Re: svn commit: r1723644 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/licenses/index.mdtext

[sebb <se...@gmail.com>]

On 8 January 2016 at 00:37,  <cl...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: clr
> Date: Fri Jan  8 00:37:29 2016
> New Revision: 1723644
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1723644&view=rev
> Log:
> clarify submitting gpg signed documents
>
> Modified:
>     infrastructure/site/trunk/content/licenses/index.mdtext
>
> Modified: infrastructure/site/trunk/content/licenses/index.mdtext
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/licenses/index.mdtext?rev=1723644&r1=1723643&r2=1723644&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- infrastructure/site/trunk/content/licenses/index.mdtext (original)
> +++ infrastructure/site/trunk/content/licenses/index.mdtext Fri Jan  8 00:37:29 2016
> @@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ file by preparing a detached PGP signatu
>  >gpg --armor --detach-sign icla.pdf
>
>  The above will create a file icla.pdf.asc. Send both the file and signature
> -as attachments in an email to secretary@apache.org. Please send only one
> -document per email. Please do not submit your public key to Apache.
> +as attachments in the same email to secretary@apache.org. Please send only one
> +document (file plus signature) per email. Please do not submit your public key to Apache.

Still seems a bit ambiguous to me; the detached sig can be considered
as a document, making 2 docs.

Might be clearer to say:

Please send only one ICLA document (plus its signature) per email.

>  The files typically are named
>  icla.txt and icla.txt.asc (or icla.pdf and icla.pdf.asc) for individual agreements;
>
>