[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-982) valuesDecr, valuesIncr, keysDecr, and valuesDecr is lame.

["Marko A. Rodriguez (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-982.
----------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> valuesDecr, valuesIncr, keysDecr, and valuesDecr is lame.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-982
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-982
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: process
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.1-incubating, 3.1.0-incubating
>            Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez
>            Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
>             Fix For: 3.1.1-incubating
>
>
> I'm always doing this.
> {code}
> g.V().blah().groupCount().order(local).by(valuesDecr)
> {code}
> Why does this suck? Cause we already have {{decr}}. I think we should treat this like {{sample}}-step.
> {code}
> g.V().blah().groupCount().order(local).by(select(values),decr)
> {code}
> ......or something. Above is bad cause it would actually be {{by(select(values).unfold(),decr)}} which is even suckier................ [~dkuppitz] help a poor dying man.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)