You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2006/10/05 13:27:20 UTC
XBean annotation for ActiveMQConnectionFactory
What about adding an xbean annotation on
the ActiveMQConnectionFactory ? This is
a commonly used object and it would
benefit from an xbean based syntax imho.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: XBean annotation for ActiveMQConnectionFactory
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 10/5/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cool :)
> I missed them, I was looking at the 4.0.2 tag ..
Ah yeah, I was using trunk. We should add them for 4.0.x I guess -
though hopefully we can release 4.1 soon
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: XBean annotation for ActiveMQConnectionFactory
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Cool :)
I missed them, I was looking at the 4.0.2 tag ..
On 10/5/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/5/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What about adding an xbean annotation on
> > the ActiveMQConnectionFactory ? This is
> > a commonly used object and it would
> > benefit from an xbean based syntax imho.
>
> Good idea - though I'd added them to the connection factory
> implementations in the spring package - which adds some spring-aware
> helpers (like using the bean name in the generated JMS clientID - so
> if you use different IDs in your spring files, you'll get more helpful
> clientIDs when debugging).
>
> I was working with a customer a little while back who had lots of
> spring configuration files and they found it helpful to name the JMS
> clients so they could easily see what app was connecting etc.
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: XBean annotation for ActiveMQConnectionFactory
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 10/5/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about adding an xbean annotation on
> the ActiveMQConnectionFactory ? This is
> a commonly used object and it would
> benefit from an xbean based syntax imho.
Good idea - though I'd added them to the connection factory
implementations in the spring package - which adds some spring-aware
helpers (like using the bean name in the generated JMS clientID - so
if you use different IDs in your spring files, you'll get more helpful
clientIDs when debugging).
I was working with a customer a little while back who had lots of
spring configuration files and they found it helpful to name the JMS
clients so they could easily see what app was connecting etc.
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/