You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com.INVALID> on 2016/06/23 14:40:51 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1749869 - /felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
Um, I think you should have let me fix this as I’m the author? In any case I had a similar commit lined up to deliver and indeed intended the file to be apache-2.0 licensed.
david jencks
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 4:45 AM, cziegeler@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: cziegeler
> Date: Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
> New Revision: 1749869
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749869&view=rev
> Log:
> add missing license header
>
> Modified:
> felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
>
> Modified: felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java?rev=1749869&r1=1749868&r2=1749869&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java (original)
> +++ felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
> @@ -1,10 +1,28 @@
> +/*
> + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
> + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
> + * distributed with this work for additional information
> + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
> + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
> + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
> + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
> + *
> + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> + *
> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
> + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
> + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
> + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
> + * specific language governing permissions and limitations
> + * under the License.
> + */
> package org.apache.felix.scr.integration.components.felix5248;
>
> import java.util.Map;
>
> public class Component
> {
> -
> +
> void activate(Map<String, Object> props)
> {
> if (props.containsKey( "FAIL" ))
>
>
Re: svn commit: r1749869 - /felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Likewise done, thanks!
david jencks
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Done
>
> David Jencks wrote
>> If you can do it easily, I think that would be ideal, I can then re-do it. May be silly, but provides a slightly easier to follow legal path.
>>
>> many thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziegeler@apache.org
Re: svn commit: r1749869 -
/felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Done
David Jencks wrote
> If you can do it easily, I think that would be ideal, I can then re-do it. May be silly, but provides a slightly easier to follow legal path.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: svn commit: r1749869 - /felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
If you can do it easily, I think that would be ideal, I can then re-do it. May be silly, but provides a slightly easier to follow legal path.
many thanks
david jencks
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Should I revert?
>
> David Jencks wrote
>> If I had added the license header then svn alone would have included the entire legal trail related to the file licensing. Now, anyone concerned with it has to also consult this mailing list to see that I emailed my agreement to the license change.
>>
>> david jencks
>>
>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> David Jencks wrote
>>>> Um, I think you should have let me fix this as I’m the author? In any case I had a similar commit lined up to deliver and indeed intended the file to be apache-2.0 licensed.
>>>
>>> Ehm, why should only you fix a problem? If, for whatever reason, these
>>> files cant be apache licensed, you could still revert/remove.
>>>
>>> The build was failing because of this and I wanted to fix this asap.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Carsten
>>>
>>>>
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 4:45 AM, cziegeler@apache.org wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: cziegeler
>>>>> Date: Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
>>>>> New Revision: 1749869
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749869&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> add missing license header
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>> felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java?rev=1749869&r1=1749868&r2=1749869&view=diff
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java (original)
>>>>> +++ felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
>>>>> @@ -1,10 +1,28 @@
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
>>>>> + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
>>>>> + * distributed with this work for additional information
>>>>> + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
>>>>> + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
>>>>> + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
>>>>> + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
>>>>> + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
>>>>> + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
>>>>> + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
>>>>> + * specific language governing permissions and limitations
>>>>> + * under the License.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> package org.apache.felix.scr.integration.components.felix5248;
>>>>>
>>>>> import java.util.Map;
>>>>>
>>>>> public class Component
>>>>> {
>>>>> -
>>>>> +
>>>>> void activate(Map<String, Object> props)
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (props.containsKey( "FAIL" ))
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carsten Ziegeler
>>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>>> cziegeler@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziegeler@apache.org
Re: svn commit: r1749869 -
/felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Should I revert?
David Jencks wrote
> If I had added the license header then svn alone would have included the entire legal trail related to the file licensing. Now, anyone concerned with it has to also consult this mailing list to see that I emailed my agreement to the license change.
>
> david jencks
>
>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> David Jencks wrote
>>> Um, I think you should have let me fix this as I\u2019m the author? In any case I had a similar commit lined up to deliver and indeed intended the file to be apache-2.0 licensed.
>>
>> Ehm, why should only you fix a problem? If, for whatever reason, these
>> files cant be apache licensed, you could still revert/remove.
>>
>> The build was failing because of this and I wanted to fix this asap.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Carsten
>>
>>>
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 4:45 AM, cziegeler@apache.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Author: cziegeler
>>>> Date: Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
>>>> New Revision: 1749869
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749869&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> add missing license header
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
>>>>
>>>> Modified: felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java?rev=1749869&r1=1749868&r2=1749869&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java (original)
>>>> +++ felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
>>>> @@ -1,10 +1,28 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
>>>> + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
>>>> + * distributed with this work for additional information
>>>> + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
>>>> + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
>>>> + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
>>>> + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
>>>> + *
>>>> + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
>>>> + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
>>>> + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
>>>> + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
>>>> + * specific language governing permissions and limitations
>>>> + * under the License.
>>>> + */
>>>> package org.apache.felix.scr.integration.components.felix5248;
>>>>
>>>> import java.util.Map;
>>>>
>>>> public class Component
>>>> {
>>>> -
>>>> +
>>>> void activate(Map<String, Object> props)
>>>> {
>>>> if (props.containsKey( "FAIL" ))
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> cziegeler@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: svn commit: r1749869 - /felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
If I had added the license header then svn alone would have included the entire legal trail related to the file licensing. Now, anyone concerned with it has to also consult this mailing list to see that I emailed my agreement to the license change.
david jencks
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> David Jencks wrote
>> Um, I think you should have let me fix this as I’m the author? In any case I had a similar commit lined up to deliver and indeed intended the file to be apache-2.0 licensed.
>
> Ehm, why should only you fix a problem? If, for whatever reason, these
> files cant be apache licensed, you could still revert/remove.
>
> The build was failing because of this and I wanted to fix this asap.
>
> Thanks
> Carsten
>
>>
>> david jencks
>>
>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 4:45 AM, cziegeler@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: cziegeler
>>> Date: Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
>>> New Revision: 1749869
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749869&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> add missing license header
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
>>>
>>> Modified: felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java?rev=1749869&r1=1749868&r2=1749869&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java (original)
>>> +++ felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
>>> @@ -1,10 +1,28 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
>>> + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
>>> + * distributed with this work for additional information
>>> + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
>>> + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
>>> + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
>>> + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
>>> + *
>>> + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>>> + *
>>> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
>>> + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
>>> + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
>>> + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
>>> + * specific language governing permissions and limitations
>>> + * under the License.
>>> + */
>>> package org.apache.felix.scr.integration.components.felix5248;
>>>
>>> import java.util.Map;
>>>
>>> public class Component
>>> {
>>> -
>>> +
>>> void activate(Map<String, Object> props)
>>> {
>>> if (props.containsKey( "FAIL" ))
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziegeler@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
Re: svn commit: r1749869 -
/felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
David Jencks wrote
> Um, I think you should have let me fix this as I\u2019m the author? In any case I had a similar commit lined up to deliver and indeed intended the file to be apache-2.0 licensed.
Ehm, why should only you fix a problem? If, for whatever reason, these
files cant be apache licensed, you could still revert/remove.
The build was failing because of this and I wanted to fix this asap.
Thanks
Carsten
>
> david jencks
>
>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 4:45 AM, cziegeler@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: cziegeler
>> Date: Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
>> New Revision: 1749869
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749869&view=rev
>> Log:
>> add missing license header
>>
>> Modified:
>> felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
>>
>> Modified: felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java?rev=1749869&r1=1749868&r2=1749869&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java (original)
>> +++ felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java Thu Jun 23 11:45:33 2016
>> @@ -1,10 +1,28 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
>> + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
>> + * distributed with this work for additional information
>> + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
>> + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
>> + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
>> + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
>> + *
>> + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>> + *
>> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
>> + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
>> + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
>> + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
>> + * specific language governing permissions and limitations
>> + * under the License.
>> + */
>> package org.apache.felix.scr.integration.components.felix5248;
>>
>> import java.util.Map;
>>
>> public class Component
>> {
>> -
>> +
>> void activate(Map<String, Object> props)
>> {
>> if (props.containsKey( "FAIL" ))
>>
>>
>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: svn commit: r1749869 - /felix/trunk/scr/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/felix5248/Component.java
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:40 PM, David Jencks
<da...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> ...I had a similar commit lined up to deliver and indeed intended the file to
> be apache-2.0 licensed....
Note that anything that you commit is covered by your iCLA, so unless
explicitly flagged as being someone else's code it's automatically
covered by the Apache License.
-Bertrand