You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@ambari.apache.org by Di Li <di...@ca.ibm.com> on 2016/12/07 17:08:31 UTC

Re: Review Request 54121: AMBARI-18929 : Yarn service check fails when either resource manager is down in HA enabled cluster

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54121/#review158350
-----------------------------------------------------------



hi Wei Wei,

Can you close this one ? The corresponding JIRA is resolved now.

- Di Li


On Nov. 29, 2016, 3:56 a.m., Weiwei Yang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54121/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 29, 2016, 3:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari and Di Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-18929
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18929
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Improve the logic of yarn service check, let it work as long as active RM is working fine
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/YARN/2.1.0.2.0/package/scripts/service_check.py c0bd480 
>   ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.0.6/YARN/test_yarn_service_check.py bb671aa 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54121/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> HA environment
>  1. Both active & standby RMs are up : SUCCESS
>  2. Shutdown standby RM, active remains up : SUCCESS
>  3. Shutdown active RM, active transited to the other RM : SUCCESS
>  4. Shutdown zookeeper, both RMs are standby : FAIL
>  5. Both RMs are down : FAIL
> 
> Non-HA environment
>  1. RM is up : SUCCESS
>  2. RM is down : FAIL
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Weiwei Yang
> 
>


Re: Review Request 54121: AMBARI-18929 : Yarn service check fails when either resource manager is down in HA enabled cluster

Posted by Weiwei Yang <ch...@hotmail.com>.

> On \u5341\u4e8c\u6708 7, 2016, 5:08 p.m., Di Li wrote:
> > hi Wei Wei,
> > 
> > Can you close this one ? The corresponding JIRA is resolved now.

Done, thanks.


- Weiwei


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54121/#review158350
-----------------------------------------------------------


On \u5341\u4e00\u6708 29, 2016, 3:56 a.m., Weiwei Yang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54121/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated \u5341\u4e00\u6708 29, 2016, 3:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari and Di Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-18929
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18929
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Improve the logic of yarn service check, let it work as long as active RM is working fine
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/YARN/2.1.0.2.0/package/scripts/service_check.py c0bd480 
>   ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.0.6/YARN/test_yarn_service_check.py bb671aa 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54121/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> HA environment
>  1. Both active & standby RMs are up : SUCCESS
>  2. Shutdown standby RM, active remains up : SUCCESS
>  3. Shutdown active RM, active transited to the other RM : SUCCESS
>  4. Shutdown zookeeper, both RMs are standby : FAIL
>  5. Both RMs are down : FAIL
> 
> Non-HA environment
>  1. RM is up : SUCCESS
>  2. RM is down : FAIL
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Weiwei Yang
> 
>