You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@gora.apache.org by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com> on 2015/10/27 03:54:09 UTC
Re: dev Digest 27 Oct 2015 01:21:05 -0000 Issue 726
Hi G. Ann,
This is actually my fault and I should not have left the tests in this
state.
In the meantime I think that we should retain the testFailureIgnore boolean
value as false as we want to know when something is broken.
I'll try and have a look into the failing tests this week. Thank you very
much for dropping in. Great to hear that you guys are doing large scale
source code analysis with such attention to detail.
Lewis
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:21 PM, <de...@gora.apache.org> wrote:
>
> Nemo SonarQube analysis of Gora
> <http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/792699> has been failing since
> 6
> Oct. on this:
>
> Results :
>
> Failed tests:
> testGetWithFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest):
> expected:<null> but was:<Random Joe>
>
> Tests in error:
>
> testMemStoreDeleteByQueryFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest)
>
>
> Build fails in the Core module.
>
> Note that our SOP is to build with -Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true.
> However, the main pom sets <testFailureIgnore>false</testFailureIgnore> on
> line 490, so these test failures must be resolved before we can analyze.
>
>
> Help?
> Ann
>
>
> ---
> *G. Ann CAMPBELL* | SonarSource
> Product Owner
> http://sonarsource.com
>
>
--
*Lewis*
Re: dev Digest 27 Oct 2015 01:21:05 -0000 Issue 726
Posted by "G. Ann Campbell" <an...@sonarsource.com>.
Ping @Lewis...
---
*G. Ann CAMPBELL* | SonarSource
Product Owner
http://sonarsource.com
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi G. Ann,
>
> This is actually my fault and I should not have left the tests in this
> state.
> In the meantime I think that we should retain the testFailureIgnore boolean
> value as false as we want to know when something is broken.
>
> I'll try and have a look into the failing tests this week. Thank you very
> much for dropping in. Great to hear that you guys are doing large scale
> source code analysis with such attention to detail.
> Lewis
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:21 PM, <de...@gora.apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Nemo SonarQube analysis of Gora
> > <http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/792699> has been failing
> since
> > 6
> > Oct. on this:
> >
> > Results :
> >
> > Failed tests:
> > testGetWithFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest):
> > expected:<null> but was:<Random Joe>
> >
> > Tests in error:
> >
> >
> testMemStoreDeleteByQueryFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest)
> >
> >
> > Build fails in the Core module.
> >
> > Note that our SOP is to build with -Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true.
> > However, the main pom sets <testFailureIgnore>false</testFailureIgnore>
> on
> > line 490, so these test failures must be resolved before we can analyze.
> >
> >
> > Help?
> > Ann
> >
> >
> > ---
> > *G. Ann CAMPBELL* | SonarSource
> > Product Owner
> > http://sonarsource.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>
Re: dev Digest 27 Oct 2015 01:21:05 -0000 Issue 726
Posted by "G. Ann Campbell" <an...@sonarsource.com>.
Thanks Lewis.
---
*G. Ann CAMPBELL* | SonarSource
Product Owner
http://sonarsource.com
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi G. Ann,
>
> This is actually my fault and I should not have left the tests in this
> state.
> In the meantime I think that we should retain the testFailureIgnore boolean
> value as false as we want to know when something is broken.
>
> I'll try and have a look into the failing tests this week. Thank you very
> much for dropping in. Great to hear that you guys are doing large scale
> source code analysis with such attention to detail.
> Lewis
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:21 PM, <de...@gora.apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Nemo SonarQube analysis of Gora
> > <http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/792699> has been failing
> since
> > 6
> > Oct. on this:
> >
> > Results :
> >
> > Failed tests:
> > testGetWithFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest):
> > expected:<null> but was:<Random Joe>
> >
> > Tests in error:
> >
> >
> testMemStoreDeleteByQueryFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest)
> >
> >
> > Build fails in the Core module.
> >
> > Note that our SOP is to build with -Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true.
> > However, the main pom sets <testFailureIgnore>false</testFailureIgnore>
> on
> > line 490, so these test failures must be resolved before we can analyze.
> >
> >
> > Help?
> > Ann
> >
> >
> > ---
> > *G. Ann CAMPBELL* | SonarSource
> > Product Owner
> > http://sonarsource.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>