You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> on 2007/10/05 15:24:56 UTC

Re: Time for new apr-* releases soon? Corrections inc for .vcproj conversion


On 10/05/2007 02:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 

> 
> Once APR is out, I'll plan on a httpd release too.
> 


There are several backport proposals in the STATUS file
missing only one vote. So I guess it is voting time :-).

Regards

Rüdiger

prefork: hung processes on graceful reload

Posted by Stefan Fritsch <sf...@sfritsch.de>.
On Monday 08 October 2007, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >> Maybe someone could also look at
> >>
> >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42829

> A quick review seems to indicate that the suggested patch could
> result in a worker accepting a request and then being killed
> off, something that we've tried to prevent...

The patch was broken in other ways, too.

I have attached a different patch that is definitely an improvement 
over 2.2.6 (though a small race condition remains). Can you look at 
it again and maybe include it in 2.2.7?

Thanks.

Cheers,
Stefan

Re: Time for new apr-* releases soon? Corrections inc for .vcproj conversion

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

>
> On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
>> On Friday 05 October 2007, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>> Once APR is out, I'll plan on a httpd release too.
>>>
>>> There are several backport proposals in the STATUS file
>>> missing only one vote. So I guess it is voting time :-).
>>
>> Maybe someone could also look at
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42829
>>
>> which is somewhat annoying and seems to have a working patch.
>>
>
> I'll review...
>
>

A quick review seems to indicate that the suggested patch could
result in a worker accepting a request and then being killed
off, something that we've tried to prevent...

Re: Time for new apr-* releases soon? Corrections inc for .vcproj conversion

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:

> On Friday 05 October 2007, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>> Once APR is out, I'll plan on a httpd release too.
>>
>> There are several backport proposals in the STATUS file
>> missing only one vote. So I guess it is voting time :-).
>
> Maybe someone could also look at
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42829
>
> which is somewhat annoying and seems to have a working patch.
>

I'll review...

Re: Time for new apr-* releases soon? Corrections inc for .vcproj conversion

Posted by Stefan Fritsch <sf...@sfritsch.de>.
On Friday 05 October 2007, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > Once APR is out, I'll plan on a httpd release too.
>
> There are several backport proposals in the STATUS file
> missing only one vote. So I guess it is voting time :-).

Maybe someone could also look at

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42829

which is somewhat annoying and seems to have a working patch.

TIA.

Cheers,
Stefan

Re: Time for new apr-* releases soon? Corrections inc for .vcproj conversion

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Oct 5, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:

>
>
> On 10/05/2007 02:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> Once APR is out, I'll plan on a httpd release too.
>>
>
>
> There are several backport proposals in the STATUS file
> missing only one vote. So I guess it is voting time :-).
>

I hope to have some cycles over the weekend to catch up
on my voting...