You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Kirill Gusakov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/12/13 23:24:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-18284) Prepare design for RebalanceScheduler role scope and it's election

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646864#comment-17646864 ] 

Kirill Gusakov commented on IGNITE-18284:
-----------------------------------------

The scope design available as document here https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/1446

> Prepare design for RebalanceScheduler role scope and it's election
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-18284
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18284
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Kirill Gusakov
>            Assignee: Kirill Gusakov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>
> According to the document attached in IGNITE-18060 we need to assign a separate role, let's call it RebalanceScheduler. Under this issue we need to clarify:
>  * Which scope should we use for this role: cluster/table/partition-wide? Depending on the answer to this question we can collocate this component with placement driver/primary replica/partition group RAFT leader/CMG leader/leader of metastorage group
>  * How will we guarantee, that only one scheduler per scope exists at the any moment? Also, we must guarantee that there are no any stale operations from previous scheduler overlap with the current one (by leasing techniques or alternatives)
>  * How we will re-elect the new one, when current died.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)