You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "mcgilman (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/08/25 17:57:50 UTC
[PR] NIFI-16250 Treat an unconfigured SECRET_REFERENCE as unset [nifi]
mcgilman opened a new pull request, #11591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/11591
A SECRET property with no secret selected can be stored as a SECRET_REFERENCE carrying only a provider name. Both helpers relied on buildSecretKey, which never returns an empty string, so the select showed an unmatched key like "::Some Provider::" and hasPropertyValue reported the property as configured.
Both now check fullyQualifiedSecretName and secretName directly.
# Summary
[NIFI-16250](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-16250)
A SECRET property with no secret selected can be stored as a `SECRET_REFERENCE`
carrying only a provider name. `fromValueReference` and `hasPropertyValue` both
relied on `buildSecretKey`, which never returns an empty string, so the secret
select showed an unmatched key like `::Some Provider::` instead of its
placeholder, and `hasPropertyValue` reported the property as configured.
Both now check `fullyQualifiedSecretName` and `secretName` directly. A reference
carrying a `secretName` but no `fullyQualifiedSecretName` is still considered
configured.
Because `PropertyGroupCard` resolves `hasValue` through `hasPropertyValue`, the
configuration summary and connector details pages previously showed such a
property as having a value. They now show "No value set".
Verified with `nx test shared` (941 tests), `nx lint shared`, and `nx build shared`.
# Tracking
Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.
### Issue Tracking
- [Apache NiFi Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI) issue created
### Pull Request Tracking
- Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as `NIFI-00000`
- Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such `NIFI-00000`
- Pull request contains [commits signed](https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/signing-commits) with a registered key indicating `Verified` status
### Pull Request Formatting
- Pull Request based on current revision of the `main` branch
- Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes
# Verification
Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.
### Build
- [ ] Build completed using `./mvnw clean install -P contrib-check`
- [ ] JDK 21
- [ ] JDK 25
### Licensing
- [ ] New dependencies are compatible with the [Apache License 2.0](https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0) according to the [License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html)
- [ ] New dependencies are documented in applicable `LICENSE` and `NOTICE` files
### Documentation
- [ ] Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] NIFI-16250 Treat an unconfigured SECRET_REFERENCE as unset [nifi]
Posted by "rfellows (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
rfellows merged PR #11591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/11591
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org