You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by "potiuk (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2024/07/16 11:25:41 UTC

[PR] Fix flaky async sensor test [airflow]

potiuk opened a new pull request, #40813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40813

   I think this one should finally fix the flaky test. The issue with it was that in Pytest parsing the test might occur a long time before executing it - depending how many tests are run between and how slow the test run.
   
   The original test calculated the reference time at parsing time and it assumed on hour ahead (when minutes where 0-ed were enough) for the "deferral" to happen. But if parsing was executed (thus reference time calculation happened) before end of hour and execution after end hour, then the +1 hour from beginning of the reference hour already passed.
   
   The fix is to move the reference time calculation to inside the test, so that it is not calculated a long time before the test is run.
   
   The test runs on public runners are generally slower "per container", that's why it happened more frequently on public runners.
   
   <!--
    Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    distributed with this work for additional information
    regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
   
      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
   
    Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
    software distributed under the License is distributed on an
    "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
    KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
    specific language governing permissions and limitations
    under the License.
    -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing! Please make sure that your code changes
   are covered with tests. And in case of new features or big changes
   remember to adjust the documentation.
   
   Feel free to ping committers for the review!
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   closes: #ISSUE
   related: #ISSUE
   
   How to write a good git commit message:
   http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   -->
   
   
   
   <!-- Please keep an empty line above the dashes. -->
   ---
   **^ Add meaningful description above**
   Read the **[Pull Request Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)** for more information.
   In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal ([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals)) is needed.
   In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named `{pr_number}.significant.rst` or `{issue_number}.significant.rst`, in [newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/newsfragments).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Fix flaky async sensor test [airflow]

Posted by "potiuk (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on PR #40813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40813#issuecomment-2230656229

   I believe I found out why the async parse test was flaky finally @hussein-awala ?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Fix flaky async sensor test [airflow]

Posted by "potiuk (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk merged PR #40813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40813


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Fix flaky async sensor test [airflow]

Posted by "potiuk (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on PR #40813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40813#issuecomment-2230859197

   Yeah. The tests in "Other" run for ~ 11 minutes and this one was somewhere around 90% , so chances to hit this one were quite significant. Plus - when it happened it happend in **most** of the tests because they were starting around the same time + it seems that for scheduled build in the night it happened always, because the workflow starts at 0:40 and it takes about 10 minutes to start the tests from starting of the CI workflow. :exploding_head: 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Fix flaky async sensor test [airflow]

Posted by "potiuk (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on PR #40813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40813#issuecomment-2230869931

   And I think this is what confused me with my initial attempt about `add` - I noticed the `hour` difference from what I expected in the test (when I used "show timestamp" in the logs and I **assumed** it was the side effect of mutating the reference time ... 
   
   
   But in this case it was the TIME that shifted :scream: 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org