You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@syncope.apache.org by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org> on 2014/10/22 09:10:45 UTC
[DISCUSS] SVN repository cleanup
Hi all,
if you read comments in INFRA-8435, you will notice that it seems that
INFRA cannot easily make, for our SVN repository, the paths /trunk /tags
/branches read-only while keeping the rest read-write - which was my
initial request.
Given that, and considering that we are currently managing our website
via svnpubsub at /site, I've received the proposal to remove /trunk
/tags /branches from our SVN repository - now that we have our new GIT
repository fully operational.
The only issue I can see with this is for our wiki pages which often
reference SVN paths, with special reference to /tags in release notes
and upgrade procedures.
Before taking any action, I thought it was worth to briefly have a
discussion about this: I'm proposing to remove /branches and /trunk and
to leave /tags as is (for the reason expressed above).
WDYT?
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] SVN repository cleanup
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
On 24/10/2014 10:50, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Yup, I'll do it.
Thanks Colm!
FYI,
* trunk was removed in http://svn.apache.org/r1634032
* branches was removed in http://svn.apache.org/r1634033
Regards.
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> it seems that this discussion has not got particular feedback - but not
>> even raised any concern; I am then about to act as proposed, e.g. remove
>> from SVN /branches and /trunk and to leave /tags (and the rest) as is.
>> I'll let you know when done.
>>
>> There will be likely the need to review our wiki in order to find
>> references to /trunk or /branches and to change into links to
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=syncope.git
>> Any volunteer?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> On 22/10/2014 15:47, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>
>>> Seems reasonable to me.
>>>
>>> Colm.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
>>> ilgrosso@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> if you read comments in INFRA-8435, you will notice that it seems that
>>>> INFRA cannot easily make, for our SVN repository, the paths /trunk /tags
>>>> /branches read-only while keeping the rest read-write - which was my
>>>> initial request.
>>>>
>>>> Given that, and considering that we are currently managing our website
>>>> via
>>>> svnpubsub at /site, I've received the proposal to remove /trunk /tags
>>>> /branches from our SVN repository - now that we have our new GIT
>>>> repository
>>>> fully operational.
>>>>
>>>> The only issue I can see with this is for our wiki pages which often
>>>> reference SVN paths, with special reference to /tags in release notes and
>>>> upgrade procedures.
>>>>
>>>> Before taking any action, I thought it was worth to briefly have a
>>>> discussion about this: I'm proposing to remove /branches and /trunk and
>>>> to
>>>> leave /tags as is (for the reason expressed above).
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] SVN repository cleanup
Posted by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>.
Yup, I'll do it.
Colm.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgrosso@apache.org
> wrote:
> Hi all,
> it seems that this discussion has not got particular feedback - but not
> even raised any concern; I am then about to act as proposed, e.g. remove
> from SVN /branches and /trunk and to leave /tags (and the rest) as is.
> I'll let you know when done.
>
> There will be likely the need to review our wiki in order to find
> references to /trunk or /branches and to change into links to
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=syncope.git
> Any volunteer?
>
> Regards.
>
> On 22/10/2014 15:47, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
>> Seems reasonable to me.
>>
>> Colm.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
>> ilgrosso@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> if you read comments in INFRA-8435, you will notice that it seems that
>>> INFRA cannot easily make, for our SVN repository, the paths /trunk /tags
>>> /branches read-only while keeping the rest read-write - which was my
>>> initial request.
>>>
>>> Given that, and considering that we are currently managing our website
>>> via
>>> svnpubsub at /site, I've received the proposal to remove /trunk /tags
>>> /branches from our SVN repository - now that we have our new GIT
>>> repository
>>> fully operational.
>>>
>>> The only issue I can see with this is for our wiki pages which often
>>> reference SVN paths, with special reference to /tags in release notes and
>>> upgrade procedures.
>>>
>>> Before taking any action, I thought it was worth to briefly have a
>>> discussion about this: I'm proposing to remove /branches and /trunk and
>>> to
>>> leave /tags as is (for the reason expressed above).
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>
> --
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> http://www.tirasa.net/
>
> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>
>
--
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] SVN repository cleanup
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
it seems that this discussion has not got particular feedback - but not
even raised any concern; I am then about to act as proposed, e.g. remove
from SVN /branches and /trunk and to leave /tags (and the rest) as is.
I'll let you know when done.
There will be likely the need to review our wiki in order to find
references to /trunk or /branches and to change into links to
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=syncope.git
Any volunteer?
Regards.
On 22/10/2014 15:47, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Seems reasonable to me.
>
> Colm.
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> if you read comments in INFRA-8435, you will notice that it seems that
>> INFRA cannot easily make, for our SVN repository, the paths /trunk /tags
>> /branches read-only while keeping the rest read-write - which was my
>> initial request.
>>
>> Given that, and considering that we are currently managing our website via
>> svnpubsub at /site, I've received the proposal to remove /trunk /tags
>> /branches from our SVN repository - now that we have our new GIT repository
>> fully operational.
>>
>> The only issue I can see with this is for our wiki pages which often
>> reference SVN paths, with special reference to /tags in release notes and
>> upgrade procedures.
>>
>> Before taking any action, I thought it was worth to briefly have a
>> discussion about this: I'm proposing to remove /branches and /trunk and to
>> leave /tags as is (for the reason expressed above).
>>
>> WDYT?
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] SVN repository cleanup
Posted by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>.
Seems reasonable to me.
Colm.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgrosso@apache.org
> wrote:
> Hi all,
> if you read comments in INFRA-8435, you will notice that it seems that
> INFRA cannot easily make, for our SVN repository, the paths /trunk /tags
> /branches read-only while keeping the rest read-write - which was my
> initial request.
>
> Given that, and considering that we are currently managing our website via
> svnpubsub at /site, I've received the proposal to remove /trunk /tags
> /branches from our SVN repository - now that we have our new GIT repository
> fully operational.
>
> The only issue I can see with this is for our wiki pages which often
> reference SVN paths, with special reference to /tags in release notes and
> upgrade procedures.
>
> Before taking any action, I thought it was worth to briefly have a
> discussion about this: I'm proposing to remove /branches and /trunk and to
> leave /tags as is (for the reason expressed above).
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> http://www.tirasa.net/
>
> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>
>
>
--
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com