. That player combo has been part of the test suite runs
> >since the beginning of time. Maybe it’s time to delete some workspaces
> >(the
> >files in them, at least ;-)) and see if a fresh start from Git solves
> >something?
> Well, twice in a row now, we got stuck with lots of failures when the log
> said 11.7/3.7 combo but the file said 11.1/3.7. Deleting that file and
> restarting the machine and thus Jenkins caused the next runs to succeed.
> I have not tried just restarting the machine but I think Tom did and we
> still had failures. I personally don’t care to dig deeper or do more
> preventative cleaning; we have an incantation that seems to work. But
> feel free if you want to.
>
> -Alex
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 10/16/14, 10:06 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>That can’t be it. That player combo has been part of the test suite runs
>since the beginning of time. Maybe it’s time to delete some workspaces
>(the
>files in them, at least ;-)) and see if a fresh start from Git solves
>something?
Well, twice in a row now, we got stuck with lots of failures when the log
said 11.7/3.7 combo but the file said 11.1/3.7. Deleting that file and
restarting the machine and thus Jenkins caused the next runs to succeed.
I have not tried just restarting the machine but I think Tom did and we
still had failures. I personally don’t care to dig deeper or do more
preventative cleaning; we have an incantation that seems to work. But
feel free if you want to.
-Alex
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
That can’t be it. That player combo has been part of the test suite runs
since the beginning of time. Maybe it’s time to delete some workspaces (the
files in them, at least ;-)) and see if a fresh start from Git solves
something?
EdB
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> On 10/16/14, 8:59 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>
> >On 15/10/14 16:53, Alex Harui wrote:
> >> versions.txt file has:
> >> FLASH_VERSION=11.1
> >> AIR_VERSION=3.7
> >What in this means it's gone wrong and needs removing ?
> Don’t know for sure, but I think we want the AIR SWF version to match the
> Flash SWF version. The console output thinks it is trying to use FP 11.7
> with AIR 3.7, and last time we had massive unexplained failures, I saw the
> same thing, and when I deleted this file and restarted, mustella started
> passing again.
>
>
> So, I have my fingers crossed.
> -Alex
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 10/16/14, 8:59 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>On 15/10/14 16:53, Alex Harui wrote:
>> versions.txt file has:
>> FLASH_VERSION=11.1
>> AIR_VERSION=3.7
>What in this means it's gone wrong and needs removing ?
Don’t know for sure, but I think we want the AIR SWF version to match the
Flash SWF version. The console output thinks it is trying to use FP 11.7
with AIR 3.7, and last time we had massive unexplained failures, I saw the
same thing, and when I deleted this file and restarted, mustella started
passing again.
So, I have my fingers crossed.
-Alex
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
On 15/10/14 16:53, Alex Harui wrote:
> versions.txt file has:
> FLASH_VERSION=11.1
> AIR_VERSION=3.7
What in this means it's gone wrong and needs removing ?
Tom
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
The symptoms are the same as the last time things went bad. The
versions.txt file has:
FLASH_VERSION=11.1
AIR_VERSION=3.7
I’m going to cancel all jobs and delete that file and see if it gets it
act together, so ignore the next failure.
-Alex
On 10/15/14, 6:54 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>The last one really spectacularly!
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14/10/14 15:51, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>>> In general we don’t worry until two or three runs fail in a row.
>>>
>> Five in a row have now failed.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
The last one really spectacularly!
EdB
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> On 14/10/14 15:51, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> In general we don’t worry until two or three runs fail in a row.
>>
> Five in a row have now failed.
>
> Tom
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
On 14/10/14 15:51, Alex Harui wrote:
> In general we don’t worry until two or three runs fail in a row.
Five in a row have now failed.
Tom
Re: Recent Mustella failures - different sized baseline PNGs ?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
In general we don’t worry until two or three runs fail in a row. I’ve
seen the player/air combination appear to get confused and cause strange
results.
On 10/14/14, 3:30 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>I was reading
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/lastFailedBuild/co
>nsole
>and it's odd that
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>spark/styles/local/baselines/focusBlendMode_typeSelector.png.bad.png
>and
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>spark/styles/local/baselines/focusBlendMode_typeSelector.png
>are different sizes ? Or is that something Mustella does now and again ?
>
>I also saq
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>spark/styles/local/baselines/cornerRadius_visualverification_classSelector
>.png.bad.png
>and
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>spark/styles/local/baselines/cornerRadius_visualverification_classSelector
>.png
>were the same to my eyes, so maybe it's just a bad run and it'll settle
>down after yesterdays reboot.
>--
>extravision Signature
>*Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
>*T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
><http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
><http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
><ma...@extravision.com>
>.
>.
> A fresh approach to email marketing
>
>.
>Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
>Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
>
>Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
>addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
>have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
>e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
>distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
>attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
>of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
>E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
>amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
>this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
>