You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/02/24 04:03:27 UTC

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1776) dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-1776:
---------------------------

    Description: the DismaxQParser (and ExtendedDismaxQParser) is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.  (was: the DismaxQParser is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.)
        Summary: dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf  (was: dismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf)

> dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1776
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> the DismaxQParser (and ExtendedDismaxQParser) is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.