You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ws.apache.org by "Richard Porter (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/08/03 20:50:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (WSS-611) CAs with the NameConstraint extension cause exceptions when verifying trust

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16113457#comment-16113457 ] 

Richard Porter commented on WSS-611:
------------------------------------

[~coheigea], I am almost done with a patch for this issue against the current trunk. I need to review it a little more and verify that it is solid. I have a few questions:

# Should I attach a patch to this PR? It doesn't look like there have ever been any PRs against the Github mirror of the project, so I assume that patches are the preferred method.
# What is the timeframe for 2.2.0? I have a customer that is impacted by this and our efforts at extending {{Merlin}} as a short-term fix are hitting roadblocks. 
# Should I backport my patch for the 2_1_x-fixes branch as well? Is it more likely we will see a 2.1.11 version in a shorter timeframe?

> CAs with the NameConstraint extension cause exceptions when verifying trust
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WSS-611
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-611
>             Project: WSS4J
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: WSS4J Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.10
>            Reporter: Richard Porter
>            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>             Fix For: 2.2.0
>
>
> When a CA with NameConstraints is in the truststore, it causes a failure with any crypto Cert provider. The underlying cause is an {{IllegalArgumentException}} thrown because the Sequence data has been encoded as an Octet String and it is not being correctly decoded.
> While the relevant RFCs are a bit ambiguous with regard to extensions and whether they are all encoded as Octet Strings or not, the documentation on Java's implementation of [X509Extension|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/security/cert/X509Extension.html#getExtensionValue-java.lang.String-] are unambiguous: it will be a "DER-encoded OCTET string for the extension value.
> Beneath this issue lies another, the fact that the Sun default implementation of PKIX path validation does not support TrustAnchors with NameConstraints attached. So fixing the first issue also requires conditionally constructing TrustAnchors with NameConstraints or with null.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org