You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by TJ Frazier <tj...@cfl.rr.com> on 2011/10/29 21:39:08 UTC
Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai issues
Hi, Mark, et al.,
Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
in. I would have expected today's date.
There may be another small problem with this (email) method of getting
problems fixed: others who need to know may not be informed. I am trying
to fix that with the CC and Reply-to headers. --/tj/
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai issues
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:50:08 +0000
From: bugzilla@apache.org
Reply-To: ooo-issues@incubator.apache.org
To: ooo-issues@incubator.apache.org
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=92549
Bug 92549 depends on bug 92341, which changed state.
Bug 92341 Summary: WW8: CTL/Thai font convert incorrectly when import
from MS Office 2003
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=92341
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai
issues
Posted by TJ Frazier <tj...@cfl.rr.com>.
On 10/29/2011 19:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
>> Hi, Mark, et al.,
>>
>> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
>> in. I would have expected today's date.
>
> It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next
> upgrade.
Fine, sorry to bother you with it. Thanks for the link; I'll use it
before reporting further problems.
>
>> There may be another small problem with this (email) method of getting
>> problems fixed: others who need to know may not be informed.
>
> I'm not sure I follow you here. The only change has been the addition of
> the ooo-issues addressee. Everything else is exactly as it was prior to
> the move to the ASF.
Please see below.
>
>> I am trying to fix that with the CC and Reply-to headers. --/tj/
>
> Again, I don't follow you here. You don't have the ability to modify the
> reply to headers that are used with these e-mails. Neither do I get what
> you are trying to achieve.
I was thinking that many contributors on the ooo-dev list, since they
interact with BZ by filing, examining, and fixing issues, would want to
know about BZ problems. I erred in not copying the list on my earlier
complaint, which you solved so nicely. The headers I refer to are those
on my – and your, not BZ's – emails. Seems to work well.
>
> Mark
>
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643910
>
--
/tj/
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai issues
Posted by Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net>.
On Nov 3, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, David McKay <dm...@btconnect.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Mark, et al.,
>>>>
>>>> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
>>>> in. I would have expected today's date.
>>>
>>> It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next
>>> upgrade.
>>>
>>>> There may be another small problem with this (email) method of getting
>>>> problems fixed: others who need to know may not be informed.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I follow you here. The only change has been the addition of
>>> the ooo-issues addressee. Everything else is exactly as it was prior to
>>> the move to the ASF.
>>>
>>>> I am trying to fix that with the CC and Reply-to headers. --/tj/
>>>
>>> Again, I don't follow you here. You don't have the ability to modify the
>>> reply to headers that are used with these e-mails. Neither do I get what
>>> you are trying to achieve.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643910
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> As part of my current day job I am the administrator for our in-house
>> bugzilla instance. If you think I can be of assistance to with the AOO
>> Bugzilla, I'd be pleased to help.
>>
>
> Thanks for the offer, Dave. Do you currently have admin access to
> our BZ instance? If not, and if there are no objections (we can wait
> 24 hours to make sure) then you should enter a JIRA issue with Infra
> to get added.
+1.
>
> -Rob
>
>> Regards, Dave.
>>
Re: Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai issues
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, David McKay <dm...@btconnect.com> wrote:
>
> On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Mark, et al.,
>>>
>>> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
>>> in. I would have expected today's date.
>>
>> It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next
>> upgrade.
>>
>>> There may be another small problem with this (email) method of getting
>>> problems fixed: others who need to know may not be informed.
>>
>> I'm not sure I follow you here. The only change has been the addition of
>> the ooo-issues addressee. Everything else is exactly as it was prior to
>> the move to the ASF.
>>
>>> I am trying to fix that with the CC and Reply-to headers. --/tj/
>>
>> Again, I don't follow you here. You don't have the ability to modify the
>> reply to headers that are used with these e-mails. Neither do I get what
>> you are trying to achieve.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643910
>>
>>
>>
> Hi Mark,
>
> As part of my current day job I am the administrator for our in-house
> bugzilla instance. If you think I can be of assistance to with the AOO
> Bugzilla, I'd be pleased to help.
>
Thanks for the offer, Dave. Do you currently have admin access to
our BZ instance? If not, and if there are no objections (we can wait
24 hours to make sure) then you should enter a JIRA issue with Infra
to get added.
-Rob
> Regards, Dave.
>
Re: Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai
issues
Posted by David McKay <dm...@btconnect.com>.
On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
>> Hi, Mark, et al.,
>>
>> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
>> in. I would have expected today's date.
> It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next
> upgrade.
>
>> There may be another small problem with this (email) method of getting
>> problems fixed: others who need to know may not be informed.
> I'm not sure I follow you here. The only change has been the addition of
> the ooo-issues addressee. Everything else is exactly as it was prior to
> the move to the ASF.
>
>> I am trying to fix that with the CC and Reply-to headers. --/tj/
> Again, I don't follow you here. You don't have the ability to modify the
> reply to headers that are used with these e-mails. Neither do I get what
> you are trying to achieve.
>
> Mark
>
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643910
>
>
>
Hi Mark,
As part of my current day job I am the administrator for our in-house
bugzilla instance. If you think I can be of assistance to with the AOO
Bugzilla, I'd be pleased to help.
Regards, Dave.
Re: Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai
issues
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
> Hi, Mark, et al.,
>
> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
> in. I would have expected today's date.
It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next
upgrade.
> There may be another small problem with this (email) method of getting
> problems fixed: others who need to know may not be informed.
I'm not sure I follow you here. The only change has been the addition of
the ooo-issues addressee. Everything else is exactly as it was prior to
the move to the ASF.
> I am trying to fix that with the CC and Reply-to headers. --/tj/
Again, I don't follow you here. You don't have the ability to modify the
reply to headers that are used with these e-mails. Neither do I get what
you are trying to achieve.
Mark
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643910