You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/02/18 23:31:02 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27049] - Build problem on older Redhat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27049>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27049

Build problem on older Redhat

David_N_Bertoni@lotus.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



------- Additional Comments From David_N_Bertoni@lotus.com  2004-02-18 22:31 -------
This is quite strange.  You can see we have a conditional block that does not 
try to use vector::assign(), which was put in place for very old 
compiler/library combinations.  Perhaps the code is now broken.  Can you 
attempt a build where you force the first part of conditional to be taken, by 
replacing:

#if defined(__SGI_STL_PORT) && __SGI_STL_PORT <= 0x400

with:

#if 1

If that works, we'll have to figure out what has changed.  We should probably 
move this up into our configure script so we can deal with this transparently.