You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> on 2006/03/11 18:51:05 UTC

[VOTE] Remove old contrib directory?

This directory contains the seed code from BEA and IBM. Things have
moved on quite a bit since then so I would like to suggest we remove
this code from the tree - old versions can still be found in the SVN
history if needed. This tree has been modified so no longer represents
the original contribution anyway.

I think this is worth voting on so I would suggest we need at least
three +1's and no -1's before doing it.

My +1

Thanks
--
Jeremy

Re: [VOTE] Remove old contrib directory?

Posted by Jim Marino <jm...@myroma.net>.
+1
On Mar 11, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

> This directory contains the seed code from BEA and IBM. Things have
> moved on quite a bit since then so I would like to suggest we remove
> this code from the tree - old versions can still be found in the SVN
> history if needed. This tree has been modified so no longer represents
> the original contribution anyway.
>
> I think this is worth voting on so I would suggest we need at least
> three +1's and no -1's before doing it.
>
> My +1
>
> Thanks
> --
> Jeremy
>


Re: [VOTE] Remove old contrib directory?

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me. There's codestyle templates in /contrib/java/trunk/docs/ which I
can't see any where else, are they the current ones and should they be kept
somewhere?

On 3/11/06, Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> > This directory contains the seed code from BEA and IBM. Things have
> > moved on quite a bit since then so I would like to suggest we remove
> > this code from the tree - old versions can still be found in the SVN
> > history if needed. This tree has been modified so no longer represents
> > the original contribution anyway.
> >
> > I think this is worth voting on so I would suggest we need at least
> > three +1's and no -1's before doing it.
> >
> > My +1
> >
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Jeremy
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Remove old contrib directory?

Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1

Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> This directory contains the seed code from BEA and IBM. Things have
> moved on quite a bit since then so I would like to suggest we remove
> this code from the tree - old versions can still be found in the SVN
> history if needed. This tree has been modified so no longer represents
> the original contribution anyway.
> 
> I think this is worth voting on so I would suggest we need at least
> three +1's and no -1's before doing it.
> 
> My +1
> 
> Thanks
> --
> Jeremy
> 

Re: [RESULT] Remove old contrib directory?

Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
Rick has moved the templates into the website.
I have now removed this tree as of revision 386856.

--
Jeremy

Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> 
>>This directory contains the seed code from BEA and IBM. Things have
>>moved on quite a bit since then so I would like to suggest we remove
>>this code from the tree - old versions can still be found in the SVN
>>history if needed. This tree has been modified so no longer represents
>>the original contribution anyway.
>>
>>I think this is worth voting on so I would suggest we need at least
>>three +1's and no -1's before doing it.
>>
> 
> 
> +1 from Jeremy Boynes, Jim Marino, Mike Edwards, Ant Elder,
>    Rick Rineholt
>    with comments about saving the code templates
> no -1 or other votes
> 
> I will remove this tree later this week once I have had a chance to move
> the code templates to the website.
> 
> --
> Jeremy


[RESULT] Remove old contrib directory?

Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> This directory contains the seed code from BEA and IBM. Things have
> moved on quite a bit since then so I would like to suggest we remove
> this code from the tree - old versions can still be found in the SVN
> history if needed. This tree has been modified so no longer represents
> the original contribution anyway.
> 
> I think this is worth voting on so I would suggest we need at least
> three +1's and no -1's before doing it.
> 

+1 from Jeremy Boynes, Jim Marino, Mike Edwards, Ant Elder,
   Rick Rineholt
   with comments about saving the code templates
no -1 or other votes

I will remove this tree later this week once I have had a chance to move
the code templates to the website.

--
Jeremy