You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cocoon.apache.org by Patrick Heiden <pa...@gmx.de> on 2008/11/28 23:02:15 UTC
passing parameters from pipelines to flowscript - possible?
Hello together!
Is it generally possible to pass parts or hole documents back to a flowscript controller, after a called pipeline has finished generation?
Maybe something like this (just for illustration ;) :
Flowscript:
...
temp = sendPage("servlet:someblock:/something")
...
/* now use some part of / or the whole temp to start another generation process */
anothertemp = sendPage("servlet:otherblock:/somethingelse", { "temp" : temp})
...
Are such concepts possible?
Best regards,
Patrick
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
Re: passing parameters from pipelines to flowscript - possible?
Posted by Patrick Heiden <pa...@gmx.de>.
Hello,
much thanks! It was exactly what I want to achieve - I will try it out.
Cheers,
Patrick
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:12:43 +0100
> Von: "Job van Ommen" <jo...@gmail.com>
> An: users@cocoon.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: passing parameters from pipelines to flowscript - possible?
> Do I understand correctly that you want to use the output of a pipeline in
> your flowscript?
>
> It can be done by this:
>
> var outputstream = new java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream();
> cocoon.processPipelineTo("formcleanup", form.getXML(), outputstream);
>
> info on this : http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/flow/api.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Job
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Patrick Heiden
> <pa...@gmx.de>wrote:
>
> > Hello together!
> >
> > Is it generally possible to pass parts or hole documents back to a
> > flowscript controller, after a called pipeline has finished generation?
> >
> > Maybe something like this (just for illustration ;) :
> >
> > Flowscript:
> >
> > ...
> > temp = sendPage("servlet:someblock:/something")
> > ...
> >
> > /* now use some part of / or the whole temp to start another generation
> > process */
> >
> > anothertemp = sendPage("servlet:otherblock:/somethingelse", { "temp" :
> > temp})
> > ...
> >
> >
> > Are such concepts possible?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Patrick
> > --
> > Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit
> allen:
> > http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
> >
> >
--
Sensationsangebot nur bis 30.11: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL
für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
Re: passing parameters from pipelines to flowscript - possible?
Posted by Job van Ommen <jo...@gmail.com>.
Do I understand correctly that you want to use the output of a pipeline in
your flowscript?
It can be done by this:
var outputstream = new java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream();
cocoon.processPipelineTo("formcleanup", form.getXML(), outputstream);
info on this : http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/flow/api.html
Regards,
Job
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Patrick Heiden <pa...@gmx.de>wrote:
> Hello together!
>
> Is it generally possible to pass parts or hole documents back to a
> flowscript controller, after a called pipeline has finished generation?
>
> Maybe something like this (just for illustration ;) :
>
> Flowscript:
>
> ...
> temp = sendPage("servlet:someblock:/something")
> ...
>
> /* now use some part of / or the whole temp to start another generation
> process */
>
> anothertemp = sendPage("servlet:otherblock:/somethingelse", { "temp" :
> temp})
> ...
>
>
> Are such concepts possible?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Patrick
> --
> Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen:
> http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
>
>