You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Bertrand Delacretaz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/05 14:50:33 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (JCRSITE-47) Site is completely broken

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14198377#comment-14198377 ] 

Bertrand Delacretaz commented on JCRSITE-47:
--------------------------------------------

It looks like the https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/site/live/.htaccess file is not active on the live website, as a result the content is under JCR, like http://jackrabbit.apache.org/JCR/documentation.html instead of http://jackrabbit.apache.org/documentation.html

> Site is completely broken
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCRSITE-47
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-47
>             Project: Jackrabbit Site
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: site
>            Reporter: Rick Herrick
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: Screen Shot 2014-11-05 at 7.27.14 AM.png
>
>
> The [Jackrabbit site|http://jackrabbit.apache.org] is completely broken and unusable. It has been for at least a couple of days. We're trying to decide if we should be using Jackrabbit as a back-end storage system. Does this indicate we shouldn't be using Jackrabbit as it's not being maintained? Should we be looking to Oak instead?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)