You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flume.apache.org by Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org> on 2013/06/25 04:30:18 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
It fixes the following issues:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
*** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1)
for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
The tag to be voted on:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
Thanks,
Mike
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com>.
Sounds good, Mike, Arvind - thanks! I guess it really is BSD-licensed!
My vote:
+1
* Verified checksums, signatures
* Full build, runs OK.
* All top level files look good including the LICENSE file.
Thanks,
Hari
On Saturday, June 29, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Mike Percy wrote:
> Arvind, sounds reasonable to me.
>
> Hari, any concerns with this approach?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <arvind@apache.org (mailto:arvind@apache.org)>wrote:
>
> > Given that there is ambiguity in terms of which license applies, and given
> > that one of these licenses is Apache Software License 2.0, my suggestion is
> > to keep BSD on record for our release. That way, we cover the more
> > restrictive case and ideally should not pose any problems.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Arvind Prabhakar
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mike Percy <mpercy@apache.org (mailto:mpercy@apache.org)> wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting find, Hari. These guys are really a licensing disaster.
> > However
> > > I believe Maven is wrong since the LICENSE file in their repository
> > > contains this:
> > >
> >
> > https://code.google.com/p/findbugs/source/browse/branches/1.3.9/findbugs/LICENSE-jsr305.txt
> > >
> > > --
> > > The JSR-305 reference implementation (lib/jsr305.jar) is
> > > distributed under the terms of the New BSD license:
> > >
> > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
> > >
> > > See the JSR-305 home page for more information:
> > >
> > > http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/ -- So I think it really is BSD.
> > > Thoughts? Thanks, Mike
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Hari Shreedharan <
> > > hshreedharan@cloudera.com (mailto:hshreedharan@cloudera.com)
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom
> > > for
> > > > the specific version:
> > >
> > >
> >
> > http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar
> > > ).
> > > > The pom installed locally also has this:
> > > > <licenses>
> > > > <license>
> > > > <name>The Apache Software License, Version
> > > > 2.0</name>
> > > > <url>
> > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
> > > > <distribution>repo</distribution>
> > > > </license>
> > > > </licenses>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should
> > > > verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > the
> > > > Licenses file.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Hari
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > * Checked license file
> > > > > * Run tests
> > > > > * Checked other top level files
> > > > > * Checked checksums and signature
> > > > >
> > > > > Jarcec
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote:
> > > > > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> > > > > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It fixes the following issues:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5,
> > > > *.sha1)
> > > > > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maven staging repo:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The tag to be voted on:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is
> > > > here:
> > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org>.
Arvind, sounds reasonable to me.
Hari, any concerns with this approach?
Thanks,
Mike
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>wrote:
> Given that there is ambiguity in terms of which license applies, and given
> that one of these licenses is Apache Software License 2.0, my suggestion is
> to keep BSD on record for our release. That way, we cover the more
> restrictive case and ideally should not pose any problems.
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Interesting find, Hari. These guys are really a licensing disaster.
> However
> > I believe Maven is wrong since the LICENSE file in their repository
> > contains this:
> >
> >
> >
> https://code.google.com/p/findbugs/source/browse/branches/1.3.9/findbugs/LICENSE-jsr305.txt
> >
> > --
> > The JSR-305 reference implementation (lib/jsr305.jar) is
> > distributed under the terms of the New BSD license:
> >
> > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
> >
> > See the JSR-305 home page for more information:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/ -- So I think it really is BSD.
> > Thoughts? Thanks, Mike
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Hari Shreedharan <
> > hshreedharan@cloudera.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom
> > for
> > > the specific version:
> > >
> >
> http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar
> > ).
> > > The pom installed locally also has this:
> > > <licenses>
> > > <license>
> > > <name>The Apache Software License, Version
> > > 2.0</name>
> > > <url>
> > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
> > > <distribution>repo</distribution>
> > > </license>
> > > </licenses>
> > >
> > >
> > > The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should
> > > verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in
> the
> > > Licenses file.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Hari
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > * Checked license file
> > > > * Run tests
> > > > * Checked other top level files
> > > > * Checked checksums and signature
> > > >
> > > > Jarcec
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote:
> > > > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> > > > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
> > > > >
> > > > > It fixes the following issues:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> > > > >
> > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
> > > > >
> > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5,
> > > *.sha1)
> > > > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
> > > > >
> > > > > Maven staging repo:
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
> > > > >
> > > > > The tag to be voted on:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> > > > >
> > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is
> > > here:
> > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
Given that there is ambiguity in terms of which license applies, and given
that one of these licenses is Apache Software License 2.0, my suggestion is
to keep BSD on record for our release. That way, we cover the more
restrictive case and ideally should not pose any problems.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org> wrote:
> Interesting find, Hari. These guys are really a licensing disaster. However
> I believe Maven is wrong since the LICENSE file in their repository
> contains this:
>
>
> https://code.google.com/p/findbugs/source/browse/branches/1.3.9/findbugs/LICENSE-jsr305.txt
>
> --
> The JSR-305 reference implementation (lib/jsr305.jar) is
> distributed under the terms of the New BSD license:
>
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
>
> See the JSR-305 home page for more information:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/ -- So I think it really is BSD.
> Thoughts? Thanks, Mike
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Hari Shreedharan <
> hshreedharan@cloudera.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom
> for
> > the specific version:
> >
> http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar
> ).
> > The pom installed locally also has this:
> > <licenses>
> > <license>
> > <name>The Apache Software License, Version
> > 2.0</name>
> > <url>
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
> > <distribution>repo</distribution>
> > </license>
> > </licenses>
> >
> >
> > The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should
> > verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in the
> > Licenses file.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hari
> >
> >
> > On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > * Checked license file
> > > * Run tests
> > > * Checked other top level files
> > > * Checked checksums and signature
> > >
> > > Jarcec
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote:
> > > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> > > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
> > > >
> > > > It fixes the following issues:
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> > > >
> > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
> > > >
> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5,
> > *.sha1)
> > > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
> > > >
> > > > Maven staging repo:
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted on:
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> > > >
> > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is
> > here:
> > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org>.
Interesting find, Hari. These guys are really a licensing disaster. However
I believe Maven is wrong since the LICENSE file in their repository
contains this:
https://code.google.com/p/findbugs/source/browse/branches/1.3.9/findbugs/LICENSE-jsr305.txt
--
The JSR-305 reference implementation (lib/jsr305.jar) is
distributed under the terms of the New BSD license:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
See the JSR-305 home page for more information:
http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/ -- So I think it really is BSD.
Thoughts? Thanks, Mike
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Hari Shreedharan <hshreedharan@cloudera.com
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom for
> the specific version:
> http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar).
> The pom installed locally also has this:
> <licenses>
> <license>
> <name>The Apache Software License, Version
> 2.0</name>
> <url>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
> <distribution>repo</distribution>
> </license>
> </licenses>
>
>
> The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should
> verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in the
> Licenses file.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
>
> On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > * Checked license file
> > * Run tests
> > * Checked other top level files
> > * Checked checksums and signature
> >
> > Jarcec
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote:
> > > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> > > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
> > >
> > > It fixes the following issues:
> > >
> > >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> > >
> > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
> > >
> > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5,
> *.sha1)
> > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
> > >
> > > Maven staging repo:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted on:
> > >
> > >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> > >
> > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is
> here:
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mike
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com>.
Hi,
Looks like jsr305 is actually ASL2.0 (according to the mvn central pom for the specific version: http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.google.code.findbugs%7Cjsr305%7C1.3.9%7Cjar). The pom installed locally also has this:
<licenses>
<license>
<name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
<url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
<distribution>repo</distribution>
</license>
</licenses>
The webpage on the other hand says it is BSD licensed. Maybe we should verify this? I know the last few of our releases went out with BSD in the Licenses file.
Thanks,
Hari
On Friday, June 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> +1
>
> * Checked license file
> * Run tests
> * Checked other top level files
> * Checked checksums and signature
>
> Jarcec
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote:
> > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> >
> > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
> >
> > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1)
> > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
> >
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> >
> > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> >
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
+1
* Checked license file
* Run tests
* Checked other top level files
* Checked checksums and signature
Jarcec
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:30:18PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote:
> This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
>
> *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
>
> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1)
> for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
>
> The tag to be voted on:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
>
> Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org>.
+1
- Verified sigs & checksums
- Verified that all jars are accounted for in LICENSE file
- RELEASE-NOTES / CHANGELOG look ok
- Unit tests pass
- Binary artifact runs with default config template file
Mike
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> verified checksum
> build from source, working fine.
>
> RAT check doesn't like me and complains about .gitignore file. Maybe
> someone can check it in clean environment.
> I tried verifying the source tarball content with the git tag content, but
> didn't had success with it.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> > version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> >
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> >
> > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
> >
> > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1)
> > for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
> >
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
> >
> > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> >
>
>
>
> --
> thanks
> ashish
>
> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1
verified checksum
build from source, working fine.
RAT check doesn't like me and complains about .gitignore file. Maybe
someone can check it in clean environment.
I tried verifying the source tarball content with the git tag content, but
didn't had success with it.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
>
> *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
>
> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1)
> for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
>
> The tag to be voted on:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
>
> Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Alexander Alten-Lorenz <wg...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
- build, test works
- Windows related sources works
Good work,
Alex
On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
>
> *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
>
> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1)
> for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
>
> The tag to be voted on:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
>
> Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
--
Alexander Alten-Lorenz
http://mapredit.blogspot.com
German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.4.0 RC1
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
+1
* Built the sources
* Verified checksums and signatures
Thanks for the hard work Mike!
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is the fourth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> version 1.4.0. We are voting on release candidate RC1.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
>
> *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
>
> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1)
> for the source and binary artifacts can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.4.0-RC1/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-067/
>
> The tag to be voted on:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=756924e96ace470289472a3bdb4d87e273ca74ef
>
> Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>