You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@openoffice.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2016/10/05 20:51:02 UTC
[Issue 127153] New: lib64gdk_pixbuf_xlib2.0_0 isn't presented as
"Requires" library for installation RPM
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127153
Issue ID: 127153
Issue Type: DEFECT
Summary: lib64gdk_pixbuf_xlib2.0_0 isn't presented as
"Requires" library for installation RPM
Product: Installation
Version: 4.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux, all
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 (lowest)
Component: ui
Assignee: issues@openoffice.apache.org
Reporter: torokhov-s-a@yandex.ru
Recently I try to install Apache OpenOffice 64bit RPM-package on Rosa Linux
R8.Fresh.KDE and after successful installation I receive a crash on AOO
application startup:
$ ./soffice.bin
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::loader::CannotActivateFactoryException'
Application Error
Fatal exception: Signal 6
./soffice: line 121: 4841 Aborted (core dumped)
"$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@"
(more details in Rosa Linux bugtracker:
http://bugs.rosalinux.ru/show_bug.cgi?id=7411)
During exploration of "strace ./soffice.bin" output file I found that crash of
OpenOffice is due to absence of "libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0" library in my
system that is in "lib64gdk_pixbuf_xlib2.0_0" package. After installing this
package OpenOffice starts successfully. But I mention that there is no any
System Requirements of this library or no any mention as dependence in RPM
INFO-REQUREMENTS.
Usually this library is installed as dependence as xscreensaver that isn't
installed in my system.
Please add information about this dependence to the System Requirements
(http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo41.html) and to internal
RPM-INFO-Requirements of future OpenOffice 4.1.3 Release. I consider that this
issue may also occur on DEB-based systems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127153] lib64gdk_pixbuf_xlib2.0_0 isn't presented as
"Requires" library for installation RPM
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127153
Marcus <ma...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127153] lib64gdk_pixbuf_xlib2.0_0 isn't presented as
"Requires" library for installation RPM
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127153
oooforum (fr) <oo...@free.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |oooforum@free.fr
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from oooforum (fr) <oo...@free.fr> ---
Already reported
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 124948 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127153] lib64gdk_pixbuf_xlib2.0_0 isn't presented as
"Requires" library for installation RPM
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127153
sorath <to...@yandex.ru> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |torokhov-s-a@yandex.ru
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.