Antwrap Version 0.7.0 - License Changes

[Caleb Powell <ca...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

I have just release version 0.7.0 of the Antwrap library. It is now using
the Apache Software License Version 2.0. In an attempt to avoid namespace
pollution, I have also made sure that all classes and modules in the project
reside inside an 'Antwrap' module. You may need to make a few minor changes
to your code.

As always, if you have any problems or concerns with the new version (be it
licensing or otherwise) please let me know.

Cheers!

-- 
Caleb

"I do not know which makes a man more conservative—to know nothing but the
present, or nothing but the past."
 - John Maynard Keynes

Re: Antwrap Version 0.7.0 - License Changes

[Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com>]

On 2/17/08, Victor Hugo Borja <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Caleb,
>
> On Feb 16, 2008 7:19 PM, Caleb Powell <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You may need to make a few minor changes
> > to your code.
> >
>
> Assaf,
>
> I've upgraded to Antwrap 0.7.0, the change required on buildr was minimal
> (only one line at ant.rb).
> I haven't submitted it into svn. I think we should go with this Antwrap
> version for Buildr 1.3 release,
> so, should I commit this change?.


Yes, please.


Also, yesterday the JRuby team released 1.1RC2, with many bug fixes and
> better overall performance,
> I've also downloaded it and ran our specs with it, the monkey-patching we
> had for 1.1RC1 bugs can
> new be deleted if we release Buildr 1.3 targetting JRuby 1.1RC2.


We should definitely target RC2, no point in keeping the monkey patches
around.

Assaf

--
> vic
>
> Quaerendo invenietis.
>

Re: Antwrap Version 0.7.0 - License Changes

[Victor Hugo Borja <vi...@gmail.com>]

Thanks Caleb,

On Feb 16, 2008 7:19 PM, Caleb Powell <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:

> You may need to make a few minor changes
> to your code.
>

Assaf,

I've upgraded to Antwrap 0.7.0, the change required on buildr was minimal
(only one line at ant.rb).
I haven't submitted it into svn. I think we should go with this Antwrap
version for Buildr 1.3 release,
so, should I commit this change?.

Also, yesterday the JRuby team released 1.1RC2, with many bug fixes and
better overall performance,
I've also downloaded it and ran our specs with it, the monkey-patching we
had for 1.1RC1 bugs can
new be deleted if we release Buildr 1.3 targetting JRuby 1.1RC2.

-- 
vic

Quaerendo invenietis.

Re: Antwrap Version 0.7.0 - License Changes

[Matthieu Riou <ma...@offthelip.org>]

On Feb 16, 2008 5:19 PM, Caleb Powell <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have just release version 0.7.0 of the Antwrap library. It is now using
> the Apache Software License Version 2.0. In an attempt to avoid namespace
> pollution, I have also made sure that all classes and modules in the
> project
> reside inside an 'Antwrap' module. You may need to make a few minor
> changes
> to your code.
>

That's great! Thanks a lot for the license change.

Matthieu


> As always, if you have any problems or concerns with the new version (be
> it
> licensing or otherwise) please let me know.
>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> Caleb
>
> "I do not know which makes a man more conservative—to know nothing but the
> present, or nothing but the past."
>  - John Maynard Keynes
>

Re: Antwrap Version 0.7.0 - License Changes

[Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com>]

Thanks.
Assaf

On 2/16/08, Caleb Powell <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just release version 0.7.0 of the Antwrap library. It is now using
> the Apache Software License Version 2.0. In an attempt to avoid namespace
> pollution, I have also made sure that all classes and modules in the
> project
> reside inside an 'Antwrap' module. You may need to make a few minor
> changes
> to your code.
>
> As always, if you have any problems or concerns with the new version (be
> it
> licensing or otherwise) please let me know.
>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> Caleb
>
> "I do not know which makes a man more conservative—to know nothing but the
> present, or nothing but the past."
> - John Maynard Keynes
>