You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org> on 2003/03/19 15:20:21 UTC
Re: todo list
Leo Simons wrote, On 19/03/2003 14.53:
...
>> So if it was created in 2000 and edited in all years since it would be
>> 2000-2003, if it was edited in 2000 and again this year it would be
>> 2000,2003 or various other combinations (ie 2000-2001,2003).
>
> We talked about this on the PMC list recently (or was it here?). The
> resolution was that it is not terribly important from a legal POV to
> update this copyright information very exactly. If something is marked
> as copyrighted in 2000, it will remain copyrighted for the next 50 years
> or so (forgot the exact number); not renewing the copyright claim simply
> means that after that time the copyright becomes non-enforcable.
>
> In short, yes, we should update this, but the license is not invalid if
> the copyright date is a bit "stale".
Actually, a file's copyright should really be updated only when really
modifying it, not in bulk.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org