You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tapestry.apache.org by "Jochen Kemnade (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/16 17:02:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (TAP5-2263) IOC decorator matching bug

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14588158#comment-14588158 ] 

Jochen Kemnade commented on TAP5-2263:
--------------------------------------

[~thiagohp], are you still working on this?

> IOC decorator matching bug
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-2263
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2263
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tapestry-ioc
>    Affects Versions: 5.4
>            Reporter: Adriaan Joubert
>            Assignee: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>              Labels: easyfix
>
> In our implementation we have a factory service CacheFactory, with markers, that is injected into a Cache service with the same markers (say @MarkerA). In tests, I wish to replace the CacheFactory with
> @Decorate
> @MarkerA
> public CacheFactory decorate(...) {}
> However I get an error that the decorate method returns the wrong type. 
> The cause is that the matching of the decorators in the module implementation does not match on ServiceDef and markers. Specifically in 
> ModuleImpl.findMatchingDecoratorDefs there is a condition
> if (def.matches(serviceDef) || markerMatched(serviceDef, InternalUtils.toDecoratorDef2(def)))
>                 result.add(def);
> which needs to be
> if (def.matches(serviceDef) && markerMatched(serviceDef, InternalUtils.toDecoratorDef2(def)))
>                 result.add(def);
> to fix the problem. With the || it matches unrelated service definitions with the same markers.
> Thanks!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)