You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by li li <di...@hotmail.com> on 2018/11/05 02:25:13 UTC

cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

HI ALL

I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM or XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN

Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

Posted by Sergey Levitskiy <se...@hotmail.com>.
PVLAN is supported although there are some prerequisites
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/archived-cloudstack-administration/en/latest/networking_and_traffic.html#isolation-in-advanced-zone-using-private-vlan


On 11/4/18, 7:05 PM, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <ku...@bw-sw.com> wrote:

    Probably MAC-based VLANs and custom scripting will work for you.
    
    вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:04, li li <di...@hotmail.com>:
    
    > Hi Ivan
    >
    >
    >
    > my target is:
    >
    > 1. All the user VM cannot reach other user VM.
    >
    > 2. All the user VM can reach SMB server and Gateway.
    >
    >
    >
    > Any good suggestions?
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > 发件人: Ivan Kudryavtsev <ku...@bw-sw.com>
    > 发送时间: Monday, November 5, 2018 10:32:23 AM
    > 收件人: users
    > 主题: Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?
    >
    > Hi Li,
    > Doesn't look like it's supported. Actually, CloudStack supports isolated
    > networks in advanced zones which support the feature above by creation of
    > isolated VLAN for every network with the dedicated virtual router and other
    > stuff.
    >
    > вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 21:25, li li <di...@hotmail.com>:
    >
    > > HI ALL
    > >
    > > I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is
    > > CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM
    > or
    > > XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
    > >
    >
    >
    > --
    > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
    > Bitworks LLC
    > Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
    > Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
    > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
    >
    
    
    -- 
    With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
    Bitworks LLC
    Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
    Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
    WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>

Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

Posted by Ivan Kudryavtsev <ku...@bw-sw.com>.
Probably MAC-based VLANs and custom scripting will work for you.

вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:04, li li <di...@hotmail.com>:

> Hi Ivan
>
>
>
> my target is:
>
> 1. All the user VM cannot reach other user VM.
>
> 2. All the user VM can reach SMB server and Gateway.
>
>
>
> Any good suggestions?
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> 发件人: Ivan Kudryavtsev <ku...@bw-sw.com>
> 发送时间: Monday, November 5, 2018 10:32:23 AM
> 收件人: users
> 主题: Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?
>
> Hi Li,
> Doesn't look like it's supported. Actually, CloudStack supports isolated
> networks in advanced zones which support the feature above by creation of
> isolated VLAN for every network with the dedicated virtual router and other
> stuff.
>
> вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 21:25, li li <di...@hotmail.com>:
>
> > HI ALL
> >
> > I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is
> > CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM
> or
> > XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
> >
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks LLC
> Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
> Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
>


-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks LLC
Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>

答复: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

Posted by li li <di...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Ivan



my target is:

1. All the user VM cannot reach other user VM.

2. All the user VM can reach SMB server and Gateway.



Any good suggestions?





________________________________
发件人: Ivan Kudryavtsev <ku...@bw-sw.com>
发送时间: Monday, November 5, 2018 10:32:23 AM
收件人: users
主题: Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

Hi Li,
Doesn't look like it's supported. Actually, CloudStack supports isolated
networks in advanced zones which support the feature above by creation of
isolated VLAN for every network with the dedicated virtual router and other
stuff.

вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 21:25, li li <di...@hotmail.com>:

> HI ALL
>
> I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is
> CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM or
> XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?
>
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
>


--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks LLC
Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>

Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

Posted by Ivan Kudryavtsev <ku...@bw-sw.com>.
Hi Li,
Doesn't look like it's supported. Actually, CloudStack supports isolated
networks in advanced zones which support the feature above by creation of
isolated VLAN for every network with the dedicated virtual router and other
stuff.

вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 21:25, li li <di...@hotmail.com>:

> HI ALL
>
> I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is
> CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM or
> XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?
>
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
>


-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks LLC
Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>