You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org> on 2015/07/01 08:22:27 UTC
ApacheCon (ACEU) submissions due today
On 24/06/2015 Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
> hmm, just submitted a proposal yesterday evening
Deadline is tonight European time. I will submit a talk about the
OpenOffice/ODF "ecosystem". It will be enough to get one or two more
talks to build an OpenOffice track, so (as Jan already suggested
multiple times) if you plan to attend make sure you submit a talk
proposal and we can then coordinate and avoid overlapping.
Useful links at https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/FrontPage and remember
to submit for Apache Conference Europe 2015 (not US!) and for ApacheCon
Core (not the "Big Data" event).
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: ApacheCon (ACEU) submissions due today
Posted by jan i <ja...@apache.org>.
On Wednesday, July 1, 2015, Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> jan i wrote:
>
>> Deadline was last midnight, as said in several mails, but as usual the
>> apacheCON team accept late entries to a degree.
>>
>
> OK, thanks for being flexible.
>
> Nobody from OpenOffice stepped up to build a track, or to help review, so
>> there are no OpenOffice track planned. That said, I do hope (and are
>> pretty
>> sure) the
>> reviewers will point at some AOO talks so we will be represented.
>>
>
> Is there a difference between having N talks and calling it a (full or
> half) track? I know that for a track the selection process is the opposite
> (one proposes a track and volunteers to solicit talks), but if N (means: a
> sufficient number) of talks get in I don't see the difference.
the difference is the selection process, once we have schedule there are no
difference. The people who build tracks select the talks with little
influence from other reviewers, whereas the rest of the talks are in one
big group, giving a single talk more competition. In case of AOO it means
that without a track it is less likely that all talks will be accepted
(remark, I only
talk theory here, the selection process is just starting).
hope that explains the difference
rgds
jan i
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
Re: ApacheCon (ACEU) submissions due today
Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
jan i wrote:
> Deadline was last midnight, as said in several mails, but as usual the
> apacheCON team accept late entries to a degree.
OK, thanks for being flexible.
> Nobody from OpenOffice stepped up to build a track, or to help review, so
> there are no OpenOffice track planned. That said, I do hope (and are pretty
> sure) the
> reviewers will point at some AOO talks so we will be represented.
Is there a difference between having N talks and calling it a (full or
half) track? I know that for a track the selection process is the
opposite (one proposes a track and volunteers to solicit talks), but if
N (means: a sufficient number) of talks get in I don't see the difference.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: ApacheCon (ACEU) submissions due today
Posted by jan i <ja...@apache.org>.
On 1 July 2015 at 08:22, Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 24/06/2015 Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
>
>> hmm, just submitted a proposal yesterday evening
>>
>
> Deadline is tonight European time. I will submit a talk about the
> OpenOffice/ODF "ecosystem". It will be enough to get one or two more talks
> to build an OpenOffice track, so (as Jan already suggested multiple times)
> if you plan to attend make sure you submit a talk proposal and we can then
> coordinate and avoid overlapping.
>
Deadline was last midnight, as said in several mails, but as usual the
apacheCON team accept late entries to a degree.
Nobody from OpenOffice stepped up to build a track, or to help review, so
there are no OpenOffice track planned. That said, I do hope (and are pretty
sure) the
reviewers will point at some AOO talks so we will be represented.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Useful links at https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/FrontPage and remember
> to submit for Apache Conference Europe 2015 (not US!) and for ApacheCon
> Core (not the "Big Data" event).
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>