'make check' failed if configure --enable-runtime-module-search

[wuzhouhui <wu...@mails.ucas.ac.cn>]

Hi,

When compile Subversion with --enable-runtime-module-search, some tests
failed, such as subversion/tests/libsvn_client/client-test, the tests.log
says:

  svn_tests: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_fs_util' (expecting equality): found 1.13.0, expected 1.10.6
  svn_tests: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_delta' (expecting equality): found 1.13.0, expected 1.10.6 
  svn_tests: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_subr' (expecting equality): found 1.13.0, expected 1.10.6
  FAIL:  lt-client-test 3: test svn_wc_add3 scenarios

Environment information:
  OS: CentOS 7.5.1804
  Subversion: 1.13.0
  Build option: ./configure  --enable-apache-whitelist=2.4.6 --with-lz4=internal --enable-runtime-module-search
  Already installed Subversion: 1.10.6

It seems that the client-test found wrong dynamic library (*.so).

Re: 'make check' failed if configure --enable-runtime-module-search

[Nathan Hartman <ha...@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:47 AM wuzhouhui <wu...@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> When compile Subversion with --enable-runtime-module-search, some tests
> failed, such as subversion/tests/libsvn_client/client-test, the tests.log
> says:
>
>   svn_tests: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_fs_util' (expecting
> equality): found 1.13.0, expected 1.10.6
>   svn_tests: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_delta' (expecting
> equality): found 1.13.0, expected 1.10.6
>   svn_tests: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_subr' (expecting equality):
> found 1.13.0, expected 1.10.6
>   FAIL:  lt-client-test 3: test svn_wc_add3 scenarios
>
> Environment information:
>   OS: CentOS 7.5.1804
>   Subversion: 1.13.0
>   Build option: ./configure  --enable-apache-whitelist=2.4.6
> --with-lz4=internal --enable-runtime-module-search
>   Already installed Subversion: 1.10.6
>
> It seems that the client-test found wrong dynamic library (*.so).
>
Something seems reversed in the output:

found 1.13.0 and expected 1.10.6?

I think it should read:

found 1.10.6 and expected 1.13.0.

Perhaps our format string arguments are reversed. I am away from my
computer at the moment so I'll check later...

Nathan