You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@thrift.apache.org by "Jens Geyer (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/09/10 20:08:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (THRIFT-5627) More consistent syntax for cpp_type
Jens Geyer created THRIFT-5627:
----------------------------------
Summary: More consistent syntax for cpp_type
Key: THRIFT-5627
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-5627
Project: Thrift
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Compiler (General)
Reporter: Jens Geyer
Assignee: Jens Geyer
As a side effect on my current work I recognized a warning that was there before:
Essentially it boils down to the list in these definitions taken from https://thrift.apache.org/docs/idl
{code}
[28] MapType ::= 'map' {color:#DE350B}CppType?{color} '<' FieldType ',' FieldType '>'
[29] SetType ::= 'set' {color:#DE350B}CppType?{color} '<' FieldType '>'
[30] ListType ::= 'list' '<' FieldType '>' {color:#DE350B}CppType?{color}
{code}
I wonder why we need it this way at all. Wouldn't it be better if list<> set<> and map<> would expect the same syntax?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)