You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Kuhu Shukla (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/03 16:58:18 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (YARN-4311) Removing nodes from include and exclude lists will not remove them from decommissioned nodes list

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Kuhu Shukla updated YARN-4311:
------------------------------
    Attachment: YARN-4311-v11.patch

Re-attaching the v11 patch with no changes to trigger another pre-commit since TestResourceTrackerService failure are not reproducible locally and from investigation seem related to the sleep based wait. Need to see if this failure is consistent. Also checked that it applies clean to trunk.

> Removing nodes from include and exclude lists will not remove them from decommissioned nodes list
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4311
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4311
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.1
>            Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
>            Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
>         Attachments: YARN-4311-v1.patch, YARN-4311-v10.patch, YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v11.patch, YARN-4311-v2.patch, YARN-4311-v3.patch, YARN-4311-v4.patch, YARN-4311-v5.patch, YARN-4311-v6.patch, YARN-4311-v7.patch, YARN-4311-v8.patch, YARN-4311-v9.patch
>
>
> In order to fully forget about a node, removing the node from include and exclude list is not sufficient. The RM lists it under Decomm-ed nodes. The tricky part that [~jlowe] pointed out was the case when include lists are not used, in that case we don't want the nodes to fall off if they are not active.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)