You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Peter Donald (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/09/24 03:08:51 UTC

[jira] Created: (FELIX-2622) Support static service properties that are not mirrored into fields

Support static service properties that are not mirrored into fields
-------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: FELIX-2622
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2622
             Project: Felix
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: iPOJO
    Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
            Reporter: Peter Donald
             Fix For: iPOJO-1.8.0


Sometimes you want to add static service properties to a component that you don't need to mirror in fields. This is of particular use when the component uses a generic specification (i.e. JComponent.class) but uses service properties to further classify the specification (i.e. name=foo;location=toolbar). An example of annotating a class for this would be

@Provides{ specifications = {JComponent.class}, properties = {@ServiceProperty{name="name", value="foo"},@ServiceProperty{name="location", value="toolbar"}}} )
 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2622) Support static service properties that are not mirrored into fields

Posted by "Clement Escoffier (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Clement Escoffier updated FELIX-2622:
-------------------------------------

    Assignee: Clement Escoffier

> Support static service properties that are not mirrored into fields
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2622
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: iPOJO
>    Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>            Reporter: Peter Donald
>            Assignee: Clement Escoffier
>             Fix For: iPOJO-1.8.0
>
>
> Sometimes you want to add static service properties to a component that you don't need to mirror in fields. This is of particular use when the component uses a generic specification (i.e. JComponent.class) but uses service properties to further classify the specification (i.e. name=foo;location=toolbar). An example of annotating a class for this would be
> @Provides{ specifications = {JComponent.class}, properties = {@ServiceProperty{name="name", value="foo"},@ServiceProperty{name="location", value="toolbar"}}} )
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2622) Support static service properties that are not mirrored into fields

Posted by "Clement Escoffier (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12914819#action_12914819 ] 

Clement Escoffier commented on FELIX-2622:
------------------------------------------

This is fixed in the trunk.
Now you can write:

@Component
@Provides(
    properties= {
	@StaticServiceProperty(name="prop1", value="prop1", type="java.lang.String"),
	@StaticServiceProperty(name="prop2", type="java.lang.String"),
	@StaticServiceProperty(name="props", value="{prop1, prop2}", type="string[]"),
	@StaticServiceProperty(name="mandatory1", mandatory=true, type="string")
})

I've used StaticServiceProperty and no ServiceProperty because the set of attribute is different. Indeed, the type attriubte is mandatory for static properties.

> Support static service properties that are not mirrored into fields
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2622
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: iPOJO
>    Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>            Reporter: Peter Donald
>            Assignee: Clement Escoffier
>             Fix For: iPOJO-1.8.0
>
>
> Sometimes you want to add static service properties to a component that you don't need to mirror in fields. This is of particular use when the component uses a generic specification (i.e. JComponent.class) but uses service properties to further classify the specification (i.e. name=foo;location=toolbar). An example of annotating a class for this would be
> @Provides{ specifications = {JComponent.class}, properties = {@ServiceProperty{name="name", value="foo"},@ServiceProperty{name="location", value="toolbar"}}} )
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-2622) Support static service properties that are not mirrored into fields

Posted by "Clement Escoffier (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Clement Escoffier resolved FELIX-2622.
--------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

> Support static service properties that are not mirrored into fields
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2622
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: iPOJO
>    Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>            Reporter: Peter Donald
>            Assignee: Clement Escoffier
>             Fix For: iPOJO-1.8.0
>
>
> Sometimes you want to add static service properties to a component that you don't need to mirror in fields. This is of particular use when the component uses a generic specification (i.e. JComponent.class) but uses service properties to further classify the specification (i.e. name=foo;location=toolbar). An example of annotating a class for this would be
> @Provides{ specifications = {JComponent.class}, properties = {@ServiceProperty{name="name", value="foo"},@ServiceProperty{name="location", value="toolbar"}}} )
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.