You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-user@ws.apache.org by Sandeep Heer <sa...@hitachi-eu.com> on 2001/12/12 11:12:42 UTC
Settings different for rpcrouter and messagerouter?
Hi
I am having problems getting my SOAP application to work. When i used
RPC i.e. calling a specific method on my webservice using Call and all
that stuff it worked fine.
I have now written a simple SOAP message system that does not seem to
work. I get the error message below. I take it since i am sending
messages (using envelopes etc.) i am to call messagerouter and not
rpcrouter. Do i need to change any settings etc apart from the URL i
point to in my client? Is my web service deployed the same way using
the admin screen as it was when i used RPC?
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema">
<SOAP-ENV:Body>
<SOAP-ENV:Fault>
<faultcode>SOAP-ENV:Server</faultcode>
<faultstring>Exception while handling service request:
org/apache/soap/Envelope</faultstring>
<faultactor>/soap/servlet/messagerouter</faultactor>
</SOAP-ENV:Fault>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mail Confidentiality Notice and Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited.
E-mail messages are not necessarily secure. Hitachi does not accept responsibility for any changes made to this message after it was sent.
Please note that Hitachi checks outgoing e-mail messages for the presence of computer viruses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Comparision of different toolkits
Posted by Jason Rutherglen <ja...@netgami.com>.
I would check out the AXIS toolkit. It is being made to be as easy to use
as GLUE.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Malley" <cm...@pixelzoom.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of different toolkits
> jyothi@india.softalia.com wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > there are so many soap toolkits available. i want to use a java
> > implementation of soap toolkit. out of these toolkits that are available
> > which one is better. How do i judge which toolkits are better, i mean
what
> > considerations should be taken care. Please help me someone out there
with
> > the details.
> >
> > thanks
> > jyoti
>
> If I had the luxury of working in an all-Java environment,
> I would probably try the free version of GLUE. For details,
> see http://www.themindelectric.com. I evaluated it briefly
> and I like what I see -- more so than Apache, Microsoft, WASP,
> pocketSOAP, etc, etc. Easier configuration, nice programming
> model, good documentation & examples. But alas, I'm required
> by my client to use Apache server-side (for good reasons) with
> a Windows client written in VC++ & Microsoft STK.
>
> -Chris
Re: Comparision of different toolkits
Posted by Jason Rutherglen <ja...@netgami.com>.
I would check out the AXIS toolkit. It is being made to be as easy to use
as GLUE.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Malley" <cm...@pixelzoom.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: Comparision of different toolkits
> jyothi@india.softalia.com wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > there are so many soap toolkits available. i want to use a java
> > implementation of soap toolkit. out of these toolkits that are available
> > which one is better. How do i judge which toolkits are better, i mean
what
> > considerations should be taken care. Please help me someone out there
with
> > the details.
> >
> > thanks
> > jyoti
>
> If I had the luxury of working in an all-Java environment,
> I would probably try the free version of GLUE. For details,
> see http://www.themindelectric.com. I evaluated it briefly
> and I like what I see -- more so than Apache, Microsoft, WASP,
> pocketSOAP, etc, etc. Easier configuration, nice programming
> model, good documentation & examples. But alas, I'm required
> by my client to use Apache server-side (for good reasons) with
> a Windows client written in VC++ & Microsoft STK.
>
> -Chris
Re: Comparision of different toolkits
Posted by Chris Malley <cm...@pixelzoom.com>.
jyothi@india.softalia.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> there are so many soap toolkits available. i want to use a java
> implementation of soap toolkit. out of these toolkits that are available
> which one is better. How do i judge which toolkits are better, i mean what
> considerations should be taken care. Please help me someone out there with
> the details.
>
> thanks
> jyoti
If I had the luxury of working in an all-Java environment,
I would probably try the free version of GLUE. For details,
see http://www.themindelectric.com. I evaluated it briefly
and I like what I see -- more so than Apache, Microsoft, WASP,
pocketSOAP, etc, etc. Easier configuration, nice programming
model, good documentation & examples. But alas, I'm required
by my client to use Apache server-side (for good reasons) with
a Windows client written in VC++ & Microsoft STK.
-Chris
Re: Comparision of different toolkits
Posted by Chris Malley <cm...@pixelzoom.com>.
jyothi@india.softalia.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> there are so many soap toolkits available. i want to use a java
> implementation of soap toolkit. out of these toolkits that are available
> which one is better. How do i judge which toolkits are better, i mean what
> considerations should be taken care. Please help me someone out there with
> the details.
>
> thanks
> jyoti
If I had the luxury of working in an all-Java environment,
I would probably try the free version of GLUE. For details,
see http://www.themindelectric.com. I evaluated it briefly
and I like what I see -- more so than Apache, Microsoft, WASP,
pocketSOAP, etc, etc. Easier configuration, nice programming
model, good documentation & examples. But alas, I'm required
by my client to use Apache server-side (for good reasons) with
a Windows client written in VC++ & Microsoft STK.
-Chris
Comparision of different toolkits
Posted by jy...@india.softalia.com.
Hi,
there are so many soap toolkits available. i want to use a java
implementation of soap toolkit. out of these toolkits that are available
which one is better. How do i judge which toolkits are better, i mean what
considerations should be taken care. Please help me someone out there with
the details.
thanks
jyoti
Comparision of different toolkits
Posted by jy...@india.softalia.com.
Hi,
there are so many soap toolkits available. i want to use a java
implementation of soap toolkit. out of these toolkits that are available
which one is better. How do i judge which toolkits are better, i mean what
considerations should be taken care. Please help me someone out there with
the details.
thanks
jyoti
Re: Settings different for rpcrouter and messagerouter?
Posted by Chris Malley <cm...@pixelzoom.com>.
Sandeep Heer wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am having problems getting my SOAP application to work. When i used
> RPC i.e. calling a specific method on my webservice using Call and all
> that stuff it worked fine.
>
> I have now written a simple SOAP message system that does not seem to
> work. I get the error message below. I take it since i am sending
> messages (using envelopes etc.) i am to call messagerouter and not
> rpcrouter. Do i need to change any settings etc apart from the URL i
> point to in my client? Is my web service deployed the same way using
> the admin screen as it was when i used RPC?
>
> <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
> xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema">
>
> <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>
> <SOAP-ENV:Fault>
>
> <faultcode>SOAP-ENV:Server</faultcode>
>
> <faultstring>Exception while handling service request:
> org/apache/soap/Envelope</faultstring>
>
> <faultactor>/soap/servlet/messagerouter</faultactor>
>
> </SOAP-ENV:Fault>
>
> </SOAP-ENV:Body>
>
> </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
>
This looks like the same brain-damaged problem I had with
message-style services when moving from Tomcat 3.2.3 to
Tomcat 4.01. If you're using Tomcat 4.01, and if you
follow the instructions for installing Apache SOAP 2.2,
then message-style servies will produce strange, seemingly-
unrelated faults, HTTP authentication won't work, etc.
The problem is apparently caused by having the SOAP
classes in two places:
$CATALINA_HOME/lib/soap.jar, and
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/soap/WEB-INF/classes.
I "fixed" this by removing
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/soap/WEB-INF/classes/org
For more detals, search for "Tomcat 4.01 classloader"
in the tomcat-user mailing list archives. There are
a couple of posts there from me, along with various
replies that suggest how to fix it and
-Chris
--
Chris Malley
PixelZoom, Inc. Voice: +1.303.494.8849
835 Orman Drive EMail: cmalley@pixelzoom.com
Boulder CO 80303-2616
Re: Settings different for rpcrouter and messagerouter?
Posted by Chris Malley <cm...@pixelzoom.com>.
Sandeep Heer wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am having problems getting my SOAP application to work. When i used
> RPC i.e. calling a specific method on my webservice using Call and all
> that stuff it worked fine.
>
> I have now written a simple SOAP message system that does not seem to
> work. I get the error message below. I take it since i am sending
> messages (using envelopes etc.) i am to call messagerouter and not
> rpcrouter. Do i need to change any settings etc apart from the URL i
> point to in my client? Is my web service deployed the same way using
> the admin screen as it was when i used RPC?
>
> <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
> xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema">
>
> <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>
> <SOAP-ENV:Fault>
>
> <faultcode>SOAP-ENV:Server</faultcode>
>
> <faultstring>Exception while handling service request:
> org/apache/soap/Envelope</faultstring>
>
> <faultactor>/soap/servlet/messagerouter</faultactor>
>
> </SOAP-ENV:Fault>
>
> </SOAP-ENV:Body>
>
> </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
>
This looks like the same brain-damaged problem I had with
message-style services when moving from Tomcat 3.2.3 to
Tomcat 4.01. If you're using Tomcat 4.01, and if you
follow the instructions for installing Apache SOAP 2.2,
then message-style servies will produce strange, seemingly-
unrelated faults, HTTP authentication won't work, etc.
The problem is apparently caused by having the SOAP
classes in two places:
$CATALINA_HOME/lib/soap.jar, and
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/soap/WEB-INF/classes.
I "fixed" this by removing
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/soap/WEB-INF/classes/org
For more detals, search for "Tomcat 4.01 classloader"
in the tomcat-user mailing list archives. There are
a couple of posts there from me, along with various
replies that suggest how to fix it and
-Chris
--
Chris Malley
PixelZoom, Inc. Voice: +1.303.494.8849
835 Orman Drive EMail: cmalley@pixelzoom.com
Boulder CO 80303-2616