You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@axis.apache.org by glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no> on 2006/01/23 11:58:29 UTC

Complex problem

Hi All, 

This is a rather lengthy post, I hope someone will take the time to read it
through, as I've been struggling with the problem for a while. It describes
a complex, "real life", "business" scenario. This one is for you experts out

there! Novices, please skip this post .)

Here is a summary; When creating an application with messages involving
abstract schema types and substitution groups, Axis as a client serializes
messages wrong, ignoring the concrete implementations in the serialization
process using the generated base class for serialization".  

I've currently been assigned to create a so called "provisioning" interface
to a company's internal database. 

In practice, this means making the existing database modifiable through a
well defined web services interface. I've been trying out axis, but have
some major issues.

The company impose a "standard" for data provisioning, that manifests itself
as an abstract XML Schema, and an abstract WSDL file. 

The WSDL file define very generic "Update", "Save" , "Delete" and "Create"
messages. It does not specify "what" to "Update", "Save", "Delete" etc. That
is deferred to implementations like mine. I've created an identical setup,
since I cannot reveal the identity of my customer. 

First of all, there is a very generic XSD file that I cannot modify, It's
part of company policy. 

It defines a complex type, "AbstractCreateItemDefinition". This is the base
message type for all messages that "create" items in the system. 

The idea is to "extend" this Abstract type with create messages for real
items, i.e CreateComputerDefinition, CreateVacumCleanerDefinition.   

Please also notice the ref="CreateItemDefinition", this is the "magic" that
lets us put in any element that "extends" AbstractCreateDefinition here. 

<xs:schema
  targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
  xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">

  <xs:complexType name="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>
  <xs:element name="CreateItemDefinition"
type="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>

  <xs:element name="Create">
    <xs:complexType>
      <xs:sequence>
        <xs:element name="ItemType" type="xs:string"/>
        <xs:element name="ItemID" type="xs:int"/>
        <xs:element name="ItemAttributes" minOccurs="0">
          <xs:complexType>
            <xs:sequence>
              <xs:element ref="CreateItemDefinition"/>
            </xs:sequence>
          </xs:complexType>
        </xs:element>
      </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>
  </xs:element>
</xs:schema>

<xs:element name="CreateResponse" type="xs:int"/>

The WSDL file defines the "Provisioning" port, with only one operation
"Create". 

<definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
  xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
  xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/"
  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
  xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
  xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/"
  xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
  targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">

  <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
location="abstract.xsd"/>
  <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstraction/concrete/"
location="concrete.xsd"/>

  <message name="CreateRequest">
    <part name="parameters" element="gb:Create"/>
  </message>

  <message name="CreateResponse">
    <part name="parameters" element="gb:CreateResponse"/>
  </message>

  <portType name="Provisioning">
    <operation name="Create">
      <input message="gb:CreateRequest"/>
      <output message="gb:CreateResponse"/>
    </operation>
  </portType>

  <binding name="Provisioning" type="gb:Provisioning">
    <soap:binding style="document"
transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
    <operation name="Create">
      <soap:operation soapAction="gb#Create" style="document"/>
      <input>
        <soap:body use="literal"/>
      </input>
      <output>
        <soap:body use="literal"/>
      </output>
    </operation>
  </binding>

  <service name="Provisioning">
    <port name="Provisioning" binding="gb:Provisioning">
      <soap:address
location="http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning"/>
    </port>
  </service>


There is only one XSD that I have to write, that is the one defining the
actual Items that I want to provision (Create Update Delete and Get)

Please note that they are declared as a part of a substitution group
gb:CreateItemDefinition, matching the "ref" defined in the abstract XML
schema listed previously,. 

<xs:schema
  targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/"
  xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/"
  xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">

  <xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
    <xs:complexContent>
      <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
        <xs:sequence>
          <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
          <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
        </xs:sequence>
      </xs:extension>
    </xs:complexContent>
  </xs:complexType>

  <xs:complexType
    name="CreateDigitalCameraParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
    <xs:complexContent>
      <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
        <xs:sequence>
          <xs:element name="megapixels" type="xs:int"/>
        </xs:sequence>
      </xs:extension>
    </xs:complexContent>
  </xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>

I run WSDL2Java on the WSDL file 

	wsdl2java -S -s -W -D -a -o src\ web\abstract.wsdl

...  successfully. Everything looks very nice. CreateConmputerParameters are
generated to extend the abstract class. 

Generated files are listed here. 

Directory of C-.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\concrete

23.01.2006  11:21    <DIR>          .
23.01.2006  11:21    <DIR>          ..
23.01.2006  11:21             4 573 CreateComputerParameters.java
23.01.2006  11:21             3 730 CreateDigitalCameraParameters.java
               2 File(s)          8 303 bytes

 Directory of C:\.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract

23.01.2006  11:48    <DIR>          .
23.01.2006  11:48    <DIR>          ..
23.01.2006  11:21             2 524 AbstractCreateItemDefinition.java
23.01.2006  11:42             6 009 Create.java
23.01.2006  11:21             4 315 CreateItemAttributes.java
23.01.2006  11:21             3 973 deploy.wsdd
23.01.2006  11:21               492 Provisioning_BindingImpl.java
23.01.2006  11:21            10 686 Provisioning_BindingStub.java
23.01.2006  11:21               408 Provisioning_PortType.java
23.01.2006  11:21               646 Provisioning_Service.java
23.01.2006  11:21             5 703 Provisioning_ServiceLocator.java
23.01.2006  11:48               901 test.xml
23.01.2006  11:21               682 undeploy.wsdd

So I write a test class that invokes a call the service 

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
  {
    final String nsURI =
"http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/";
    final String serviceName = "Provisioning";
    final String endPointURI =
"http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning";
    final String wsdlURI = "http://localhost:8888/axis/abstract.wsdl";

    ServiceFactory serviceFactory = ServiceFactory.newInstance();
    Service provisioningService = serviceFactory.createService(new
URL(wsdlURI), new QName(nsURI, serviceName));
    Provisioning_BindingStub stub = new Provisioning_BindingStub(new
URL(endPointURI), provisioningService);

    final int mhz = 3600;
    final int mbRam = 1024;

     // This is the really interesting line 

    Create createComputer = new Create("itemtype@computer", 1, new Crea
teItemAttributes(new CreateComputerParameters(mhz, mbRam)));

    stub.create(createComputer);

  }

I deploy the service 

adminclient -l http://localhost:9999/axis/services/AdminService
src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract\deploy.wsdd

Now the trouble arrives... The Axis client side does not serialize my
request object correctly. It does not recognize that I've actually
constructed my "create" message with a CreateComputerParameters, but uses
the abstract class as a base for Serialization. 

xis/services/Provisioning HTTP/1.0
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Accept: application/soap+xml, application/dime, multipart/related, text/*
User-Agent: Axis/1.3
Host: localhost:8888
Cache-Control: no-cache
Pragma: no-cache
SOAPAction: "gb#Create"
Content-Length: 543

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <soapenv:Body>
    <Create xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">
      <ItemType xmlns="">itemtype@computer</ItemType>
      <ItemID xmlns="">1</ItemID>
      <ItemAttributes xmlns="">
        <ns1:CreateItemDefinition
xmlns:ns1="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"/>
      </ItemAttributes>
    </Create>
</soapenv:Body>

As you can see, the "Create" element has a nested "ItemAttributes" element,
that again nest a "CreateItemDefinition" instead of the
"CreateComputerParameters" that should have been serialized.

Is this setup too complex for Axis to handle? Is this setup just to compelx
in general? Should I call the standards department at my customer's company
and tell them to re-define the provisioning standard so it is possible to 
implement it ? 

All Advice are welcome ! 

Best regards,

Glenn Bech





Re: Complex problem

Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
did you try --wrapArrays parameter?

thanks,
dims

On 1/23/06, glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a rather lengthy post, I hope someone will take the time to read it
> through, as I've been struggling with the problem for a while. It describes
> a complex, "real life", "business" scenario. This one is for you experts out
>
> there! Novices, please skip this post .)
>
> Here is a summary; When creating an application with messages involving
> abstract schema types and substitution groups, Axis as a client serializes
> messages wrong, ignoring the concrete implementations in the serialization
> process using the generated base class for serialization".
>
> I've currently been assigned to create a so called "provisioning" interface
> to a company's internal database.
>
> In practice, this means making the existing database modifiable through a
> well defined web services interface. I've been trying out axis, but have
> some major issues.
>
> The company impose a "standard" for data provisioning, that manifests itself
> as an abstract XML Schema, and an abstract WSDL file.
>
> The WSDL file define very generic "Update", "Save" , "Delete" and "Create"
> messages. It does not specify "what" to "Update", "Save", "Delete" etc. That
> is deferred to implementations like mine. I've created an identical setup,
> since I cannot reveal the identity of my customer.
>
> First of all, there is a very generic XSD file that I cannot modify, It's
> part of company policy.
>
> It defines a complex type, "AbstractCreateItemDefinition". This is the base
> message type for all messages that "create" items in the system.
>
> The idea is to "extend" this Abstract type with create messages for real
> items, i.e CreateComputerDefinition, CreateVacumCleanerDefinition.
>
> Please also notice the ref="CreateItemDefinition", this is the "magic" that
> lets us put in any element that "extends" AbstractCreateDefinition here.
>
> <xs:schema
>   targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
>   xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
>   xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
>
>   <xs:complexType name="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>
>   <xs:element name="CreateItemDefinition"
> type="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>
>
>   <xs:element name="Create">
>     <xs:complexType>
>       <xs:sequence>
>         <xs:element name="ItemType" type="xs:string"/>
>         <xs:element name="ItemID" type="xs:int"/>
>         <xs:element name="ItemAttributes" minOccurs="0">
>           <xs:complexType>
>             <xs:sequence>
>               <xs:element ref="CreateItemDefinition"/>
>             </xs:sequence>
>           </xs:complexType>
>         </xs:element>
>       </xs:sequence>
>     </xs:complexType>
>   </xs:element>
> </xs:schema>
>
> <xs:element name="CreateResponse" type="xs:int"/>
>
> The WSDL file defines the "Provisioning" port, with only one operation
> "Create".
>
> <definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
>   xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
>   xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/"
>   xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>   xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
>   xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/"
>   xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
>   targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">
>
>   <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
> location="abstract.xsd"/>
>   <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstraction/concrete/"
> location="concrete.xsd"/>
>
>   <message name="CreateRequest">
>     <part name="parameters" element="gb:Create"/>
>   </message>
>
>   <message name="CreateResponse">
>     <part name="parameters" element="gb:CreateResponse"/>
>   </message>
>
>   <portType name="Provisioning">
>     <operation name="Create">
>       <input message="gb:CreateRequest"/>
>       <output message="gb:CreateResponse"/>
>     </operation>
>   </portType>
>
>   <binding name="Provisioning" type="gb:Provisioning">
>     <soap:binding style="document"
> transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
>     <operation name="Create">
>       <soap:operation soapAction="gb#Create" style="document"/>
>       <input>
>         <soap:body use="literal"/>
>       </input>
>       <output>
>         <soap:body use="literal"/>
>       </output>
>     </operation>
>   </binding>
>
>   <service name="Provisioning">
>     <port name="Provisioning" binding="gb:Provisioning">
>       <soap:address
> location="http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning"/>
>     </port>
>   </service>
>
>
> There is only one XSD that I have to write, that is the one defining the
> actual Items that I want to provision (Create Update Delete and Get)
>
> Please note that they are declared as a part of a substitution group
> gb:CreateItemDefinition, matching the "ref" defined in the abstract XML
> schema listed previously,.
>
> <xs:schema
>   targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/"
>   xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/"
>   xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
>   xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
>
>   <xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters"
> substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
>     <xs:complexContent>
>       <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
>         <xs:sequence>
>           <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
>           <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
>         </xs:sequence>
>       </xs:extension>
>     </xs:complexContent>
>   </xs:complexType>
>
>   <xs:complexType
>     name="CreateDigitalCameraParameters"
> substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
>     <xs:complexContent>
>       <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
>         <xs:sequence>
>           <xs:element name="megapixels" type="xs:int"/>
>         </xs:sequence>
>       </xs:extension>
>     </xs:complexContent>
>   </xs:complexType>
> </xs:schema>
>
> I run WSDL2Java on the WSDL file
>
>         wsdl2java -S -s -W -D -a -o src\ web\abstract.wsdl
>
> ...  successfully. Everything looks very nice. CreateConmputerParameters are
> generated to extend the abstract class.
>
> Generated files are listed here.
>
> Directory of C-.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\concrete
>
> 23.01.2006  11:21    <DIR>          .
> 23.01.2006  11:21    <DIR>          ..
> 23.01.2006  11:21             4573 CreateComputerParameters.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21             3730 CreateDigitalCameraParameters.java
>                2 File(s)          8303 bytes
>
>  Directory of C:\.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract
>
> 23.01.2006  11:48    <DIR>          .
> 23.01.2006  11:48    <DIR>          ..
> 23.01.2006  11:21             2524 AbstractCreateItemDefinition.java
> 23.01.2006  11:42             6009 Create.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21             4315 CreateItemAttributes.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21             3973 deploy.wsdd
> 23.01.2006  11:21               492 Provisioning_BindingImpl.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21            10686 Provisioning_BindingStub.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21               408 Provisioning_PortType.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21               646 Provisioning_Service.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21             5703 Provisioning_ServiceLocator.java
> 23.01.2006  11:48               901 test.xml
> 23.01.2006  11:21               682 undeploy.wsdd
>
> So I write a test class that invokes a call the service
>
> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
>   {
>     final String nsURI =
> "http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/";
>     final String serviceName = "Provisioning";
>     final String endPointURI =
> "http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning";
>     final String wsdlURI = "http://localhost:8888/axis/abstract.wsdl";
>
>     ServiceFactory serviceFactory = ServiceFactory.newInstance();
>     Service provisioningService = serviceFactory.createService(new
> URL(wsdlURI), new QName(nsURI, serviceName));
>     Provisioning_BindingStub stub = new Provisioning_BindingStub(new
> URL(endPointURI), provisioningService);
>
>     final int mhz = 3600;
>     final int mbRam = 1024;
>
>      // This is the really interesting line
>
>     Create createComputer = new Create("itemtype@computer", 1, new Crea
> teItemAttributes(new CreateComputerParameters(mhz, mbRam)));
>
>     stub.create(createComputer);
>
>   }
>
> I deploy the service
>
> adminclient -l http://localhost:9999/axis/services/AdminService
> src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract\deploy.wsdd
>
> Now the trouble arrives... The Axis client side does not serialize my
> request object correctly. It does not recognize that I've actually
> constructed my "create" message with a CreateComputerParameters, but uses
> the abstract class as a base for Serialization.
>
> xis/services/Provisioning HTTP/1.0
> Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
> Accept: application/soap+xml, application/dime, multipart/related, text/*
> User-Agent: Axis/1.3
> Host: localhost:8888
> Cache-Control: no-cache
> Pragma: no-cache
> SOAPAction: "gb#Create"
> Content-Length: 543
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
>   <soapenv:Body>
>     <Create xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">
>       <ItemType xmlns="">itemtype@computer</ItemType>
>       <ItemID xmlns="">1</ItemID>
>       <ItemAttributes xmlns="">
>         <ns1:CreateItemDefinition
> xmlns:ns1="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"/>
>       </ItemAttributes>
>     </Create>
> </soapenv:Body>
>
> As you can see, the "Create" element has a nested "ItemAttributes" element,
> that again nest a "CreateItemDefinition" instead of the
> "CreateComputerParameters" that should have been serialized.
>
> Is this setup too complex for Axis to handle? Is this setup just to compelx
> in general? Should I call the standards department at my customer's company
> and tell them to re-define the provisioning standard so it is possible to
> implement it ?
>
> All Advice are welcome !
>
> Best regards,
>
> Glenn Bech
>
>
>
>
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/

Client side serialization of abstract types. (Was: Complex problem)

Posted by glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no>.
I Have a WSDL

 

<definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"

  xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"

  xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/"

  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"

  xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"

  xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/"

  xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"

  targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">

 

  <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
location="abstract.xsd"/>

  <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstraction/concrete/"
location="concrete.xsd"/>

 

  <message name="CreateRequest">

    <part name="parameters" element="gb:Create"/>

  </message>

  <message name="CreateResponse">

    <part name="parameters" element="gb:CreateResponse"/>

  </message>

  <portType name="Provisioning">

    <operation name="create">

      <input message="gb:CreateRequest"/>

      <output message="gb:CreateResponse"/>

    </operation>

  </portType>

  <binding name="Provisioning" type="gb:Provisioning">

    <soap:binding style="document"
transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>

    <operation name="create">

      <soap:operation soapAction="gb#Create" style="document"/>

      <input>

        <soap:body use="literal"/>

      </input>

      <output>

        <soap:body use="literal"/>

      </output>

    </operation>

  </binding>

  <service name="Provisioning">

    <port name="Provisioning" binding="gb:Provisioning">

      <soap:address
location="http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning"/>

    </port>

  </service>

</definitions>'

 

Abstract.xsd

 

<xs:schema

  targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"

  xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"

  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">

 

  <xs:complexType name="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>

  <xs:element name="CreateItemDefinition"
type="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>

  <xs:element name="CreateResponse" type="xs:int"/>

  <xs:element name="Create">

    <xs:complexType>

      <xs:sequence>

        <xs:element name="ItemType" type="xs:string"/>

        <xs:element name="ItemID" type="xs:int"/>

        <xs:element name="ItemAttributes" minOccurs="0">

          <xs:complexType>

            <xs:sequence>

              <xs:element ref="CreateItemDefinition"/>

            </xs:sequence>

          </xs:complexType>

        </xs:element>

      </xs:sequence>

    </xs:complexType>

  </xs:element>

</xs:schema>

 

Concrete.xsd

 

 

 

 

 

static {

        typeDesc.setXmlType(new
javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract
/", ">>Create>ItemAttributes"));

        org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc elemField = new
org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc();

        elemField.setFieldName("createItemDefinition");

        elemField.setXmlName(new
javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract
/", "CreateItemDefinition"));

        elemField.setXmlType(new
javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract
/", "AbstractCreateItemDefinition"));

        elemField.setNillable(false);

        typeDesc.addFieldDesc(elemField);

 }

 

 

 

 

Glenn Richard Bech
Seniorkonsulent
Mob: 99356459 Tel: 40003325
Lysaker torg 2,  1366 Lysaker

 <http://www.webstep.no/> http://www.webstep.no  
Bergen - Oslo - Stavanger

 

 

  _____  

From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:atmanes@gmail.com] 
Sent: 24. januar 2006 14:21
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Complex problem

 

The use of a substitutionGroup combined with an abstract type allows you to
do what you want: change both the name and type of the element. A
subtitutionGroup allows you to change the name of an element, but the type
of a substitutionGroup element must be the same as the original element, or
it must be derived from type of the original element. Using abstract types
lets you also change the element type.

An alternative solution is to use the <choice> compositor.

If you'd like to read up a little more on substitution groups and abstract
types, see:
http://www.w3schools.com/schema/schema_complex_subst.asp
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#SubsGroups
http://www.zvon.org/xxl/XMLSchemaTutorial/Output/ser_substitution_st0.html
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/11/29/schemas/part1.html?page=7 (page down a
bit)
http://www.xfront.com/ElementHierarchy.html

Regards,
Anne

On 1/24/06, glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no> wrote:

Hi Anne, thank you for looking into my case, I can see from the mailing list
that you're one of the ones pulling the load around here.-)

Anyways ; I realize now that the substitutiongroup attribute belongs to
elements, and not types. Personally, I'm a bit confused about the use of
*both* in my case, the abstract schema I have to work with require me to use
an xs:extension, and put the element in a substitution group. However, it is


"company policy" and I cannot get around it.

Question; Is it "common" to both use Substitution groups and abstract types
as in my case ?

Question; Since substitution groups belong to elements only, I cannot see 
how it affects Axis at all, as to my knowledge the WSDL2Java
generator only spits our classes related to the Types I define, and
I find noe trace in the classe's typedesc's of the substitution groups.

Am I Missing something? 


________________________________________
From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:atmanes@gmail.com]
Sent: 23. januar 2006 14:20
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Complex problem

The substitutionGroup attribute is only valid as part of an element
definition, not as part of a complexType definition.

This:
<xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters" 
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
<xs:complexContent>
  <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
  <xs:sequence>
  <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/> 
  <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
  </xs:sequence>
  </xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>

Should be this:
<xs:element name="CreateComputerParameters" 
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition"
type="tns:CreateComputerParameters"/>
<xs:complexType name="CreateComputeParameters">
<xs:complexContent>
  <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition"> 
  <xs:sequence>
  <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
  <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
  </xs:sequence>
  </xs:extension> 
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>

Anne

On 1/23/06, glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no> wrote:
Hi All,

This is a rather lengthy post, I hope someone will take the time to read it 
through, as I've been struggling with the problem for a while. It describes
a complex, "real life", "business" scenario. This one is for you experts out


there! Novices, please skip this post .) 

Here is a summary; When creating an application with messages involving
abstract schema types and substitution groups, Axis as a client serializes
messages wrong, ignoring the concrete implementations in the serialization 
process using the generated base class for serialization".

I've currently been assigned to create a so called "provisioning" interface
to a company's internal database.

In practice, this means making the existing database modifiable through a 
well defined web services interface. I've been trying out axis, but have
some major issues.

The company impose a "standard" for data provisioning, that manifests itself
as an abstract XML Schema, and an abstract WSDL file. 

The WSDL file define very generic "Update", "Save" , "Delete" and "Create"
messages. It does not specify "what" to "Update", "Save", "Delete" etc. That


is deferred to implementations like mine. I've created an identical setup,
since I cannot reveal the identity of my customer.

First of all, there is a very generic XSD file that I cannot modify, It's
part of company policy.

It defines a complex type, "AbstractCreateItemDefinition". This is the base
message type for all messages that "create" items in the system.

The idea is to "extend" this Abstract type with create messages for real 
items, i.e CreateComputerDefinition, CreateVacumCleanerDefinition.

Please also notice the ref="CreateItemDefinition", this is the "magic" that
lets us put in any element that "extends" AbstractCreateDefinition here. 

<xs:schema
targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
xmlns=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">

<xs:complexType name="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/> 
<xs:element name="CreateItemDefinition"
type="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>

<xs:element name="Create">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence> 
<xs:element name="ItemType" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:element name="ItemID" type="xs:int"/>
<xs:element name="ItemAttributes" minOccurs="0"> 
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="CreateItemDefinition"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType> 
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>

<xs:element name="CreateResponse" type="xs:int"/>

The WSDL file defines the "Provisioning" port, with only one operation
"Create". 

<definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/ "
xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema "
xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/ "
xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
targetNamespace=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">

<import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
location="abstract.xsd"/>
<import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstraction/concrete/"
location="concrete.xsd"/> 

<message name="CreateRequest">
<part name="parameters" element="gb:Create"/>
</message>

<message name="CreateResponse">
<part name="parameters" element="gb:CreateResponse"/> 
</message>

<portType name="Provisioning">
<operation name="Create">
<input message="gb:CreateRequest"/>
<output message="gb:CreateResponse"/> 
</operation>
</portType>

<binding name="Provisioning" type="gb:Provisioning">
<soap:binding style="document"
transport=" http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
<operation name="Create">
<soap:operation soapAction="gb#Create" style="document"/>
<input>
<soap:body use="literal"/> 
</input>
<output>
<soap:body use="literal"/>
</output>
</operation>
</binding>

<service name="Provisioning">
<port name="Provisioning" binding="gb:Provisioning"> 
<soap:address
location="http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning "/>
</port>
</service>


There is only one XSD that I have to write, that is the one defining the 
actual Items that I want to provision (Create Update Delete and Get)

Please note that they are declared as a part of a substitution group
gb:CreateItemDefinition, matching the "ref" defined in the abstract XML 
schema listed previously,.

<xs:schema
targetNamespace=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/"
xmlns=" <http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/>
http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/ "
xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
xmlns:xs=" <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema>
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema ">

<xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition"> 
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
<xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>

<xs:complexType
name="CreateDigitalCameraParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="megapixels" type="xs:int"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent> 
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>

I run WSDL2Java on the WSDL file

wsdl2java -S -s -W -D -a -o src\ web\abstract.wsdl

...successfully. Everything looks very nice. CreateConmputerParameters are 
generated to extend the abstract class.

Generated files are listed here.

Directory of C-.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\concrete

23.01.200611:21<DIR>.
23.01.200611:21<DIR>.. 
23.01.200611:21 4573 CreateComputerParameters.java
23.01.200611:21 3730 CreateDigitalCameraParameters.java
2 File(s)8303 bytes

Directory of C:\.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract

23.01.200611:48<DIR>.
23.01.200611:48<DIR>..
23.01.200611:21 2524 AbstractCreateItemDefinition.java
23.01.200611:42 6009 Create.java
23.01.200611:21 4315 CreateItemAttributes.java
23.01.200611:21 3973 deploy.wsdd
23.01.200611:21 492 Provisioning_BindingImpl.java
23.01.200611:2110686 Provisioning_BindingStub.java
23.01.200611:21 408 Provisioning_PortType.java
23.01.200611:21 646 Provisioning_Service.java
23.01.200611:21 5703 Provisioning_ServiceLocator.java
23.01.200611:48 901 test.xml
23.01.200611:21 682 undeploy.wsdd

So I write a test class that invokes a call the service

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception 
{
final String nsURI =
" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/";
final String serviceName = "Provisioning";
final String endPointURI =
" http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning";
final String wsdlURI = " <http://localhost:8888/axis/abstract.wsdl>
http://localhost:8888/axis/abstract.wsdl";

ServiceFactory serviceFactory = ServiceFactory.newInstance();
Service provisioningService = serviceFactory.createService(new
URL(wsdlURI), new QName(nsURI, serviceName)); 
Provisioning_BindingStub stub = new Provisioning_BindingStub(new
URL(endPointURI), provisioningService);

final int mhz = 3600;
final int mbRam = 1024;

// This is the really interesting line

Create createComputer = new Create("itemtype@computer ", 1, new Crea
teItemAttributes(new CreateComputerParameters(mhz, mbRam)));

stub.create(createComputer);

}

I deploy the service

adminclient -l http://localhost:9999/axis/services/AdminService
src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract\deploy.wsdd

Now the trouble arrives... The Axis client side does not serialize my 
request object correctly. It does not recognize that I've actually
constructed my "create" message with a CreateComputerParameters, but uses
the abstract class as a base for Serialization.

xis/services/Provisioning HTTP/1.0 
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Accept: application/soap+xml, application/dime, multipart/related, text/*
User-Agent: Axis/1.3
Host: localhost:8888
Cache-Control: no-cache
Pragma: no-cache
SOAPAction: "gb#Create" 
Content-Length: 543

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ "
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance ">
<soapenv:Body>
<Create xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">
<ItemType xmlns=""> itemtype@computer</ItemType>
<ItemID xmlns="">1</ItemID>
<ItemAttributes xmlns="">
<ns1:CreateItemDefinition
xmlns:ns1=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"/>
</ItemAttributes>
</Create>
</soapenv:Body>

As you can see, the "Create" element has a nested "ItemAttributes" element, 
that again nest a "CreateItemDefinition" instead of the
"CreateComputerParameters" that should have been serialized.

Is this setup too complex for Axis to handle? Is this setup just to compelx 
in general? Should I call the standards department at my customer's company
and tell them to re-define the provisioning standard so it is possible to
implement it ?

All Advice are welcome !

Best regards, 

Glenn Bech







 


Re: Complex problem

Posted by Anne Thomas Manes <at...@gmail.com>.
The use of a substitutionGroup combined with an abstract type allows you to
do what you want: change both the name and type of the element. A
subtitutionGroup allows you to change the name of an element, but the type
of a substitutionGroup element must be the same as the original element, or
it must be derived from type of the original element. Using abstract types
lets you also change the element type.

An alternative solution is to use the <choice> compositor.

If you'd like to read up a little more on substitution groups and abstract
types, see:
http://www.w3schools.com/schema/schema_complex_subst.asp
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#SubsGroups
http://www.zvon.org/xxl/XMLSchemaTutorial/Output/ser_substitution_st0.html
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/11/29/schemas/part1.html?page=7 (page down a
bit)
http://www.xfront.com/ElementHierarchy.html

Regards,
Anne

On 1/24/06, glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no> wrote:
>
> Hi Anne, thank you for looking into my case, I can see from the mailing
> list
> that you're one of the ones pulling the load around here.-)
>
> Anyways ; I realize now that the substitutiongroup attribute belongs to
> elements, and not types. Personally, I'm a bit confused about the use of
> *both* in my case, the abstract schema I have to work with require me to
> use
> an xs:extension, and put the element in a substitution group. However, it
> is
>
> "company policy" and I cannot get around it.
>
> Question; Is it "common" to both use Substitution groups and abstract
> types
> as in my case ?
>
> Question; Since substitution groups belong to elements only, I cannot see
> how it affects Axis at all, as to my knowledge the WSDL2Java
> generator only spits our classes related to the Types I define, and
> I find noe trace in the classe's typedesc's of the substitution groups.
>
> Am I Missing something?
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:atmanes@gmail.com]
> Sent: 23. januar 2006 14:20
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Complex problem
>
> The substitutionGroup attribute is only valid as part of an element
> definition, not as part of a complexType definition.
>
> This:
> <xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters"
> substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
> <xs:complexContent>
>   <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
>   <xs:sequence>
>   <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
>   <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
>   </xs:sequence>
>   </xs:extension>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> Should be this:
> <xs:element name="CreateComputerParameters"
> substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition"
> type="tns:CreateComputerParameters"/>
> <xs:complexType name="CreateComputeParameters">
> <xs:complexContent>
>   <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
>   <xs:sequence>
>   <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
>   <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
>   </xs:sequence>
>   </xs:extension>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> Anne
>
> On 1/23/06, glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a rather lengthy post, I hope someone will take the time to read
> it
> through, as I've been struggling with the problem for a while. It
> describes
> a complex, "real life", "business" scenario. This one is for you experts
> out
>
>
> there! Novices, please skip this post .)
>
> Here is a summary; When creating an application with messages involving
> abstract schema types and substitution groups, Axis as a client serializes
> messages wrong, ignoring the concrete implementations in the serialization
> process using the generated base class for serialization".
>
> I've currently been assigned to create a so called "provisioning"
> interface
> to a company's internal database.
>
> In practice, this means making the existing database modifiable through a
> well defined web services interface. I've been trying out axis, but have
> some major issues.
>
> The company impose a "standard" for data provisioning, that manifests
> itself
> as an abstract XML Schema, and an abstract WSDL file.
>
> The WSDL file define very generic "Update", "Save" , "Delete" and "Create"
> messages. It does not specify "what" to "Update", "Save", "Delete" etc.
> That
>
> is deferred to implementations like mine. I've created an identical setup,
> since I cannot reveal the identity of my customer.
>
> First of all, there is a very generic XSD file that I cannot modify, It's
> part of company policy.
>
> It defines a complex type, "AbstractCreateItemDefinition". This is the
> base
> message type for all messages that "create" items in the system.
>
> The idea is to "extend" this Abstract type with create messages for real
> items, i.e CreateComputerDefinition, CreateVacumCleanerDefinition.
>
> Please also notice the ref="CreateItemDefinition", this is the "magic"
> that
> lets us put in any element that "extends" AbstractCreateDefinition here.
>
> <xs:schema
> targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
> xmlns=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
>
> <xs:complexType name="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>
> <xs:element name="CreateItemDefinition"
> type="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>
>
> <xs:element name="Create">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element name="ItemType" type="xs:string"/>
> <xs:element name="ItemID" type="xs:int"/>
> <xs:element name="ItemAttributes" minOccurs="0">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element ref="CreateItemDefinition"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
> </xs:schema>
>
> <xs:element name="CreateResponse" type="xs:int"/>
>
> The WSDL file defines the "Provisioning" port, with only one operation
> "Create".
>
> <definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
> xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/ "
> xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/"
> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema "
> xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
> xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/ "
> xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
> targetNamespace=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">
>
> <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
> location="abstract.xsd"/>
> <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstraction/concrete/"
> location="concrete.xsd"/>
>
> <message name="CreateRequest">
> <part name="parameters" element="gb:Create"/>
> </message>
>
> <message name="CreateResponse">
> <part name="parameters" element="gb:CreateResponse"/>
> </message>
>
> <portType name="Provisioning">
> <operation name="Create">
> <input message="gb:CreateRequest"/>
> <output message="gb:CreateResponse"/>
> </operation>
> </portType>
>
> <binding name="Provisioning" type="gb:Provisioning">
> <soap:binding style="document"
> transport=" http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
> <operation name="Create">
> <soap:operation soapAction="gb#Create" style="document"/>
> <input>
> <soap:body use="literal"/>
> </input>
> <output>
> <soap:body use="literal"/>
> </output>
> </operation>
> </binding>
>
> <service name="Provisioning">
> <port name="Provisioning" binding="gb:Provisioning">
> <soap:address
> location="http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning "/>
> </port>
> </service>
>
>
> There is only one XSD that I have to write, that is the one defining the
> actual Items that I want to provision (Create Update Delete and Get)
>
> Please note that they are declared as a part of a substitution group
> gb:CreateItemDefinition, matching the "ref" defined in the abstract XML
> schema listed previously,.
>
> <xs:schema
> targetNamespace=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/"
> xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/ "
> xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema ">
>
> <xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters"
> substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
> <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:extension>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> <xs:complexType
> name="CreateDigitalCameraParameters"
> substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element name="megapixels" type="xs:int"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:extension>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:schema>
>
> I run WSDL2Java on the WSDL file
>
> wsdl2java -S -s -W -D -a -o src\ web\abstract.wsdl
>
> ...successfully. Everything looks very nice. CreateConmputerParameters are
> generated to extend the abstract class.
>
> Generated files are listed here.
>
> Directory of C-.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\concrete
>
> 23.01.200611:21<DIR>.
> 23.01.200611:21<DIR>..
> 23.01.200611:21 4573 CreateComputerParameters.java
> 23.01.200611:21 3730 CreateDigitalCameraParameters.java
> 2 File(s)8303 bytes
>
> Directory of C:\.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract
>
> 23.01.200611:48<DIR>.
> 23.01.200611:48<DIR>..
> 23.01.200611:21 2524 AbstractCreateItemDefinition.java
> 23.01.200611:42 6009 Create.java
> 23.01.200611:21 4315 CreateItemAttributes.java
> 23.01.200611:21 3973 deploy.wsdd
> 23.01.200611:21 492 Provisioning_BindingImpl.java
> 23.01.200611:2110686 Provisioning_BindingStub.java
> 23.01.200611:21 408 Provisioning_PortType.java
> 23.01.200611:21 646 Provisioning_Service.java
> 23.01.200611:21 5703 Provisioning_ServiceLocator.java
> 23.01.200611:48 901 test.xml
> 23.01.200611:21 682 undeploy.wsdd
>
> So I write a test class that invokes a call the service
>
> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
> {
> final String nsURI =
> " http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/";
> final String serviceName = "Provisioning";
> final String endPointURI =
> " http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning";
> final String wsdlURI = "http://localhost:8888/axis/abstract.wsdl";
>
> ServiceFactory serviceFactory = ServiceFactory.newInstance();
> Service provisioningService = serviceFactory.createService(new
> URL(wsdlURI), new QName(nsURI, serviceName));
> Provisioning_BindingStub stub = new Provisioning_BindingStub(new
> URL(endPointURI), provisioningService);
>
> final int mhz = 3600;
> final int mbRam = 1024;
>
> // This is the really interesting line
>
> Create createComputer = new Create("itemtype@computer ", 1, new Crea
> teItemAttributes(new CreateComputerParameters(mhz, mbRam)));
>
> stub.create(createComputer);
>
> }
>
> I deploy the service
>
> adminclient -l http://localhost:9999/axis/services/AdminService
> src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract\deploy.wsdd
>
> Now the trouble arrives... The Axis client side does not serialize my
> request object correctly. It does not recognize that I've actually
> constructed my "create" message with a CreateComputerParameters, but uses
> the abstract class as a base for Serialization.
>
> xis/services/Provisioning HTTP/1.0
> Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
> Accept: application/soap+xml, application/dime, multipart/related, text/*
> User-Agent: Axis/1.3
> Host: localhost:8888
> Cache-Control: no-cache
> Pragma: no-cache
> SOAPAction: "gb#Create"
> Content-Length: 543
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/
> "
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
> <soapenv:Body>
> <Create xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">
> <ItemType xmlns=""> itemtype@computer</ItemType>
> <ItemID xmlns="">1</ItemID>
> <ItemAttributes xmlns="">
> <ns1:CreateItemDefinition
> xmlns:ns1=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"/>
> </ItemAttributes>
> </Create>
> </soapenv:Body>
>
> As you can see, the "Create" element has a nested "ItemAttributes"
> element,
> that again nest a "CreateItemDefinition" instead of the
> "CreateComputerParameters" that should have been serialized.
>
> Is this setup too complex for Axis to handle? Is this setup just to
> compelx
> in general? Should I call the standards department at my customer's
> company
> and tell them to re-define the provisioning standard so it is possible to
> implement it ?
>
> All Advice are welcome !
>
> Best regards,
>
> Glenn Bech
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

RE: Complex problem

Posted by glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no>.
Hi Anne, thank you for looking into my case, I can see from the mailing list
that you’re one of the ones pulling the load around here.-)

Anyways ; I realize now that the substitutiongroup attribute belongs to
elements, and not types. Personally, I'm a bit confused about the use of
*both* in my case, the abstract schema I have to work with require me to use
an xs:extension, and put the element in a substitution group. However, it is

"company policy" and I cannot get around it. 

Question; Is it "common" to both use Substitution groups and abstract types 
as in my case ?

Question; Since substitution groups belong to elements only, I cannot see
how it affects Axis at all, as to my knowledge the WSDL2Java 
generator only spits our classes related to the Types I define, and 
I find noe trace in the classe's typedesc's of the substitution groups. 

Am I Missing something? 
 
 
________________________________________
From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:atmanes@gmail.com] 
Sent: 23. januar 2006 14:20
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Complex problem

The substitutionGroup attribute is only valid as part of an element
definition, not as part of a complexType definition. 

This:
  <xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
   <xs:complexContent>
     <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
       <xs:sequence>
         <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/> 
         <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
       </xs:sequence>
     </xs:extension>
   </xs:complexContent>
 </xs:complexType>

Should be this:
<xs:element name="CreateComputerParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition" 
type="tns:CreateComputerParameters"/>
<xs:complexType name="CreateComputeParameters">
   <xs:complexContent>
     <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
       <xs:sequence>
         <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/> 
         <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
       </xs:sequence>
     </xs:extension>
   </xs:complexContent>
 </xs:complexType>

Anne

On 1/23/06, glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no> wrote:
Hi All,

This is a rather lengthy post, I hope someone will take the time to read it
through, as I've been struggling with the problem for a while. It describes
a complex, "real life", "business" scenario. This one is for you experts out


there! Novices, please skip this post .)

Here is a summary; When creating an application with messages involving
abstract schema types and substitution groups, Axis as a client serializes
messages wrong, ignoring the concrete implementations in the serialization 
process using the generated base class for serialization".

I've currently been assigned to create a so called "provisioning" interface
to a company's internal database.

In practice, this means making the existing database modifiable through a 
well defined web services interface. I've been trying out axis, but have
some major issues.

The company impose a "standard" for data provisioning, that manifests itself
as an abstract XML Schema, and an abstract WSDL file. 

The WSDL file define very generic "Update", "Save" , "Delete" and "Create"
messages. It does not specify "what" to "Update", "Save", "Delete" etc. That

is deferred to implementations like mine. I've created an identical setup,
since I cannot reveal the identity of my customer.

First of all, there is a very generic XSD file that I cannot modify, It's
part of company policy. 

It defines a complex type, "AbstractCreateItemDefinition". This is the base
message type for all messages that "create" items in the system.

The idea is to "extend" this Abstract type with create messages for real 
items, i.e CreateComputerDefinition, CreateVacumCleanerDefinition.

Please also notice the ref="CreateItemDefinition", this is the "magic" that
lets us put in any element that "extends" AbstractCreateDefinition here. 

<xs:schema
  targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
  xmlns=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">

  <xs:complexType name="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/> 
  <xs:element name="CreateItemDefinition"
type="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>

  <xs:element name="Create">
    <xs:complexType>
      <xs:sequence>
        <xs:element name="ItemType" type="xs:string"/>
        <xs:element name="ItemID" type="xs:int"/>
        <xs:element name="ItemAttributes" minOccurs="0"> 
          <xs:complexType>
            <xs:sequence>
              <xs:element ref="CreateItemDefinition"/>
            </xs:sequence>
          </xs:complexType>
        </xs:element>
      </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>
  </xs:element> 
</xs:schema>

<xs:element name="CreateResponse" type="xs:int"/>

The WSDL file defines the "Provisioning" port, with only one operation
"Create".

<definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
  xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/ "
  xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/"
  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema "
  xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
  xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/ "
  xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
  targetNamespace=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">

  <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/" 
location="abstract.xsd"/>
  <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstraction/concrete/"
location="concrete.xsd"/> 

  <message name="CreateRequest">
    <part name="parameters" element="gb:Create"/>
  </message>

  <message name="CreateResponse">
    <part name="parameters" element="gb:CreateResponse"/> 
  </message>

  <portType name="Provisioning">
    <operation name="Create">
      <input message="gb:CreateRequest"/>
      <output message="gb:CreateResponse"/> 
    </operation>
  </portType>

  <binding name="Provisioning" type="gb:Provisioning">
    <soap:binding style="document"
transport=" http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
    <operation name="Create">
      <soap:operation soapAction="gb#Create" style="document"/>
      <input>
        <soap:body use="literal"/> 
      </input>
      <output>
        <soap:body use="literal"/>
      </output>
    </operation>
  </binding>

  <service name="Provisioning"> 
    <port name="Provisioning" binding="gb:Provisioning">
      <soap:address
location="http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning "/>
    </port>
  </service>


There is only one XSD that I have to write, that is the one defining the
actual Items that I want to provision (Create Update Delete and Get)

Please note that they are declared as a part of a substitution group
gb:CreateItemDefinition, matching the "ref" defined in the abstract XML
schema listed previously,.

<xs:schema
  targetNamespace=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/"
  xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/ "
  xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema ">

  <xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
    <xs:complexContent>
      <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition"> 
        <xs:sequence>
          <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
          <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
        </xs:sequence> 
      </xs:extension>
    </xs:complexContent>
  </xs:complexType>

  <xs:complexType
    name="CreateDigitalCameraParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition"> 
    <xs:complexContent>
      <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
        <xs:sequence>
          <xs:element name="megapixels" type="xs:int"/> 
        </xs:sequence>
      </xs:extension>
    </xs:complexContent>
  </xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>

I run WSDL2Java on the WSDL file

        wsdl2java -S -s -W -D -a -o src\ web\abstract.wsdl 

...  successfully. Everything looks very nice. CreateConmputerParameters are
generated to extend the abstract class.

Generated files are listed here.

Directory of C-.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\concrete 

23.01.2006  11:21    <DIR>          .
23.01.2006  11:21    <DIR>          ..
23.01.2006  11:21             4573 CreateComputerParameters.java
23.01.2006  11:21             3730 CreateDigitalCameraParameters.java
               2 File(s)          8303 bytes

Directory of C:\.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract

23.01.2006  11:48    <DIR>          .
23.01.2006  11:48    <DIR>          ..
23.01.2006  11:21             2524 AbstractCreateItemDefinition.java
23.01.2006  11:42             6009 Create.java
23.01.2006  11:21             4315 CreateItemAttributes.java
23.01.2006  11:21             3973 deploy.wsdd
23.01.2006  11:21               492 Provisioning_BindingImpl.java
23.01.2006  11:21            10686 Provisioning_BindingStub.java
23.01.2006  11:21               408 Provisioning_PortType.java
23.01.2006  11:21               646 Provisioning_Service.java
23.01.2006  11:21             5703 Provisioning_ServiceLocator.java
23.01.2006  11:48               901 test.xml
23.01.2006  11:21               682 undeploy.wsdd

So I write a test class that invokes a call the service

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
  {
    final String nsURI =
" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/";
    final String serviceName = "Provisioning";
    final String endPointURI =
" http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning";
    final String wsdlURI = "http://localhost:8888/axis/abstract.wsdl";

    ServiceFactory serviceFactory = ServiceFactory.newInstance();
    Service provisioningService = serviceFactory.createService(new
URL(wsdlURI), new QName(nsURI, serviceName));
    Provisioning_BindingStub stub = new Provisioning_BindingStub(new
URL(endPointURI), provisioningService);

    final int mhz = 3600;
    final int mbRam = 1024;

     // This is the really interesting line

    Create createComputer = new Create("itemtype@computer ", 1, new Crea
teItemAttributes(new CreateComputerParameters(mhz, mbRam)));

    stub.create(createComputer);

  }

I deploy the service

adminclient -l http://localhost:9999/axis/services/AdminService
src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract\deploy.wsdd

Now the trouble arrives... The Axis client side does not serialize my
request object correctly. It does not recognize that I've actually 
constructed my "create" message with a CreateComputerParameters, but uses
the abstract class as a base for Serialization.

xis/services/Provisioning HTTP/1.0
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 
Accept: application/soap+xml, application/dime, multipart/related, text/*
User-Agent: Axis/1.3
Host: localhost:8888
Cache-Control: no-cache
Pragma: no-cache
SOAPAction: "gb#Create"
Content-Length: 543 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> 
  <soapenv:Body>
    <Create xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">
      <ItemType xmlns=""> itemtype@computer</ItemType>
      <ItemID xmlns="">1</ItemID>
      <ItemAttributes xmlns="">
        <ns1:CreateItemDefinition
xmlns:ns1=" http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"/>
      </ItemAttributes>
    </Create>
</soapenv:Body>

As you can see, the "Create" element has a nested "ItemAttributes" element, 
that again nest a "CreateItemDefinition" instead of the
"CreateComputerParameters" that should have been serialized.

Is this setup too complex for Axis to handle? Is this setup just to compelx 
in general? Should I call the standards department at my customer's company
and tell them to re-define the provisioning standard so it is possible to
implement it ?

All Advice are welcome !

Best regards, 

Glenn Bech





Re: Complex problem

Posted by Anne Thomas Manes <at...@gmail.com>.
The substitutionGroup attribute is only valid as part of an element
definition, not as part of a complexType definition.

This:
  <xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
   <xs:complexContent>
     <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
       <xs:sequence>
         <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
         <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
       </xs:sequence>
     </xs:extension>
   </xs:complexContent>
 </xs:complexType>

Should be this:

<xs:element name="CreateComputerParameters"
substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition"
type="tns:CreateComputerParameters"/>
<xs:complexType name="CreateComputeParameters">
   <xs:complexContent>
     <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
       <xs:sequence>
         <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
         <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
       </xs:sequence>
     </xs:extension>
   </xs:complexContent>
 </xs:complexType>

Anne

On 1/23/06, glenn bech <gl...@webstep.no> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is a rather lengthy post, I hope someone will take the time to read
> it
> through, as I've been struggling with the problem for a while. It
> describes
> a complex, "real life", "business" scenario. This one is for you experts
> out
>
> there! Novices, please skip this post .)
>
> Here is a summary; When creating an application with messages involving
> abstract schema types and substitution groups, Axis as a client serializes
> messages wrong, ignoring the concrete implementations in the serialization
> process using the generated base class for serialization".
>
> I've currently been assigned to create a so called "provisioning"
> interface
> to a company's internal database.
>
> In practice, this means making the existing database modifiable through a
> well defined web services interface. I've been trying out axis, but have
> some major issues.
>
> The company impose a "standard" for data provisioning, that manifests
> itself
> as an abstract XML Schema, and an abstract WSDL file.
>
> The WSDL file define very generic "Update", "Save" , "Delete" and "Create"
> messages. It does not specify "what" to "Update", "Save", "Delete" etc.
> That
> is deferred to implementations like mine. I've created an identical setup,
> since I cannot reveal the identity of my customer.
>
> First of all, there is a very generic XSD file that I cannot modify, It's
> part of company policy.
>
> It defines a complex type, "AbstractCreateItemDefinition". This is the
> base
> message type for all messages that "create" items in the system.
>
> The idea is to "extend" this Abstract type with create messages for real
> items, i.e CreateComputerDefinition, CreateVacumCleanerDefinition.
>
> Please also notice the ref="CreateItemDefinition", this is the "magic"
> that
> lets us put in any element that "extends" AbstractCreateDefinition here.
>
> <xs:schema
>   targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
>   xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
>   xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
>
>   <xs:complexType name="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>
>   <xs:element name="CreateItemDefinition"
> type="AbstractCreateItemDefinition" abstract="true"/>
>
>   <xs:element name="Create">
>     <xs:complexType>
>       <xs:sequence>
>         <xs:element name="ItemType" type="xs:string"/>
>         <xs:element name="ItemID" type="xs:int"/>
>         <xs:element name="ItemAttributes" minOccurs="0">
>           <xs:complexType>
>             <xs:sequence>
>               <xs:element ref="CreateItemDefinition"/>
>             </xs:sequence>
>           </xs:complexType>
>         </xs:element>
>       </xs:sequence>
>     </xs:complexType>
>   </xs:element>
> </xs:schema>
>
> <xs:element name="CreateResponse" type="xs:int"/>
>
> The WSDL file defines the "Provisioning" port, with only one operation
> "Create".
>
> <definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
>   xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
>   xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/"
>   xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>   xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
>   xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/"
>   xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
>   targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">
>
>   <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
> location="abstract.xsd"/>
>   <import namespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstraction/concrete/"
> location="concrete.xsd"/>
>
>   <message name="CreateRequest">
>     <part name="parameters" element="gb:Create"/>
>   </message>
>
>   <message name="CreateResponse">
>     <part name="parameters" element="gb:CreateResponse"/>
>   </message>
>
>   <portType name="Provisioning">
>     <operation name="Create">
>       <input message="gb:CreateRequest"/>
>       <output message="gb:CreateResponse"/>
>     </operation>
>   </portType>
>
>   <binding name="Provisioning" type="gb:Provisioning">
>     <soap:binding style="document"
> transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
>     <operation name="Create">
>       <soap:operation soapAction="gb#Create" style="document"/>
>       <input>
>         <soap:body use="literal"/>
>       </input>
>       <output>
>         <soap:body use="literal"/>
>       </output>
>     </operation>
>   </binding>
>
>   <service name="Provisioning">
>     <port name="Provisioning" binding="gb:Provisioning">
>       <soap:address
> location="http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning"/>
>     </port>
>   </service>
>
>
> There is only one XSD that I have to write, that is the one defining the
> actual Items that I want to provision (Create Update Delete and Get)
>
> Please note that they are declared as a part of a substitution group
> gb:CreateItemDefinition, matching the "ref" defined in the abstract XML
> schema listed previously,.
>
> <xs:schema
>   targetNamespace="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/"
>   xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/concrete/"
>   xmlns:gb="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"
>   xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
>
>   <xs:complexType name="CreateComputerParameters"
> substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
>     <xs:complexContent>
>       <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
>         <xs:sequence>
>           <xs:element name="cpu_speed" type="xs:int"/>
>           <xs:element name="mb_ram" type="xs:int"/>
>         </xs:sequence>
>       </xs:extension>
>     </xs:complexContent>
>   </xs:complexType>
>
>   <xs:complexType
>     name="CreateDigitalCameraParameters"
> substitutionGroup="gb:CreateItemDefinition">
>     <xs:complexContent>
>       <xs:extension base="gb:AbstractCreateItemDefinition">
>         <xs:sequence>
>           <xs:element name="megapixels" type="xs:int"/>
>         </xs:sequence>
>       </xs:extension>
>     </xs:complexContent>
>   </xs:complexType>
> </xs:schema>
>
> I run WSDL2Java on the WSDL file
>
>         wsdl2java -S -s -W -D -a -o src\ web\abstract.wsdl
>
> ...  successfully. Everything looks very nice. CreateConmputerParameters
> are
> generated to extend the abstract class.
>
> Generated files are listed here.
>
> Directory of C-.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\concrete
>
> 23.01.2006  11:21    <DIR>          .
> 23.01.2006  11:21    <DIR>          ..
> 23.01.2006  11:21             4573 CreateComputerParameters.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21             3730 CreateDigitalCameraParameters.java
>                2 File(s)          8303 bytes
>
> Directory of C:\.....\src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract
>
> 23.01.2006  11:48    <DIR>          .
> 23.01.2006  11:48    <DIR>          ..
> 23.01.2006  11:21             2524 AbstractCreateItemDefinition.java
> 23.01.2006  11:42             6009 Create.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21             4315 CreateItemAttributes.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21             3973 deploy.wsdd
> 23.01.2006  11:21               492 Provisioning_BindingImpl.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21            10686 Provisioning_BindingStub.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21               408 Provisioning_PortType.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21               646 Provisioning_Service.java
> 23.01.2006  11:21             5703 Provisioning_ServiceLocator.java
> 23.01.2006  11:48               901 test.xml
> 23.01.2006  11:21               682 undeploy.wsdd
>
> So I write a test class that invokes a call the service
>
> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
>   {
>     final String nsURI =
> "http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/";
>     final String serviceName = "Provisioning";
>     final String endPointURI =
> "http://localhost:8888/axis/services/Provisioning";
>     final String wsdlURI = "http://localhost:8888/axis/abstract.wsdl";
>
>     ServiceFactory serviceFactory = ServiceFactory.newInstance();
>     Service provisioningService = serviceFactory.createService(new
> URL(wsdlURI), new QName(nsURI, serviceName));
>     Provisioning_BindingStub stub = new Provisioning_BindingStub(new
> URL(endPointURI), provisioningService);
>
>     final int mhz = 3600;
>     final int mbRam = 1024;
>
>      // This is the really interesting line
>
>     Create createComputer = new Create("itemtype@computer", 1, new Crea
> teItemAttributes(new CreateComputerParameters(mhz, mbRam)));
>
>     stub.create(createComputer);
>
>   }
>
> I deploy the service
>
> adminclient -l http://localhost:9999/axis/services/AdminService
> src\com\glennbech\www\abstractiontest\_abstract\deploy.wsdd
>
> Now the trouble arrives... The Axis client side does not serialize my
> request object correctly. It does not recognize that I've actually
> constructed my "create" message with a CreateComputerParameters, but uses
> the abstract class as a base for Serialization.
>
> xis/services/Provisioning HTTP/1.0
> Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
> Accept: application/soap+xml, application/dime, multipart/related, text/*
> User-Agent: Axis/1.3
> Host: localhost:8888
> Cache-Control: no-cache
> Pragma: no-cache
> SOAPAction: "gb#Create"
> Content-Length: 543
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/
> "
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
>   <soapenv:Body>
>     <Create xmlns="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/">
>       <ItemType xmlns="">itemtype@computer</ItemType>
>       <ItemID xmlns="">1</ItemID>
>       <ItemAttributes xmlns="">
>         <ns1:CreateItemDefinition
> xmlns:ns1="http://www.glennbech.com/abstractiontest/abstract/"/>
>       </ItemAttributes>
>     </Create>
> </soapenv:Body>
>
> As you can see, the "Create" element has a nested "ItemAttributes"
> element,
> that again nest a "CreateItemDefinition" instead of the
> "CreateComputerParameters" that should have been serialized.
>
> Is this setup too complex for Axis to handle? Is this setup just to
> compelx
> in general? Should I call the standards department at my customer's
> company
> and tell them to re-define the provisioning standard so it is possible to
> implement it ?
>
> All Advice are welcome !
>
> Best regards,
>
> Glenn Bech
>
>
>
>
>