You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mnemonic.apache.org by "Wang, Yanping" <ya...@intel.com> on 2016/04/04 06:20:22 UTC
RE: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Hi, All
Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
=====================================
-------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
* Still getting started at the Incubator
Mnemonic
--------------------
Mnemonic
Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place structured data processing and computing.
Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
>>Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
1. Name search JIRA is filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
2.
3.
>>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware of?
None
>>How has the community developed since the last report?
No new development as the project was just moved in.
This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other than 10 listed in Mnemonic proposal.
>>How has the project developed since the last report?
We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project, working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache Arrow community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and other directions for the project.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
>>Date of last release:
No release yet
>>When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
No election, since the project is just starting.
As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added. After that no new committers added yet.
====================================
Thanks
Yanping
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
here by April 6th:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
insight.
Patrick
Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by "Gangumalla, Uma" <um...@intel.com>.
On 4/3/16, 11:07 PM, "saint.ack@gmail.com on behalf of Stack"
<saint.ack@gmail.com on behalf of stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi, All
>>
>> Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
>>
>> =====================================
>> -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
>> * Still getting started at the Incubator
>> Mnemonic
>>
>>
>Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
>Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
>
>
>> --------------------
>> Mnemonic
>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
>> structured data processing and computing.
>>
>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
>> Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
>>
>>
>s/in/into/
>
>FYI, delays are normal.
>
>
>
>> >>Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>> 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
>> "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
>> 2.
>> 3.
>>
>>
>See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
>
>But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to
>work
>on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
I think we should add a point about community building. Plans/efforts
towards attracting more users and contributors. Eventually we nominate
them as committers after we received the welcomed contributions. I noticed
this point has become one of the major obstacle point for graduating some
other project from Incubation. This is very important point for project
health and future.
>
>
>
>> >>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>> aware of?
>> None
>>
>> >>How has the community developed since the last report?
>> No new development as the project was just moved in.
>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
>> stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other
>>than 10
>> listed in Mnemonic proposal.
>>
>> Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
>folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
>example reports on what folks do in here)
>
>
>
>> >>How has the project developed since the last report?
>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
>> are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
>>
>
>s/refactoring/refactorings/
>
>
>> We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
>
>
>Is the above complete?
>
>
>
>> working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
>> mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
>>Arrow
>> community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending
>> Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>>
>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
>> discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
>> other directions for the project.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
>>
>> >>Date of last release:
>> No release yet
>>
>> >>When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>> No election, since the project is just starting.
>> As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added. After
>> that no new committers added yet.
>>
>> ====================================
>>
>> Thanks
>> Yanping
>>
>>
>Otherwise, looks great.
>
>St.Ack
>
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>>
>> Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
>> 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
>> quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
>> here by April 6th:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
>>
>> Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
>> out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
>> If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
>> insight.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Yep, just closed the issue
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Henry,
>
> Thank you for your confirmation and advices, I just have tried to
> resolve that ticket but It looks I have no permission to close it,
> probably It is a different project from Mnemonic therefore that ticket
> have to be resolved/closed by your side so could you please help to
> resolve/close that ticket ? Thanks.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
>
>
> On 4/6/2016 11:25 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> > Yes, I think we are in good shape. Please do close the ticket as
> resolved.
> >
> > We need to manually merged the PR to ASF git repo instead of using Github
> > merge.
> >
> > If the commit message contains "This closes <PR number>" the ASF bot will
> > automatically close the Github PR.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Henry, right now, we can get notification once a PR has been pushed
> >> to the mirrored repos in Github, is it good enough for us ? as we known,
> >> we are not able to use Github interface to accept PR so if you agree we
> >> can close this ticket if desired, Thanks.
> >>
> >> On 4/6/2016 11:09 AM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> >>> It looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577 is
> >> waiting for Gary to verify the issue can be resolved without any change
> of
> >> current Infra.
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apache@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 10:21 AM
> >>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>>
> >>> I could see INFRA-11577 is not resolved and status is 'waiting for
> user'.
> >>> Should we include infrastructure open issues in report?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rakesh
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Wang, Yanping <yanping.wang@intel.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sure :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.saputra@gmail.com]
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM
> >>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>>>
> >>>> This one looks good to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do
> not
> >>>> think it is necessary.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Henry
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <
> yanping.wang@intel.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks all for the feedback.
> >>>>> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as
> needed.
> >>>>> ============================================
> >>>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> >>>>> structured data processing and computing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> >>>>> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Various metrics for March are as follows:
> >>>>> +--------------------------------------------+
> >>>>> | Metric | counts |
> >>>>> +--------------------------------------------+
> >>>>> | Non Merge Commits | 82 |
> >>>>> | Contributors | 10 |
> >>>>> | Jira New Issues | 13 |
> >>>>> | Resolved Issues | 4 |
> >>>>> | Pull Requests merged | |
> >>>>> | Pull Requests proposed | 3 |
> >>>>> +--------------------------------------------+
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
> >>>>> 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list
> >> discussions,
> >>>>> adding new contributors
> >>>>> 3. Develop new features
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> >>>>> aware of?
> >>>>> Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How has the community developed since the last report?
> >>>>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> >>>>> stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
> >>>>> Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are
> >> actively
> >>>>> discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
> >>>>> Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
> >>>>> extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How has the project developed since the last report?
> >>>>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23.
> We
> >>>>> are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit
> >>>> Apache
> >>>>> project standard.
> >>>>> We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
> >>>>> pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
> >>>>> We are structuring native computing feature interface.
> >>>>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were
> >>>>> solved.
> >>>>> Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to
> >>>> infrastructure,
> >>>>> code standard, features for the project.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Date of last release:
> >>>>> No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> >>>>> No election, since the project is just starting.
> >>>>> As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors
> were
> >>>>> proposed and added.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> >>>> Stack
> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
> >>>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <
> yanping.wang@intel.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi, All
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> =====================================
> >>>>>> -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
> >>>>>> * Still getting started at the Incubator
> >>>>>> Mnemonic
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
> >>>>> Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> --------------------
> >>>>>> Mnemonic
> >>>>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> >>>>>> structured data processing and computing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> >>>>>> Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> s/in/into/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> FYI, delays are normal.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards
> >>>> graduation:
> >>>>>> 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We
> >> propose
> >>>>>> "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
> >>>>>> 2.
> >>>>>> 3.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need
> to
> >>>> work
> >>>>> on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to
> >> be
> >>>>>> aware of?
> >>>>>> None
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> How has the community developed since the last report?
> >>>>>> No new development as the project was just moved in.
> >>>>>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in
> early
> >>>>>> stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other
> >>>> than
> >>>>> 10
> >>>>>> listed in Mnemonic proposal.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over?
> >> Usually
> >>>>> folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
> >>>>> example reports on what folks do in here)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> How has the project developed since the last report?
> >>>>>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23.
> >> We
> >>>>>> are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> s/refactoring/refactorings/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
> >>>>> Is the above complete?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
> pooling
> >>>>>> mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
> >>>>> Arrow
> >>>>>> community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for
> >> extending
> >>>>>> Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
> >>>>>> discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs
> and
> >>>>>> other directions for the project.
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Date of last release:
> >>>>>> No release yet
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> >>>>>> No election, since the project is just starting.
> >>>>>> As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added.
> >>>> After
> >>>>>> that no new committers added yet.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ====================================
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>> Yanping
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Otherwise, looks great.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> St.Ack
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
> >>>>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>> Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
> >>>>>> 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
> >>>>>> quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be
> posted
> >>>>>> here by April 6th:
> >>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Most communities put together a draft report following the format
> laid
> >>>>>> out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
> >>>>>> If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
> >>>>>> insight.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by Gary <ga...@apache.org>.
Hi Henry,
Thank you for your confirmation and advices, I just have tried to
resolve that ticket but It looks I have no permission to close it,
probably It is a different project from Mnemonic therefore that ticket
have to be resolved/closed by your side so could you please help to
resolve/close that ticket ? Thanks.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
On 4/6/2016 11:25 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Yes, I think we are in good shape. Please do close the ticket as resolved.
>
> We need to manually merged the PR to ASF git repo instead of using Github
> merge.
>
> If the commit message contains "This closes <PR number>" the ASF bot will
> automatically close the Github PR.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Henry, right now, we can get notification once a PR has been pushed
>> to the mirrored repos in Github, is it good enough for us ? as we known,
>> we are not able to use Github interface to accept PR so if you agree we
>> can close this ticket if desired, Thanks.
>>
>> On 4/6/2016 11:09 AM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
>>> It looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577 is
>> waiting for Gary to verify the issue can be resolved without any change of
>> current Infra.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apache@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 10:21 AM
>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>>>
>>> I could see INFRA-11577 is not resolved and status is 'waiting for user'.
>>> Should we include infrastructure open issues in report?
>>>
>>>
>>> Rakesh
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sure :-)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.saputra@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM
>>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>>>>
>>>> This one looks good to me.
>>>>
>>>> Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not
>>>> think it is necessary.
>>>>
>>>> - Henry
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks all for the feedback.
>>>>> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
>>>>> ============================================
>>>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
>>>>> structured data processing and computing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
>>>>> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
>>>>>
>>>>> Various metrics for March are as follows:
>>>>> +--------------------------------------------+
>>>>> | Metric | counts |
>>>>> +--------------------------------------------+
>>>>> | Non Merge Commits | 82 |
>>>>> | Contributors | 10 |
>>>>> | Jira New Issues | 13 |
>>>>> | Resolved Issues | 4 |
>>>>> | Pull Requests merged | |
>>>>> | Pull Requests proposed | 3 |
>>>>> +--------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
>>>>> 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list
>> discussions,
>>>>> adding new contributors
>>>>> 3. Develop new features
>>>>>
>>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>>>>> aware of?
>>>>> Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How has the community developed since the last report?
>>>>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
>>>>> stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
>>>>> Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are
>> actively
>>>>> discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
>>>>> Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
>>>>> extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How has the project developed since the last report?
>>>>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
>>>>> are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit
>>>> Apache
>>>>> project standard.
>>>>> We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
>>>>> pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
>>>>> We are structuring native computing feature interface.
>>>>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were
>>>>> solved.
>>>>> Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to
>>>> infrastructure,
>>>>> code standard, features for the project.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Date of last release:
>>>>> No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
>>>>>
>>>>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>>>>> No election, since the project is just starting.
>>>>> As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were
>>>>> proposed and added.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>>>> Stack
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
>>>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, All
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> =====================================
>>>>>> -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
>>>>>> * Still getting started at the Incubator
>>>>>> Mnemonic
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
>>>>> Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> --------------------
>>>>>> Mnemonic
>>>>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
>>>>>> structured data processing and computing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
>>>>>> Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> s/in/into/
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI, delays are normal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards
>>>> graduation:
>>>>>> 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We
>> propose
>>>>>> "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
>>>>>> 2.
>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to
>>>> work
>>>>> on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to
>> be
>>>>>> aware of?
>>>>>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How has the community developed since the last report?
>>>>>> No new development as the project was just moved in.
>>>>>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
>>>>>> stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other
>>>> than
>>>>> 10
>>>>>> listed in Mnemonic proposal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over?
>> Usually
>>>>> folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
>>>>> example reports on what folks do in here)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How has the project developed since the last report?
>>>>>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23.
>> We
>>>>>> are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
>>>>>>
>>>>> s/refactoring/refactorings/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
>>>>> Is the above complete?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
>>>>>> mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
>>>>> Arrow
>>>>>> community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for
>> extending
>>>>>> Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
>>>>>> discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
>>>>>> other directions for the project.
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Date of last release:
>>>>>> No release yet
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>>>>>> No election, since the project is just starting.
>>>>>> As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added.
>>>> After
>>>>>> that no new committers added yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ====================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Yanping
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise, looks great.
>>>>>
>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
>>>>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
>>>>>> 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
>>>>>> quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
>>>>>> here by April 6th:
>>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
>>>>>> out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
>>>>>> If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
>>>>>> insight.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I think we are in good shape. Please do close the ticket as resolved.
We need to manually merged the PR to ASF git repo instead of using Github
merge.
If the commit message contains "This closes <PR number>" the ASF bot will
automatically close the Github PR.
- Henry
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Henry, right now, we can get notification once a PR has been pushed
> to the mirrored repos in Github, is it good enough for us ? as we known,
> we are not able to use Github interface to accept PR so if you agree we
> can close this ticket if desired, Thanks.
>
> On 4/6/2016 11:09 AM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> > It looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577 is
> waiting for Gary to verify the issue can be resolved without any change of
> current Infra.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apache@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 10:21 AM
> > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >
> > I could see INFRA-11577 is not resolved and status is 'waiting for user'.
> > Should we include infrastructure open issues in report?
> >
> >
> > Rakesh
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sure :-)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.saputra@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM
> >> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>
> >> This one looks good to me.
> >>
> >> Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not
> >> think it is necessary.
> >>
> >> - Henry
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks all for the feedback.
> >>> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
> >>> ============================================
> >>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> >>> structured data processing and computing.
> >>>
> >>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> >>> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
> >>>
> >>> Various metrics for March are as follows:
> >>> +--------------------------------------------+
> >>> | Metric | counts |
> >>> +--------------------------------------------+
> >>> | Non Merge Commits | 82 |
> >>> | Contributors | 10 |
> >>> | Jira New Issues | 13 |
> >>> | Resolved Issues | 4 |
> >>> | Pull Requests merged | |
> >>> | Pull Requests proposed | 3 |
> >>> +--------------------------------------------+
> >>>
> >>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
> >>> 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list
> discussions,
> >>> adding new contributors
> >>> 3. Develop new features
> >>>
> >>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> >>> aware of?
> >>> Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How has the community developed since the last report?
> >>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> >>> stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
> >>> Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are
> actively
> >>> discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
> >>> Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
> >>> extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How has the project developed since the last report?
> >>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> >>> are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit
> >> Apache
> >>> project standard.
> >>> We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
> >>> pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
> >>> We are structuring native computing feature interface.
> >>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were
> >>> solved.
> >>> Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to
> >> infrastructure,
> >>> code standard, features for the project.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Date of last release:
> >>> No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
> >>>
> >>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> >>> No election, since the project is just starting.
> >>> As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were
> >>> proposed and added.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Stack
> >>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
> >>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi, All
> >>>>
> >>>> Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
> >>>>
> >>>> =====================================
> >>>> -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
> >>>> * Still getting started at the Incubator
> >>>> Mnemonic
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
> >>> Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> --------------------
> >>>> Mnemonic
> >>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> >>>> structured data processing and computing.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> >>>> Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> s/in/into/
> >>>
> >>> FYI, delays are normal.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards
> >> graduation:
> >>>> 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We
> propose
> >>>> "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
> >>>> 2.
> >>>> 3.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
> >>>
> >>> But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to
> >> work
> >>> on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to
> be
> >>>> aware of?
> >>>> None
> >>>>
> >>>>>> How has the community developed since the last report?
> >>>> No new development as the project was just moved in.
> >>>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> >>>> stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other
> >> than
> >>> 10
> >>>> listed in Mnemonic proposal.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over?
> Usually
> >>> folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
> >>> example reports on what folks do in here)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> How has the project developed since the last report?
> >>>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23.
> We
> >>>> are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
> >>>>
> >>> s/refactoring/refactorings/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
> >>>
> >>> Is the above complete?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
> >>>> mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
> >>> Arrow
> >>>> community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for
> extending
> >>>> Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
> >>>> discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
> >>>> other directions for the project.
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Date of last release:
> >>>> No release yet
> >>>>
> >>>>>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> >>>> No election, since the project is just starting.
> >>>> As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added.
> >> After
> >>>> that no new committers added yet.
> >>>>
> >>>> ====================================
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Yanping
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Otherwise, looks great.
> >>>
> >>> St.Ack
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
> >>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
> >>>> 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
> >>>> quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
> >>>> here by April 6th:
> >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
> >>>>
> >>>> Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
> >>>> out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
> >>>> If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
> >>>> insight.
> >>>>
> >>>> Patrick
> >>>>
>
>
>
Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by Gary <ga...@apache.org>.
Hi Henry, right now, we can get notification once a PR has been pushed
to the mirrored repos in Github, is it good enough for us ? as we known,
we are not able to use Github interface to accept PR so if you agree we
can close this ticket if desired, Thanks.
On 4/6/2016 11:09 AM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> It looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577 is waiting for Gary to verify the issue can be resolved without any change of current Infra.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apache@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 10:21 AM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>
> I could see INFRA-11577 is not resolved and status is 'waiting for user'.
> Should we include infrastructure open issues in report?
>
>
> Rakesh
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sure :-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.saputra@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM
>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>>
>> This one looks good to me.
>>
>> Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not
>> think it is necessary.
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks all for the feedback.
>>> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
>>> ============================================
>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
>>> structured data processing and computing.
>>>
>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
>>> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
>>>
>>> Various metrics for March are as follows:
>>> +--------------------------------------------+
>>> | Metric | counts |
>>> +--------------------------------------------+
>>> | Non Merge Commits | 82 |
>>> | Contributors | 10 |
>>> | Jira New Issues | 13 |
>>> | Resolved Issues | 4 |
>>> | Pull Requests merged | |
>>> | Pull Requests proposed | 3 |
>>> +--------------------------------------------+
>>>
>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>>
>>> 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
>>> 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions,
>>> adding new contributors
>>> 3. Develop new features
>>>
>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>>> aware of?
>>> Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
>>>
>>>
>>> How has the community developed since the last report?
>>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
>>> stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
>>> Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are actively
>>> discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
>>> Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
>>> extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>>>
>>>
>>> How has the project developed since the last report?
>>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
>>> are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit
>> Apache
>>> project standard.
>>> We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
>>> pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
>>> We are structuring native computing feature interface.
>>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were
>>> solved.
>>> Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to
>> infrastructure,
>>> code standard, features for the project.
>>>
>>>
>>> Date of last release:
>>> No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
>>>
>>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>>> No election, since the project is just starting.
>>> As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were
>>> proposed and added.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>> Stack
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, All
>>>>
>>>> Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
>>>>
>>>> =====================================
>>>> -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
>>>> * Still getting started at the Incubator
>>>> Mnemonic
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
>>> Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
>>>
>>>
>>>> --------------------
>>>> Mnemonic
>>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
>>>> structured data processing and computing.
>>>>
>>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
>>>> Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> s/in/into/
>>>
>>> FYI, delays are normal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards
>> graduation:
>>>> 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
>>>> "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
>>>> 2.
>>>> 3.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
>>>
>>> But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to
>> work
>>> on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>>>> aware of?
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>>>> How has the community developed since the last report?
>>>> No new development as the project was just moved in.
>>>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
>>>> stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other
>> than
>>> 10
>>>> listed in Mnemonic proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
>>> folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
>>> example reports on what folks do in here)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> How has the project developed since the last report?
>>>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
>>>> are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
>>>>
>>> s/refactoring/refactorings/
>>>
>>>
>>>> We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
>>>
>>> Is the above complete?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
>>>> mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
>>> Arrow
>>>> community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending
>>>> Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>>>>
>>>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
>>>> discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
>>>> other directions for the project.
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
>>>>
>>>>>> Date of last release:
>>>> No release yet
>>>>
>>>>>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>>>> No election, since the project is just starting.
>>>> As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added.
>> After
>>>> that no new committers added yet.
>>>>
>>>> ====================================
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Yanping
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Otherwise, looks great.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
>>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
>>>> 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
>>>> quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
>>>> here by April 6th:
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
>>>>
>>>> Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
>>>> out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
>>>> If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
>>>> insight.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
RE: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by "Wang, Yanping" <ya...@intel.com>.
It looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577 is waiting for Gary to verify the issue can be resolved without any change of current Infra.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apache@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 10:21 AM
To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
I could see INFRA-11577 is not resolved and status is 'waiting for user'.
Should we include infrastructure open issues in report?
Rakesh
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Sure :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.saputra@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>
> This one looks good to me.
>
> Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not
> think it is necessary.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks all for the feedback.
> > Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
> > ============================================
> > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> > structured data processing and computing.
> >
> > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> > Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
> >
> > Various metrics for March are as follows:
> > +--------------------------------------------+
> > | Metric | counts |
> > +--------------------------------------------+
> > | Non Merge Commits | 82 |
> > | Contributors | 10 |
> > | Jira New Issues | 13 |
> > | Resolved Issues | 4 |
> > | Pull Requests merged | |
> > | Pull Requests proposed | 3 |
> > +--------------------------------------------+
> >
> > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> >
> > 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
> > 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions,
> > adding new contributors
> > 3. Develop new features
> >
> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > aware of?
> > Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
> >
> >
> > How has the community developed since the last report?
> > This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> > stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
> > Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are actively
> > discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
> > Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
> > extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> >
> >
> > How has the project developed since the last report?
> > We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> > are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit
> Apache
> > project standard.
> > We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
> > pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
> > We are structuring native computing feature interface.
> > Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were
> > solved.
> > Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to
> infrastructure,
> > code standard, features for the project.
> >
> >
> > Date of last release:
> > No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
> >
> > When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> > No election, since the project is just starting.
> > As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were
> > proposed and added.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Stack
> > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
> > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, All
> > >
> > > Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
> > > * Still getting started at the Incubator
> > > Mnemonic
> > >
> > >
> > Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
> > Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
> >
> >
> > > --------------------
> > > Mnemonic
> > > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> > > structured data processing and computing.
> > >
> > > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> > > Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
> > >
> > >
> > s/in/into/
> >
> > FYI, delays are normal.
> >
> >
> >
> > > >>Three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation:
> > > 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
> > > "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
> > > 2.
> > > 3.
> > >
> > >
> > See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
> >
> > But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to
> work
> > on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
> >
> >
> >
> > > >>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > > aware of?
> > > None
> > >
> > > >>How has the community developed since the last report?
> > > No new development as the project was just moved in.
> > > This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> > > stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other
> than
> > 10
> > > listed in Mnemonic proposal.
> > >
> > > Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
> > folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
> > example reports on what folks do in here)
> >
> >
> >
> > > >>How has the project developed since the last report?
> > > We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> > > are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
> > >
> >
> > s/refactoring/refactorings/
> >
> >
> > > We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
> >
> >
> > Is the above complete?
> >
> >
> >
> > > working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
> > > mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
> > Arrow
> > > community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending
> > > Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> > >
> > > Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
> > > discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
> > > other directions for the project.
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
> > >
> > > >>Date of last release:
> > > No release yet
> > >
> > > >>When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> > > No election, since the project is just starting.
> > > As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added.
> After
> > > that no new committers added yet.
> > >
> > > ====================================
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Yanping
> > >
> > >
> > Otherwise, looks great.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
> > > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> > >
> > > Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
> > > 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
> > > quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
> > > here by April 6th:
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
> > >
> > > Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
> > > out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
> > > If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
> > > insight.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> >
>
Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by Rakesh Radhakrishnan <ra...@gmail.com>.
I could see INFRA-11577 is not resolved and status is 'waiting for user'.
Should we include infrastructure open issues in report?
Rakesh
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Sure :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.saputra@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>
> This one looks good to me.
>
> Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not
> think it is necessary.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks all for the feedback.
> > Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
> > ============================================
> > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> > structured data processing and computing.
> >
> > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> > Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
> >
> > Various metrics for March are as follows:
> > +--------------------------------------------+
> > | Metric | counts |
> > +--------------------------------------------+
> > | Non Merge Commits | 82 |
> > | Contributors | 10 |
> > | Jira New Issues | 13 |
> > | Resolved Issues | 4 |
> > | Pull Requests merged | |
> > | Pull Requests proposed | 3 |
> > +--------------------------------------------+
> >
> > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> >
> > 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
> > 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions,
> > adding new contributors
> > 3. Develop new features
> >
> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > aware of?
> > Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
> >
> >
> > How has the community developed since the last report?
> > This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> > stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
> > Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are actively
> > discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
> > Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
> > extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> >
> >
> > How has the project developed since the last report?
> > We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> > are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit
> Apache
> > project standard.
> > We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
> > pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
> > We are structuring native computing feature interface.
> > Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were
> > solved.
> > Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to
> infrastructure,
> > code standard, features for the project.
> >
> >
> > Date of last release:
> > No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
> >
> > When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> > No election, since the project is just starting.
> > As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were
> > proposed and added.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Stack
> > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
> > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, All
> > >
> > > Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
> > > * Still getting started at the Incubator
> > > Mnemonic
> > >
> > >
> > Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
> > Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
> >
> >
> > > --------------------
> > > Mnemonic
> > > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> > > structured data processing and computing.
> > >
> > > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> > > Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
> > >
> > >
> > s/in/into/
> >
> > FYI, delays are normal.
> >
> >
> >
> > > >>Three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation:
> > > 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
> > > "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
> > > 2.
> > > 3.
> > >
> > >
> > See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
> >
> > But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to
> work
> > on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
> >
> >
> >
> > > >>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > > aware of?
> > > None
> > >
> > > >>How has the community developed since the last report?
> > > No new development as the project was just moved in.
> > > This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> > > stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other
> than
> > 10
> > > listed in Mnemonic proposal.
> > >
> > > Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
> > folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
> > example reports on what folks do in here)
> >
> >
> >
> > > >>How has the project developed since the last report?
> > > We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> > > are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
> > >
> >
> > s/refactoring/refactorings/
> >
> >
> > > We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
> >
> >
> > Is the above complete?
> >
> >
> >
> > > working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
> > > mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
> > Arrow
> > > community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending
> > > Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> > >
> > > Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
> > > discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
> > > other directions for the project.
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
> > >
> > > >>Date of last release:
> > > No release yet
> > >
> > > >>When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> > > No election, since the project is just starting.
> > > As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added.
> After
> > > that no new committers added yet.
> > >
> > > ====================================
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Yanping
> > >
> > >
> > Otherwise, looks great.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
> > > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> > >
> > > Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
> > > 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
> > > quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
> > > here by April 6th:
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
> > >
> > > Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
> > > out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
> > > If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
> > > insight.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> >
>
RE: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by "Wang, Yanping" <ya...@intel.com>.
Sure :-)
Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.saputra@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM
To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
This one looks good to me.
Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not
think it is necessary.
- Henry
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Thanks all for the feedback.
> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
> ============================================
> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> structured data processing and computing.
>
> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
>
> Various metrics for March are as follows:
> +--------------------------------------------+
> | Metric | counts |
> +--------------------------------------------+
> | Non Merge Commits | 82 |
> | Contributors | 10 |
> | Jira New Issues | 13 |
> | Resolved Issues | 4 |
> | Pull Requests merged | |
> | Pull Requests proposed | 3 |
> +--------------------------------------------+
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
> 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
> 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions,
> adding new contributors
> 3. Develop new features
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
> Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
>
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
> Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are actively
> discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
> Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
> extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit Apache
> project standard.
> We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
> pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
> We are structuring native computing feature interface.
> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were
> solved.
> Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure,
> code standard, features for the project.
>
>
> Date of last release:
> No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
>
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> No election, since the project is just starting.
> As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were
> proposed and added.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, All
> >
> > Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
> >
> > =====================================
> > -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
> > * Still getting started at the Incubator
> > Mnemonic
> >
> >
> Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
> Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
>
>
> > --------------------
> > Mnemonic
> > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> > structured data processing and computing.
> >
> > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> > Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
> >
> >
> s/in/into/
>
> FYI, delays are normal.
>
>
>
> > >>Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> > 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
> > "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
> > 2.
> > 3.
> >
> >
> See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
>
> But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to work
> on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
>
>
>
> > >>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > aware of?
> > None
> >
> > >>How has the community developed since the last report?
> > No new development as the project was just moved in.
> > This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> > stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other than
> 10
> > listed in Mnemonic proposal.
> >
> > Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
> folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
> example reports on what folks do in here)
>
>
>
> > >>How has the project developed since the last report?
> > We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> > are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
> >
>
> s/refactoring/refactorings/
>
>
> > We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
>
>
> Is the above complete?
>
>
>
> > working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
> > mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
> Arrow
> > community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending
> > Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> >
> > Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
> > discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
> > other directions for the project.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
> >
> > >>Date of last release:
> > No release yet
> >
> > >>When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> > No election, since the project is just starting.
> > As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added. After
> > that no new committers added yet.
> >
> > ====================================
> >
> > Thanks
> > Yanping
> >
> >
> Otherwise, looks great.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
> > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >
> > Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
> > 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
> > quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
> > here by April 6th:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
> >
> > Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
> > out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
> > If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
> > insight.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
>
Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
This one looks good to me.
Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not
think it is necessary.
- Henry
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Thanks all for the feedback.
> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
> ============================================
> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> structured data processing and computing.
>
> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
>
> Various metrics for March are as follows:
> +--------------------------------------------+
> | Metric | counts |
> +--------------------------------------------+
> | Non Merge Commits | 82 |
> | Contributors | 10 |
> | Jira New Issues | 13 |
> | Resolved Issues | 4 |
> | Pull Requests merged | |
> | Pull Requests proposed | 3 |
> +--------------------------------------------+
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
> 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
> 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions,
> adding new contributors
> 3. Develop new features
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
> Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
>
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in
> Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are actively
> discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration.
> Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for
> extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit Apache
> project standard.
> We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying
> pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
> We are structuring native computing feature interface.
> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were
> solved.
> Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure,
> code standard, features for the project.
>
>
> Date of last release:
> No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
>
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> No election, since the project is just starting.
> As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were
> proposed and added.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, All
> >
> > Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
> >
> > =====================================
> > -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
> > * Still getting started at the Incubator
> > Mnemonic
> >
> >
> Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
> Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
>
>
> > --------------------
> > Mnemonic
> > Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> > structured data processing and computing.
> >
> > Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> > Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
> >
> >
> s/in/into/
>
> FYI, delays are normal.
>
>
>
> > >>Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> > 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
> > "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
> > 2.
> > 3.
> >
> >
> See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
>
> But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to work
> on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
>
>
>
> > >>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > aware of?
> > None
> >
> > >>How has the community developed since the last report?
> > No new development as the project was just moved in.
> > This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> > stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other than
> 10
> > listed in Mnemonic proposal.
> >
> > Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
> folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
> example reports on what folks do in here)
>
>
>
> > >>How has the project developed since the last report?
> > We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> > are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
> >
>
> s/refactoring/refactorings/
>
>
> > We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
>
>
> Is the above complete?
>
>
>
> > working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
> > mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
> Arrow
> > community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending
> > Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
> >
> > Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
> > discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
> > other directions for the project.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
> >
> > >>Date of last release:
> > No release yet
> >
> > >>When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> > No election, since the project is just starting.
> > As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added. After
> > that no new committers added yet.
> >
> > ====================================
> >
> > Thanks
> > Yanping
> >
> >
> Otherwise, looks great.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
> > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
> >
> > Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
> > 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
> > quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
> > here by April 6th:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
> >
> > Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
> > out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
> > If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
> > insight.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
>
RE: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by "Wang, Yanping" <ya...@intel.com>.
Thanks all for the feedback.
Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed.
============================================
Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place structured data processing and computing.
Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24
Various metrics for March are as follows:
+--------------------------------------------+
| Metric | counts |
+--------------------------------------------+
| Non Merge Commits | 82 |
| Contributors | 10 |
| Jira New Issues | 13 |
| Resolved Issues | 4 |
| Pull Requests merged | |
| Pull Requests proposed | 3 |
+--------------------------------------------+
Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release
2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions, adding new contributors
3. Develop new features
Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware of?
Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time.
How has the community developed since the last report?
This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are actively discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration. Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
How has the project developed since the last report?
We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit Apache project standard.
We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure.
We are structuring native computing feature interface.
Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were solved.
Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure, code standard, features for the project.
Date of last release:
No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release
When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
No election, since the project is just starting.
As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were proposed and added.
-----Original Message-----
From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM
To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
>
> =====================================
> -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
> * Still getting started at the Incubator
> Mnemonic
>
>
Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
> --------------------
> Mnemonic
> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> structured data processing and computing.
>
> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
>
>
s/in/into/
FYI, delays are normal.
> >>Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
> "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
> 2.
> 3.
>
>
See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to work
on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
> >>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
> None
>
> >>How has the community developed since the last report?
> No new development as the project was just moved in.
> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other than 10
> listed in Mnemonic proposal.
>
> Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
example reports on what folks do in here)
> >>How has the project developed since the last report?
> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
>
s/refactoring/refactorings/
> We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
Is the above complete?
> working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
> mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache Arrow
> community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending
> Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>
> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
> discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
> other directions for the project.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
>
> >>Date of last release:
> No release yet
>
> >>When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> No election, since the project is just starting.
> As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added. After
> that no new committers added yet.
>
> ====================================
>
> Thanks
> Yanping
>
>
Otherwise, looks great.
St.Ack
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>
> Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
> 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
> quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
> here by April 6th:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
>
> Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
> out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
> If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
> insight.
>
> Patrick
>
Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <ya...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
>
> =====================================
> -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
> * Still getting started at the Incubator
> Mnemonic
>
>
Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
> --------------------
> Mnemonic
> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
> structured data processing and computing.
>
> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
> Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
>
>
s/in/into/
FYI, delays are normal.
> >>Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
> "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
> 2.
> 3.
>
>
See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to work
on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
> >>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
> None
>
> >>How has the community developed since the last report?
> No new development as the project was just moved in.
> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
> stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other than 10
> listed in Mnemonic proposal.
>
> Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
example reports on what folks do in here)
> >>How has the project developed since the last report?
> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
> are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
>
s/refactoring/refactorings/
> We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
Is the above complete?
> working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
> mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache Arrow
> community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending
> Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>
> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
> discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
> other directions for the project.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
>
> >>Date of last release:
> No release yet
>
> >>When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> No election, since the project is just starting.
> As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added. After
> that no new committers added yet.
>
> ====================================
>
> Thanks
> Yanping
>
>
Otherwise, looks great.
St.Ack
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>
> Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
> 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
> quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
> here by April 6th:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
>
> Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
> out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
> If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
> insight.
>
> Patrick
>