You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by "abetomo (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/06/15 11:58:24 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow] abetomo opened a new pull request, #36089: GH-36025: [JS] Allow Node.js 18.14 or later in `verify-release-candidate.sh`

abetomo opened a new pull request, #36089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36089

   <!--
   Thanks for opening a pull request!
   If this is your first pull request you can find detailed information on how 
   to contribute here:
     * [New Contributor's Guide](https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/guide/step_by_step/pr_lifecycle.html#reviews-and-merge-of-the-pull-request)
     * [Contributing Overview](https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/overview.html)
   
   
   If this is not a [minor PR](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#Minor-Fixes). Could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose
   
   Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the [Openness](http://theapacheway.com/open/#:~:text=Openness%20allows%20new%20users%20the,must%20happen%20in%20the%20open.) of the Apache Arrow project.
   
   Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?
   
       GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}
   
   or
   
       MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}
   
   In the case of PARQUET issues on JIRA the title also supports:
   
       PARQUET-${JIRA_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}
   
   -->
   
   ### Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   In Node.js 18.14 or later, `gulp bundle:webpack` succeeds.
   So we support running `verify-release-candidate.sh` with Node.js 18.14 or later.
   
   ### What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   Node.js version check allows 16, 18.14 or later.
   Install Node.js LTS with `nvm`.
   
   ### Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   I have tested that `TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_JS=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh` succeeds in several environments.
   
   * Node.js is not installed
       * v18.16.0 installed with `nvm` and `verify-release-candidate.sh` succeeded.
   * Node.js 16.x installed
       *  Node.js 16.x is used and `verify-release-candidate.sh` succeeded.
   * Node.js 18.13.0 installed
       * v18.16.0 installed  with `nvm` and `verify-release-candidate.sh` succeeded.
   * Node.js 18.14.0 installed
       *  Node.js 18.14.0 is used and `verify-release-candidate.sh` succeeded.
   * Node.js 20.x installed
       *  Node.js 20.x is used and `verify-release-candidate.sh` succeeded.
   
   ### Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please uncomment the line below and explain which changes are breaking.
   -->
   <!-- **This PR includes breaking changes to public APIs.** -->
   
   <!--
   Please uncomment the line below (and provide explanation) if the changes fix either (a) a security vulnerability, (b) a bug that caused incorrect or invalid data to be produced, or (c) a bug that causes a crash (even when the API contract is upheld). We use this to highlight fixes to issues that may affect users without their knowledge. For this reason, fixing bugs that cause errors don't count, since those are usually obvious.
   -->
   <!-- **This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [arrow] kou merged pull request #36089: GH-36025: [JS] Allow Node.js 18.14 or later in `verify-release-candidate.sh`

Posted by "kou (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
kou merged PR #36089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36089


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [arrow] conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on pull request #36089: GH-36025: [JS] Allow Node.js 18.14 or later in `verify-release-candidate.sh`

Posted by "conbench-apache-arrow[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #36089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36089#issuecomment-1595762496

   Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmark runs on commit `28884b2e`.
   
   There were 3 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
   
   - Commit Run on `ursa-thinkcentre-m75q` at [2023-06-16 21:27:32Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/550efe36f9cb4d94bf57465bccc8165b...d006371638f847fd995e2ee3d8ebc67e/)
     - [params=32768/0/tiebreaker:0, source=cpp-micro, suite=arrow-compute-vector-sort-benchmark](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/0648cad3c237766d800033f18bc4cf56...0648cd49014973308000fbd51c5c0da5)
     - [params=<Int96Type>, source=cpp-micro, suite=parquet-bloom-filter-benchmark](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/0648cad0c9b17f8a80009af3c7ef5055...0648cd464af673a38000669c5582d2d1)
   - and 1 more (see the report linked below)
   
   The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/14343189376) has more details.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org