You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Maarten_D <ma...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/11 17:42:38 UTC
amqPersistenceAdapter or kahaDB?
Hi,
I'm a little confused as to which persistence adapter I should use, perhaps
someone can give me some guidance.
My applications requires AMQ to handle a steady stream of several hundred
messages per hour, with occasional bursts of several tens of thousands per
hour (on a topic).
Which would be the best persistence adapter for this scenario?
Thanks in advance,
Maarten Dirkse
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/amqPersistenceAdapter-or-kahaDB--tp27113427p27113427.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: amqPersistenceAdapter or kahaDB?
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Hi Marteen,
I think
http://activemq.apache.org/persistence.html
is the right place for it. We just need more material there.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Maarten_D <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dejan,
> Thanks for the tip. I'll try some of those configs.
> Would it perhaps be usefull to do a kind of compare/contrast page between
> the different persistence strategies on the wiki? I'd be willing to make a
> start with the page an let the experts fill in the details.
> Regards,
> Maarten
>
>
> Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marteen,
> >
> > both adapters can do that work. KahaDB is improvement over AMQ
> persistence
> > adapter. It provides better scalability (as it uses less threads) and
> > better
> > recovery time (as it uses indexes). However it is a bit slower, but still
> > performant enough. I'd suggest you use one of the configuration files
> > distributed with 5.3.0 release as a starting point of your configuration.
> >
> > Cheers
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
> >
> > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Maarten_D <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm a little confused as to which persistence adapter I should use,
> >> perhaps
> >> someone can give me some guidance.
> >>
> >> My applications requires AMQ to handle a steady stream of several
> hundred
> >> messages per hour, with occasional bursts of several tens of thousands
> >> per
> >> hour (on a topic).
> >>
> >> Which would be the best persistence adapter for this scenario?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> Maarten Dirkse
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://old.nabble.com/amqPersistenceAdapter-or-kahaDB--tp27113427p27113427.html
> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Dejan Bosanac
> >
> > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/amqPersistenceAdapter-or-kahaDB--tp27113427p27115318.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: amqPersistenceAdapter or kahaDB?
Posted by Maarten_D <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dejan,
Thanks for the tip. I'll try some of those configs.
Would it perhaps be usefull to do a kind of compare/contrast page between
the different persistence strategies on the wiki? I'd be willing to make a
start with the page an let the experts fill in the details.
Regards,
Maarten
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>
> Hi Marteen,
>
> both adapters can do that work. KahaDB is improvement over AMQ persistence
> adapter. It provides better scalability (as it uses less threads) and
> better
> recovery time (as it uses indexes). However it is a bit slower, but still
> performant enough. I'd suggest you use one of the configuration files
> distributed with 5.3.0 release as a starting point of your configuration.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Maarten_D <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm a little confused as to which persistence adapter I should use,
>> perhaps
>> someone can give me some guidance.
>>
>> My applications requires AMQ to handle a steady stream of several hundred
>> messages per hour, with occasional bursts of several tens of thousands
>> per
>> hour (on a topic).
>>
>> Which would be the best persistence adapter for this scenario?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Maarten Dirkse
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/amqPersistenceAdapter-or-kahaDB--tp27113427p27113427.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> -----
> Dejan Bosanac
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/amqPersistenceAdapter-or-kahaDB--tp27113427p27115318.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: amqPersistenceAdapter or kahaDB?
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Hi Marteen,
both adapters can do that work. KahaDB is improvement over AMQ persistence
adapter. It provides better scalability (as it uses less threads) and better
recovery time (as it uses indexes). However it is a bit slower, but still
performant enough. I'd suggest you use one of the configuration files
distributed with 5.3.0 release as a starting point of your configuration.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Maarten_D <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm a little confused as to which persistence adapter I should use, perhaps
> someone can give me some guidance.
>
> My applications requires AMQ to handle a steady stream of several hundred
> messages per hour, with occasional bursts of several tens of thousands per
> hour (on a topic).
>
> Which would be the best persistence adapter for this scenario?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Maarten Dirkse
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/amqPersistenceAdapter-or-kahaDB--tp27113427p27113427.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>