You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by ro...@bull-enterprises.com on 2004/01/13 19:06:13 UTC
[jexl] - powered by.. was: checking for unresolved variables
> Bill,
>
> Your usage of Jexl is the first usage I know of which is separate from
> Jelly. If you happen to have pointers, it would be nice to start a page
> "powered-by".
>
> Paul
>
Just thought I would jump in here and say that I too am using Jexl in a
persistence engine (to be open sourced and housed somewhere...). I use it
to allow expressions in a dynamic SQL statement. As an FYI, there is a
"Anyone Using It Yet?" section on the main page of the site.
I started using it primarily because I use Jelly quite a bit and therefore
learned about Jexl.
As a side note, I sent a patch a couple of weeks ago fixing string
concatination but I don't know if Geir has done anything with it yet and I
can't get into Scarab to check.
In any event, nice to see others involved :-)
Robert McIntosh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jexl] - powered by.. was: checking for unresolved variables
Posted by ro...@bull-enterprises.com.
>>
>> As a side note, I sent a patch a couple of weeks ago fixing string
>> concatination but I don't know if Geir has done anything with it yet
>> and I
>> can't get into Scarab to check.
>
> Yes - it's been in there since the day you sent it....
>
> geir
>
Yes as in it is still in Scarab? :-) I remember you had questioned the
patch as non-JSTL compliant which didn't occur to at the time I created
it, but I don't remember anything else coming from that discussion. Not a
big deal though!
Robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jexl] - powered by.. was: checking for unresolved variables
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@4quarters.com>.
On Jan 13, 2004, at 1:06 PM, robert@bull-enterprises.com wrote:
>
>> Bill,
>>
>> Your usage of Jexl is the first usage I know of which is separate from
>> Jelly. If you happen to have pointers, it would be nice to start a
>> page
>> "powered-by".
>>
>> Paul
>>
>
> Just thought I would jump in here and say that I too am using Jexl in a
> persistence engine (to be open sourced and housed somewhere...). I use
> it
> to allow expressions in a dynamic SQL statement. As an FYI, there is a
> "Anyone Using It Yet?" section on the main page of the site.
>
> I started using it primarily because I use Jelly quite a bit and
> therefore
> learned about Jexl.
>
> As a side note, I sent a patch a couple of weeks ago fixing string
> concatination but I don't know if Geir has done anything with it yet
> and I
> can't get into Scarab to check.
Yes - it's been in there since the day you sent it....
geir
>
> In any event, nice to see others involved :-)
> Robert McIntosh
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m)
geir@4quarters.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org